“My thinking has changed but beliefs have not”: Motivated reasoning in learning to teach abortion

References

• Abelson, R. P. (1963). Computer simulation of “hot cognition. In S. S. Tomkins & S. Messick (Eds.), Computer simulation of personality: Frontier of psychological theory (pp. 277–298). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Andolina, M. W., & Conklin, H. G. (2021). Cultivating empathic listening in democratic education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(3), 390–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2021.1893240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., & Rooduijn, M. (2021). Hot politics? Affective responses to political rhetoric. American Political Science Review, 115(1), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2020). A review of educational responses to the “post-truth” condition: Four lenses on “post-truth” problems. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brief for Professors Mary Ann Glendon and O. Carter Snead as Amici Curiae In Support of Petitioners, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. (2022). https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/185180/20210729085701253_19-1392%20Amici%20Brief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brief of Amici Curiae the American Civil Liberties Union and the American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi in Support of Respondents, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. (2022). https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/192943/20210920132131770_19-1392%20Dobbs%20v%20Jackson%20Womens%20Health%20Amici%20Curiae%20Brief%20in%20Support%20of%20Respondents.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brief of Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, Samaritan’s Purse, Illinois Family Institute, Family Watch International, National Legal Foundation, International Conference of Evangelical Chaplain Endorsers, and Founding Freedoms Law Center In Support of Petitioners, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. (2022). https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/185303/20210806173425950_19-1392%20Amici%20Br%20BGEA%20et%20al.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brief of Equal Protection Constitutional Law Scholars Serena Mayeri, Melissa Murray, and Reva Siegel as Amici Curiae In Support of Respondents, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. (2022). https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/193048/20210920164113157_19-1392%20bsac%20Equal%20Protection%20Constitutional%20Law%20Scholars%20Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
   Google Scholar
• Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. 573 US 682. (2014). https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/13-354
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
   Google Scholar
• Colley, L. (2019). (Un)restricting feminism: High school students’ definitions of gender and feminism in the context of the historic struggle for women’s rights. Theory & Research in Social Education, 47(3), 426–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2019.1593268
   Google Scholar
• Colley, L., Reagan, L. J., & Riaño, C. R. (2022, July 28). Teaching the impact of overturning Roe vs. Wade [ Webinar]. National Council for the Social Studies, American Historical Association, Center for Civic Education. https://www.socialstudies.org/professional-learning/teaching-impact-overturning-roe-v-wade
   Google Scholar
• Crocco, M. S. (2004). Women and the social studies: The long rise and rapid fall of feminist activity in the national council of the social studies. In C. Woyshner, J. Watras, & M. S. Crocco (Eds.), Social education in the 20th century: Curriculum and context for citizenship (pp. 142–159). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Crocco, M. S., Halvorsen, A.-L., Jacobsen, R., & Segall, A. (2017). Teaching with evidence. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(7), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717702635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalinger, T., Thomas, K. B., Stansberry, S., & Xiu, Y. (2020). A mixed reality simulation offers strategic practice for pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 144, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. (2022). https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/19-1392
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, T. (1998). Deconstructing differences in African-American and European-American adolescents’ perspectives on U.S. history. Curriculum Inquiry, 28(4), 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/0362-6784.00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In G. Camilli, J. L. Green, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177–192). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R. W., Avery, P. A., & Pederson, P. V. (1999). Taboo topics: Cultural restraint on teaching social studies. The Social Studies, 90(5), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377999909602419
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, S., & Sutphin, L. (2022). Analyzing the impact on teacher preparedness as a result of using mursion as a risk-free microteaching experience for pre-service teachers. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(4), 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211067731
   Google Scholar
• Gantz, W. (1978, August 13–16). The movement of taboos: A message-oriented approach [ Paper presentation]. Association for Education in Journalism Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, H. J. (2017). Learning to be in the world with others: Difficult knowledge and social studies education. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, H. J., & Alvey, E. (2021). Exploring the emotional dynamics of a political discussion. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2020.1808550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, H. J., Segall, A., & Crocco, M. S. (2020). Accommodating emotion and affect in political discussions in classrooms. The Social Studies, 111(6), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2020.1758015
   Google Scholar
• Geller, R. C. (2020). “I can’t’t just let those things stand”: How social studies teachers make sense of political disclosure, classroom safety, and controversial issues in contentious times [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Geller, R. C., Gravell, J. D., Richardson, A., & Strang, S. A. (2022). When teachers learn through practice: Controversial issue discussions in mixed-reality simulations. Social Education, 86(2), 123–127.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstein, J., & Ward, A. (2022, May 2). Supreme court has voted to overturn abortion rights, draft opinion shows. Politico. https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, reimagining teacher education. Teachers & Teaching Theory & Practice, 15(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. (2024, May 1). Interactive map: US abortion policies and access after Roe. Author. https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/
   Google Scholar
• Hawke, C. (2022). U.S. Supreme court check-in: One monumental term rolls into another. Social Education, 86(5), 310–315.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203878880
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, R., Halvorsen, A. L., Frasier, A. S., Schmitt, A., Crocco, M., & Segall, A. (2018). Thinking deeply, thinking emotionally: How high school students make sense of evidence. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 232–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2018.1425170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, J. H. (2010). “Democracy is the devil’s snare”: Theological certainty in teacher education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(4), 618–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2010.10473441
   Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2018). Should marriage equality be taught as controversial post-obergefell v. Hodges? Teachers College Record, 120(8), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (Ed.). (2019). Unpacking fake news: An educator’s guide to navigating the media with students. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2017). Educating for democracy in a partisan age: Confronting the challenges of motivated reasoning and misinformation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216679817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, J., & Rich, M. D. (2018). Truth decay: A threat to policymaking and democracy. Rand Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2314.html
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzman, R. (2006). The civic (and pedagogical) virtue of recognizing reasonable disagreement. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34(2), 162–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2006.10473303
   Google Scholar
• Langer, G. (2023, May 9). More say politics, not the law, drive supreme court decisions: POLL. ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/politics-law-drive-supreme-court-decisions-poll/story?id=99168846
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00426.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luker, K. (1984). Abortion and the politics of motherhood. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, S. ( Host). (2022, June 22). Roe against Wade (Season 7, Number 4) [Audio podcast episode]. Slate. https://slate.com/podcasts/slow-burn/s7/roe-v-wade/e4/harry-blackmun-roe-v-wade-abortion-supreme-court
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, S. (2019). Learning to evaluate: An intervention in civic online reasoning. Computers & Education, 145, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mirra, N., & Garcia, A. (2022). Guns, schools, and democracy: Adolescents imagining social futures through speculative civic literacies. American Educational Research Journal, 59(2), 345–380. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312221074400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. (2012). A challenge for social studies educators: Increasing civility in schools and society by modeling civic virtues. The Social Studies, 103(4), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2011.596860
   Google Scholar
• Murray, M., & Shaw, K. (2024). Dobbs and democracy. Harvard Law Review, 137(3), 728–807.
   Google Scholar
• Murray-Everett, N. C., & Demoiny, S. B. (2022). Troubling “active”: Elementary teacher candidates’ framing of active vs. passive citizenship. Theory & Research in Social Education, 50(3), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2073852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). College, career, and civic life framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, J. L. (2021). Hard questions: Learning to teach controversial issues. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2022, May 17). Public opinion on abortion. Author. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/fact-sheet/public-opinion-on-abortion/#CHAPTER-h-views-on-abortion-1995-2021
   Google Scholar
• Philip, T. M., Souto-Manning, M., Anderson, L., Horn, I., Carter Andrews, D. J., Stillman, J., & Varghese, M. (2019). Making justice peripheral by constructing practice as “core”: How the increasing prominence of core practices challenges teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118798324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833. (1992). https://www.oyez.org/cases/1991/91-744
   Google Scholar
• Polikoff, M., Silver, D., Rapaport, A., Saavedra, A., & Garland, M. (2022). A house divided? What Americans really think about controversial topics in schools. University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2022). Document-based discussions in history: Orienting students to the discipline. In J. C. Lo (Ed.), Making classroom discussions work: Methods for quality dialogue in the social studies (pp. 106–121). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rethinking Schools. (2022). Reproductive justice and our classrooms. Author. https://rethinkingschools.org/articles/reproductive-justice-and-our-classrooms/
   Google Scholar
• Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113. (1973). https://www.oyez.org/cases/1971/70-18
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schmeichel, M. (2015). Skirting around critical feminist rationales for teaching women in social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2014.1002648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwinn, S. D. (2022). Reversing Roe. Social Education, 86(4), 285–290.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, M., Katz, D., & Grosland, T. (2015). Conceptualizing emotions in social studies education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(2), 147–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1034391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, M., & Levy, S. A. (2019). Emotions and teacher decision-making: An analysis of social studies teachers’ perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, K. M., & Martell, C. C. (2021). Five years later: How the 2016 U.S. presidential election and the #MeToo movement impacted feminist social studies teachers. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2021.1875092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddard, J. (2022). Difficult knowledge and history education. Pedagogy Culture & Society, 30(3), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1977982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traister, R. (2019). Good and mad: The revolutionary power of women’s anger. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Turtle Island Social Studies Collective. (2019). Beyond Pocahontas: Learning from indigenous women changemakers. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 31(3), 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Valenti, J. (2023a, September 30). The exceptions lie. Abortion, Every Day. https://jessica.substack.com/p/the-exceptions-lie
   Google Scholar
• Valenti, J. (2023b, March 1). The GOP is undoing democracy to ban abortion. Abortion, Every Day. https://jessica.substack.com/p/the-gop-is-undoing-democracy-to-ban
   Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 164–181). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vickery, A. E. (2017). “You excluded us for so long and now you want us to be patriotic?”: African American women teachers navigating the quandary of citizenship. Theory & Research in Social Education, 45(3), 318–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1282387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar