On “Stepping Back and Letting Go”: The Role of Control in the Success or Failure of Social Studies Simulations

REFERENCES

• Aldrich, C. (2006). 9 paradoxes of educational simulations: A new way to view a world that is not that tidy. Training + Development, 60(5), 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Armaline, W. T. (2009). Thoughts on anarchist pedagogy and epistemology. In R. Amster, A. DeLeon, L. A. Fernandez, A. J. Nocella, & D. Shannon (Eds.), Contemporary anarchist studies: An introductory anthology of anarchy in the academy. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, T. (1998). Make your history class hop with excitement (at least once a semester): Designing and using classroom simulations. History Teacher,31, 193–204.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2010). Why don’t more history teachers engage students in interpretation? In W. C. Parker (Ed.), Social studies today: Research & practice (pp. 35–42). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blaga, J. J. (1978). A study of teachers’ perceptions and utilization of simulations in public secondary social studies classrooms in Ohio (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bredemeier, M. E., & Greenblat, C. S. (1981). The educational effectiveness of simulation games: A synthesis of findings. Simulation & Gaming,12, 307–332. doi:10.1177/104687818101200304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, S. (2014). Connecting the past to the present in the middle-level classroom: A comparative case study. Theory & Research in Social Education,42, 65–95. doi:10.1080/00933104.2013.860068
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. T. (1988). Games and simulations: Creative educational alternatives. Techtrends,33(4), 20–23. doi:10.1007/BF02771190
   Google Scholar
• Buzzelli, C. A., & Johnston, B. (2002). The moral dimensions of teaching: Language, power and culture in classroom interactions. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S. (2007). Externalising students’ mental models through concept maps. Journal of Biological Education,41(3), 107–112. doi:10.1080/00219266.2007.9656078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, J., Dukes, R., & Gamson, W. (2009). Assessment in simulation and gaming: A review of the last 40 years. Simulation & Gaming,40, 553–568. doi:10.1177/1046878109332955
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (2003). The function of schools: Subtler and cruder methods of control. In K. J. Saltman & D. A. Gabbard (Eds.), Education as enforcement: The militarization and corporatization of schools (pp. 25–36). New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Colella, V. (2000). Participatory simulations: Building collaborative understanding through immersive dynamic modeling. Journal of the Learning Sciences,9, 471–500. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornbleth, C. (2010). What constrains meaningful social studies teaching? In W. C. Parker (Ed.), Social studies today: Research & practice (pp. 215–223). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, T. (2008). Winning the epistemological struggle: Constructing a cultural model of shared authority in an elementary classroom. Teachers College Record,110, 1706–1736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice,39, 124–130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crookall, D. (2010). Serious games, debriefing, and simulation/gaming as a discipline. Simulation & Gaming,41, 898–920. doi:10.1177/1046878110390784
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1986). Persistent instruction: Another look at constancy in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan,68(1), 7–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• DeLeon, A. P. (2008). Are we simulating the status quo? Ideology and social studies simulations. Theory & Research in Social Education,36, 256–277. doi:10.1080/00933104.2008.10473375
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2009). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1997 [1938]). Experience and education. New York, NY: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• DiCamillo, L., & Gradwell, J. (2013). To simulate or not to simulate? Investigating myths about social studies simulations. The Social Studies,104(4), 155–160. doi:10.1080/00377996.2012.716094
   Google Scholar
• DiCamillo, L., & Gradwell, J. M. (2012). Using simulations to teach middle grades US history in an age of accountability. RMLE Online,35(7), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology,18(1), 7–22. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Else, L. (2006). An unforgettable lesson. New Scientist,192(2581), 52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshel, Y., & Kohavi, R. (2003). Perceived classroom control, self-regulated learning strategies, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology,23, 249–260. doi:10.1080/0144341032000060093
   Google Scholar
• Fogo, B. (2014). Core practices for teaching history: Theresults of a Delphi panel survey. Theory & Research in Social Education,42, 151–196. doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.902781
   Google Scholar
• Ganzler, L. M. (2010). Simulated citizen: How students experienced a semester length legislative simulation (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. 3448866)
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2009). Video games, learning, and “content”. In C. T. Miller (Ed.), Games: Purpose and potential in education (pp. 43–53). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09776-6_3
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (Ed.). (1973). The interpretation of culture: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gehlbach, H. (2011). Making social studies social: Engaging students through different forms of social perspective taking. Theory into Practice,50, 311–318. doi:10.1080/00405841.2011.607394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehlbach, H., Brown, S. W., Ioannou, A., Boyer, M. A., Hudson, N., Niv-Solomon, A., … Janik, L. (2008). Increasing interest in social studies: Social perspective taking and self-efficacy in stimulating simulations. Contemporary Educational Psychology,33, 894–914. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, J. A. (1973). Designing simulation/games in social studies: The game doesn’t end with winning. Viewpoints,49(6), 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gilley, J. W. (2004). Adult learning methods: A guide for effective instruction. In M. W. Galbraith (Ed.), Adult learning methods: A guide for effective instruction (3rd ed., pp. 361–381). Malabar, FL: Krieger.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (2010). Teachers as transformative intellectuals. In A. S. Canestrari & B. A. Marlowe (Eds.), Educational foundations: An anthology of critical readings (2nd ed., pp. 197–204). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Adeline.
   Google Scholar
• Glavin, R. (2008). Developing your teaching role in a simulation center. In R. H. Riley (Ed.), Manual of simulation in healthcare (pp. 115–124). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, S. G. (2010). High-stakes testing: How are social studies teachers responding? In W. C. Parker (Ed.), Social studies today: Research & practice (pp. 43–52). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, S. G., & Gradwell, J. M. (Eds.). (2010). Teaching history with big ideas. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannou, A., Brown, S. W., Hannafin, R. D., & Boyer, M. A. (2009). Can multimedia make kids care about social studies? The GlobalEd problem-based learning simulation. Computers in the Schools,26(1), 63–81. doi:10.1080/07380560802688299
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. R., Boyer, M. A., & Brown, S. W. (2011). Vital interests: Cultivating global competence in the international studies classroom. Globalisation, Societies and Education,9, 503–519. doi:10.1080/14767724.2011.605331
   Google Scholar
• Kiany, G. R., & Shayestefar, P. (2011). High school students’ perceptions of EFL teacher control orientations and their English academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology,81, 491–508. doi:10.1348/000709910X522177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, T. E. (2012). Fragile identities: Exploring learner identity, learner autonomy and motivation through young learners’ voices. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée,14(2), 68–85.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh, E., & Spindler, L. (2004). Simulations and games as chaordic learning contexts. Simulation & Gaming,35(1), 53–69. doi:10.1177/1046878103252886
   Google Scholar
• LePage, P., Darling-Hammond, L., Akar, H., Gutierrez, C., Jenkins-Gunn, E., & Rosebrock, K. (2005). Classroom management. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 327–357). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Levstik, L. S. (2008). What happens in social studies classrooms: Research on k–12 social studies practice. In L. S. Levstik & C. A. Tyson ( Eds), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 50–62). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maitles, H., & McKelvie, E. (2010). “Why does wearing a yellow bib make us different?”: A case study of explaining discrimination in a west of Scotland secondary (high) school. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies,8, 245–261.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. (2003). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, L. M. (1982). Defensive teaching and classroom control (Report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education. ( Eric database, ED221958)
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, L. M. (1986). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A source book of new methods (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.socialstudies.org/standards/foreword
   Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies. (2008). A vision of powerful teaching and learning in the social studies: Building social understanding and civic efficacy: A position statement of national council for the social studies. Retrieved from http://www.socialstudies.org/positions/powerful
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. (2008). Thus spake zarathustra: A book for all and none (T. Common, Trans.). Fairbanks, AK: Project Gutenberg. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1998/1998-h/1998-h.htm
   Google Scholar
• Niv-Solomon, A., Janik, L. L., Boyer, M. A., Hudson, N., Urlacher, B., Brown, S. W., & Maneggia, D. (2011). Evolving beyond self-interest? Some experimental findings from simulated international negotiations. Simulation & Gaming,42, 711–732. doi:10.1177/1046878109341764
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Pensacola: Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Retrieved from http://cmap.ihmc.us/publications/researchpapers/theorycmaps/theoryunderlyingconceptmaps.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nye Jr., J. S. (1990). Soft power. Foreign Policy,80, 153–171.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, J. L. (2006). Saving (and losing) face, race, and authority: Strategies of action in a 9th grade English class. In J. L. Pace & A. Hemmings (Eds.), Classroom authority: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 87–112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, J. L. (2007). Why we need to save (and strengthen) social studies. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.socialstudies.org/positions/powerful
   Google Scholar
• Pace, J. L. (2010). Studying authority in a secondary teacher education class. In E. E. Heilman, R. F. Amthor, & M. T. Missias (Eds.), Social studies and diversity education (pp. 57–62). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, J. L., & Hemmings, A. (2007). Understanding authority in classrooms: A review of theory, ideology, and research. Review of Educational Research,77(1), 4–27. doi:10.3102/003465430298489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, W., Mosborg, S., Bransford, J., Vye, N., Wilkerson, J., & Abbott, R. (2011). Rethinking advanced high school coursework: Tackling the depth/breadth tension in the AP U.S. government and politics course. Journal of Curriculum Studies,43, 533–559. doi:10.1080/00220272.2011.584561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C., Lo, J., Yeo, A. J., Valencia, S. W., Nguyen, D., Abbott, R. D., … Vye, N. J. (2013). Beyond breadth-speed-test: Toward deeper knowing and engagement in an advanced placement course. American Educational Research Journal,50, 1424–1459. doi:10.3102/0002831213504237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International. (2012). NVivo 10 [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.qsrinternational.com
   Google Scholar
• Robert, H. M., Robert, S. C., Evans, W. J., Honemann, D. H., & Balch, T. J. (2011). Robert’s rules of order: Newly revised (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Da Capo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, E. W. (2010). Exploring Taylorism and its continued influence on work and schooling. In E. E. Heilman, R. F. Amthor, & M. T. Missias (Eds.), Social studies and diversity education (pp. 33–37). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruona, W. E. A. (2005). Analyzing qualitative data. In R. A. Swanson & E. F. Holton (Eds.), Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, W. B. (2010). Teaching social studies in the 21st century: A research study of secondary social studies teachers’ instructional methods and practices. Action in Teacher Education,32(1), 65–72. doi:10.1080/01626620.2010.10463543
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schweber, S. A. (2003). Simulating survival. Curriculum Inquiry,33, 139–188. doi:10.1111/curi.2003.33.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweber, S. A. (2004). Making sense of the Holocaust: Lessons from classroom practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, I. E. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. T., & Boyer, M. A. (1996). Designing in-class simulations. PS: Political Science and Politics,29, 690–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation,27, 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., & Stroup, W. (1999). Learning through participatory simulations: Network-based design for systems learning in classrooms. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the computer supported collaborative learning conference (pp. 667–676). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. H., & Williams, A. J. (2007). In pursuit of peace: Attitudinal and behavioral change with simulations and multiple identification theory. Simulation & Gaming,38, 453–471. doi:10.1177/1046878107300675
   Google Scholar
• Wright-Maley, C. (in press). Beyond the “Babel problem”: Defining simulations for the social studies. Journal of Social Studies Research. doi:10.1016/j.jssr.214.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Yeager, E. A., & Davis, O. L. (Eds.). (2005). Wise social studies teaching in an age of high-stakes testing. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. F., Slota, S. T., & Lai, B. (2012). Comments on “Reflections on ‘a review of trends in serious gaming.’” Review of Educational Research,82, 296–299. doi:10.3102/0034654312456606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukhymenko, M. (2011). Students’ interest in social studies and negotiation self-efficacy: A meta-analysis of the GlobalEd project. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19, 369–392.
   Google Scholar