A review and blueprint application of the inquiry design model

References

• Brown, R. H. (1996). Learning how to learn: The Amherst project and history education in the schools. The Social Studies, 87(6), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.1996.10114499
   Google Scholar
• Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2014). An instructional model to support problem-based historical inquiry: The persistent issues in history network. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1409
   Google Scholar
• C3Teachers. (n.d.). The inquiry design model. http://www.c3teachers.org/
   Google Scholar
• Davis, O. L. (2001). In pursuit of historical empathy. In O. L. Davis, E. Yeager, & S. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 1–12). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R. W. (2018). Old, new, and newer: Historical context of the new social studies (G. Scheurman & R. W. Evans, Eds.). Constructivism and the new social studies: A collection of guided inquiry lessons (pp. 21-54). Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, S. G. (2013). From inquiry arc to instructional practice: The potential of the C3 framework. Social Education, 77 (6), 322–326, 351. https://www.socialstudies.org/social-education/77/6/inquiry-arc-instructional-practice-potential-c3-framework
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, R. (2004). Madeline Hunter’s mastery teaching: Increasing instructional effectiveness in elementary and secondary schools (2nd ed.). Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (2015). Doing history: Investigations with children in elementary schools (5th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., Carmichael, D. L., & King, M. B. (2016). Authentic intellectual work: Improving teaching for rigorous learning. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S. (2005). Learning is a verb: The psychology of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scheurman, G. (2006). America as metaphor: Using arguments to teach about American identity. Magazine of History, 20(4), 27–35. Organization of American Historians. https://doi.org/10.1093/maghis/20.4.27.
   Google Scholar
• Scheurman, G. (2008). Poetry and postholes: Making authentic pedagogy deeper and more personal. Social Education, 72(7), 350–353. https://www.socialstudies.org/poetry-and-postholes-making-authentic-pedagogy-deeper-and-more-personal
   Google Scholar
• Scheurman, G. (2011). Cold vs. hot war: A model for building conceptual knowledge in history. Social Education, 76(1), 32–37. https://www.socialstudies.org/social-education/76/1/cold-vs-hot-war-model-building-conceptual-knowledge-history
   Google Scholar
• Scheurman, G. (2018a). Evanescence and permanence: The future of social studies in the rearview mirror (G. Scheurman & R. W. Evans, Eds). Constructivism and the new social studies: A collection of guided inquiry lessons(pp. 3-20). Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Scheurman, G. (2018b). Hiroshima: A model and template for creating document-based inquiry. In G. Scheurman & R. W. Evans (Eds.), Constructivism and the New Social Studies: A collection of guided inquiry lessons (pp. 221–258). Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Scheurman, G., & Newmann, F. M. (1998). Authentic intellectual work in social studies: Putting performance before pedagogy. Social Education, 62(1), 23–25. http://www.socialstudies.org/sites/default/files/publications/se/6201/620103.html
   Google Scholar
• Scheurman, G., & Reynolds, K. (2010). The history problem in curricular reform: A warning to constructivists from the new social studies movement In B. Slater-Stern (Ed.), The new social studies: People, projects, and perspectives (pp. 339–357). Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., & Grant, S. G. (2015). Teaching the college, career, and civic life (C3) framework: Exploring inquiry-based instruction in social studies. Bulletin 114. National Council for the Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., & Grant, S. G. (2018). Teaching the college, career, and civic life (C3) framework: Exploring inquiry-based instruction in social studies. (Part II). Bulletin 116. National Council for the Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., Grant, S. G., & Lee, J. (2019). Blueprinting an inquiry-based curriculum: Planning with the inquiry design model. National Council for the Social Studies and C3 Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., Lee, J., & Grant, S. G. (2018). Inquiry design model: Building inquiries in social studies. National Council for the Social Studies and C3 Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., Lee, J., & Grant, S. G. (2019). The Korean War and its legacy: Teaching about Korea through inquiry. National Council for the Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Vanfossen, P. J., & Shivley, J. M. (1997). Things that make you go” hmmm … ”: Creating inquiry problems in the elementary social studies classroom. The Social Studies, 88(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377999709603750
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Yeager, E., & Foster, S. (2001). The role of empathy in the development of historical understanding. In O. L. Davis, E. Yeager, & S. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 13–20). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar