918
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Features

“Happy Professional Development at an Unhappy Time”: Learning to Teach for Historical Thinking in a High-Pressure Accountability Context

REFERENCES

  • Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1994). Observational techniques. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research ( pp. 377–392). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Anagnostopoulos, D., & Rutledge, S. (2007). Making sense of school sanctioning policies in urban high schools: Charting the depth and drift of school and classroom change. Teachers College Record, 109, 1261–1302.
  • Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258–267. doi:10.3102/0013189x07306523
  • Bain, R. B. (2005). “They thought the world was flat?” Applying the principles of how people learn in teaching high school history. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History in the classroom (pp. 179–214). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Bain, R. B. (2006). Rounding up unusual suspects: Facing the authority hidden in the history classroom. Teachers College Record, 108, 2080–2114. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00775.x
  • Barton, K. C. (2015). Elicitation techniques: Getting people to talk about ideas they don’t usually talk about. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43, 179–205. doi:10.1080/00933104.2015.1034392
  • Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41, 287–302. doi:10.1080/0305764x.2011.607151
  • Boardman, A. G., & Woodruff, A. L. (2004). Teacher change and “high-stakes” assessment: What happens to professional development? Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 545–557. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.06.001
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). New York, NY: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189x033008003
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, K. (2005). Researching teacher education in changing times: Politics and paradigms. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report on the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 69–109). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102, 294–343. doi:10.1111/0161-4681.00057
  • Cornbleth, C. (2008). Echoes effects and curriculum change. Teachers College Record, 110, 2148–2171.
  • Creswell, J. (2006). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Crocco, M. S., & Costigan, A. T. (2007). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in an age of accountability: Urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42, 512–534. doi:10.1177/0042085907304964
  • Daly, A. J., & Finnigan, K. S. (2011). The ebb and flow of social network ties between district leaders under high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 39–79. doi:10.3102/0002831210368990
  • De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 139–156. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.139
  • De La Paz, S., Malkus, N., Monte-Sano, C., & Montanaro, E. (2011). Evaluating American history teachers’ professional development: Effects on student learning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39, 494–540. doi:10.1080/00933104.2011.10473465
  • Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., Garet, M., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112. doi:10.3102/01623737024002081
  • DeWitt, S., Patterson, N., Blankenship, W., Blevins, B., DiCamillo, L., Gerwin, D., … Sullivan, C. C. (2013). The lower order expectations of high-stakes tests: A four-state analysis of social studies standards and test alignment. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41, 382–427. doi:10.1080/00933104.2013.787031
  • Engeström, Y. (1991). Non scolae sed vitae discimus: Toward overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. Learning and Instruction, 1, 243–259. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(91)90006-t
  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2012). Teachers as learners. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  • Finnigan, K. S., & Gross, B. (2007). Do accountability policy sanctions influence teacher motivation? Lessons from Chicago’s low-performing schools. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 594–630. doi:10.3102/0002831207306767
  • Gerwin, D., & Visone, F. (2006). The freedom to teach: Contrasting history teaching in elective and state–tested courses. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34, 259–282. doi:10.1080/00933104.2006.10473307
  • Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education. (2012). Shifting paradigms: Beyond the abstract. Assessment, Teaching, and Learning, 2(2), 1–6.
  • Gradwell, J. (2006). Teaching in spite of, rather than because of, the test: A case of ambitious history teaching in New York State. In S. G. Grant (Ed.), Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States (pp. 157–176). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Grant, S. G. (1997). Opportunities lost: Teachers learning about the New York State social studies framework. Theory & Research in Social Education, 25, 259–287. doi:10.1080/00933104.1997.10505808
  • Grant, S. G. (2003). History lessons: Teaching, learning, and testing in U.S. high school classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Grant, S. G. (Ed.). (2006). Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Grant, S. G., Gradwell, J. M., Lauricella, A. M., Derme-Insinna, A., Pullano, L., & Tzetzo, K. (2002). When increasing stakes need not mean increasing standards: The case of the New York state global history and geography exams. Theory & Research in Social Education, 30, 488–515. doi:10.1080/00933104.2002.10473208
  • Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942–1012. doi:10.1111/0161-4681.00140
  • Haertel, E. F. (2013). Reliability and validity of inferences about teachers based on student test scores. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved May 17, 2015, from, https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/PICANG14.pdf
  • Hawley, W., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice ( pp. 127–150). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Hochberg, E. D., & Desimone, L. M. (2010). Professional development in the accountability context: Building capacity to achieve standards. Educational Psychologist, 45, 89–106. doi:10.1080/00461521003703052
  • Hursh, D. (2013). Raising the stakes: High-stakes testing and the attack on public education in New York. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 574–588. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.758829
  • Kazemi, E., & Hubbard, A. (2008). New directions for the design and study of professional development: Attending to the coevolution of teachers’ participation across contexts. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 428–441. doi:10.1177/0022487108324330
  • Koretz, D. (2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 476–500. doi:10.3102/0162373713519496
  • Leonardatos, H., & Zahedi, K. (2014). Accountability and “racing to the top” in New York State: A report from the frontlines. Teachers College Record, 116(9), 1–23.
  • Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (2008). Researching history education: Theory, method, and context. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (2010). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Maggioni, L., VanSledright, B., & Alexander, P. A. (2009). Walking on the borders: A measure of epistemic cognition in history. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77, 187–214.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Monte-Sano, C. (2008). Qualities of historical writing instruction: A comparative case study of two teachers’ practices. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1045–1079. doi:10.3102/0002831208319733
  • Pace, J. L. (2011). The complex and unequal impact of high stakes accountability on untested social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39, 32–60. doi:10.1080/00933104.2011.10473446
  • Pace, J. L. (2015). The charged classroom: Predicaments and possibilities for democratic teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 921–958. doi:10.3102/0002831207308221
  • Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Reddy, K. (2013). Challenging preservice teacher beliefs about the past: The influence of a course designed to shift ways of knowing about history teaching and learning ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.
  • Reich, G. (2009). Testing historical knowledge: Standards, multiple-choice questions, and student reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 37, 325–360. doi:10.1080/00933104.2009.10473401
  • Reich, G. (2015). Measuring up? Multiple-choice questions. In K. Ercikan & P. Sexias (Eds.), New directions in assessing historical thinking ( pp. 221–232). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Reisman, A. (2012). Reading like a historian: A document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 86–112. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.634081
  • Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186–232. doi:10.3102/0034654306298273
  • Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sandwell, R., & Von Heyking, A. (Eds.). (2014). Becoming a history teacher: Sustaining practices in historical thinking and knowing. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • Saye, J. W., & the Social Studies Inquiry Research Collaborative (SSIRC). (2013). Authentic pedagogy: Its presence in social studies classrooms and relationship to student performance on state-mandated tests. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41, 89–132. doi:10.1080/00933104.2013.756785
  • Sloan, K. (2006). Teacher identity and agency in school worlds: Beyond the all-good/all-bad discourse on accountability-explicit curriculum policies. Curriculum Inquiry, 36, 119–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873x.2006.00350.x
  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Stillman, J. (2011). Teacher learning in an era of high-stakes accountability: Productive tension and critical professional practice. Teachers College Record, 113, 133–180.
  • Stodolsky, S. S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 519–558. doi:10.3102/0002831207306859
  • Valli, L., Croninger, R., & Buese, D. (2012). Studying high-quality teaching in a highly charged policy environment. Teachers College Record, 114, 33.
  • van Drie, J., Havekes, H., & van Boxtel, C. (2012, April). Pedagogies integrating knowing and doing history: The role of the task and the teacher. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
  • van Hover, S. (2006). Teaching history in the Old Dominion: The impact of Virginia’s accountability reform on seven secondary beginning history teachers. In S. G. Grant (Ed.), Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States (pp. 195–220). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • van Hover, S. (2008). The professional development of social studies teachers. In L. S. Levstik & C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 352–372). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • VanSledright, B. A. (2002). In search of America’s past: Learning to read history in elementary school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • VanSledright, B. A. (2008). Narratives of nation-state, historical knowledge, and school history education. Review of Research in Education, 32, 109–146. doi:10.3102/0091732x07311065
  • VanSledright, B. A. (2011). The challenge of rethinking history education: On purposes, practices, and policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • VanSledright, B. A., Maggioni, L., & Reddy, K. (2011, April). Preparing teachers to teach historical thinking: The interplay between professional development programs and school-systems cultures. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Vogler, K. (2006). The impact of a high school graduation examination on Mississippi social studies teachers’ instructional practices. In S. G. Grant (Ed.), Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States (pp. 273–302). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37, 469–479. doi:10.3102/0013189x08327154
  • Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wiliam, D. (2010). Standardized testing and school accountability. Educational Psychologist, 45, 107–122. doi:10.1080/00461521003703060
  • Wilson, S. M., & Berne, S. J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209. doi:10.3102/0091732x024001173
  • Wineburg, S. S., Martin, D., & Monte-Sano, C. (2012). Reading like a historian: Teaching literacy in middle and high school history classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Yeager, E. A., & Davis, Jr., O. L. (Eds.). (2005). Wise social studies teaching in an age of high-stakes testing: Essays on classroom practices and possibilities. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.