Exploring socioeconomic relationships from surface survey ceramics: New methodologies from Bronze-Age Benta Valley, Hungary

References

• Arthur, J. W. 2009. “Understanding Household Population through Ceramic Assemblage Formation: Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology Among the Gamo of Southwestern Ethiopia,” American Antiquity 74(1): 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artrusson, M. 2010. “Settlement Structure and Organisation,” in T. Earle and K. Kristiansen, eds., Organizing Bronze Age Societies. The Mediterranean, Central Europe, and Scandinavia Compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bóna I. 1975. “Die Mittlere Bronzezeit Ungarns und ihre Südöstlichen Beziehungen,” Archaeologica Hungarica, Vol. 49. Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Bóna I. 1991. “A Nagyrév Kultúra Településeiről—Über die Siedlungen der Nagyrév-Kultur,” A Tapolcai Városi Múzeum Közleményei 2: 73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Bóna I. 1992. “Bronzezeitliche Tell-Kulturen in Ungarn,” in W. Meier-Arendt, ed., Bronzezeit in Ungarn. Forschungen in Tell-Siedlungen an Donau und Theiss. Frankfurt am Main: Pytheas, 9–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bowser, B. 2000. “From Pottery to Politics: an Ethnoarchaeological Study of Political Factionalism, Ethnicity, and Domestic Pottery Style in the Ecuadorian Amazon,” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7(3): 219–248. doi: 10.1023/A:1026510620824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budden, S., and J. Sofaer. 2009. “Non-Discursive Knowledge and the Construction of Identity of Potters, Potting and Performance at the Bronze Age Tell of Százhalombatta, Hungary,” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19: 203–220. doi: 10.1017/S0959774309000274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilton, E. 1999. “Material Meanings and Meaningful Materials: An Introduction,” in E. Chilton, ed., Material Meanings. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Crown, P. L. 2007. “Life Histories of Pots and Potters: Situating the Individual in Archaeology,” American Antiquity 72(4): 677–690. doi: 10.2307/25470440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, B. 2003. “Societies and Territories in Iron Age Wessex,” in I. Bourgeois and B. Bourgeois, eds., Bronze Age and Iron Age Communities in North-Western Europe. Brussels: Archaeologia Protohistorica 10, 111–133.
   Google Scholar
• DeMarrais, E., L. Castillo, and T. Earle. 1996. “Ideology, Materialization, and Power Strategies,” Current Anthropology 37 (1): 15–31. doi: 10.1086/204472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinnyés, I., K. Kővári, Z. Lovag, S. Tettemanti, J. Topál, and I. Torma. 1986. “Pest Megye Régészeti Topográfiája. A Budai és Szentendrei járás (XIII/1.),” Magyarország Régészeti Topográfiája 7. Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, P., W. Parkinson, A. Gyucha, and R. Yerkes. 2013. “Coming Together, Falling Apart: A Multiscalar Approach to Prehistoric Aggregation and Interaction on the Great Hungarian Plain,” in J. Birch, ed., From Prehistoric Villages to Cities: Settlement Aggregation and Community Transformation. New York: Routledge, 44–62.
   Google Scholar
• Dunnell, R. C., and J. F. Simek. 1995. “Artifact Size and Plowzone Processes,” Journal of Field Archaeology 22: 305–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, T., and M. J. Kolb. 2010. “Regional Settlement Patterns,” in T. Earle and K. Kristiansen, eds., Organizing Bronze Age Societies. The Mediterranean, Central Europe, and Scandinavia Compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–86.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, T., A. Kreiter, C. Klehm, J. Ferguson, and M. Vicze. 2011. “Bronze Age Ceramic Economy: the Benta Valley, Hungary,” European Journal of Archaeology 14: 419–440. doi: 10.1179/146195711798356746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, T., and K. Kristiansen, eds. 2010. Organizing Bronze Age Societies. The Mediterranean, Central Europe, and Scandinavia Compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, T., V. Kiss, G. Kulcsár, G., V. Szeverényi, T. Polányi, J. Czebreszuk, M. Jaeger, and P. Lukasz. 2012. “Bronze Age Landscapes in the Benta Valley,” Hungarian Archaeology E-Journal Winter 2012: 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, T., G. Kulcsár, V. Kiss, G. Serlegi, and V. Szeverényi. 2014. “Recent Results from the Bronze Age Research into the Benta Valley,” Hungarian Archaeology E-Journal Winter 2014: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Fischl, K. P., V. Kiss, G. Kulcsár, and V. Szeverényi. 2013. “Transformations in the Carpathian Basin around 1600 B.C. in 1600—Cultural change in the Shadow of the Thera-Eruption?—Kultureller Umbruch im Schatten des Thera-Ausbruchs?” 4. Mitteldeutscher Archäologentag vom 14. bis 16. Oktober 2011 in Halle (Saale). 4th Archaeological Conference of Central Germany October 14–16, 2011 in Halle (Saale). Band: Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle 9, 355–373.
   Google Scholar
• Flannery, K. 1976. The Early Mesoamerican Village. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, H. J. 1988. “The origins of Milk and Wool Production in the Old World: A Zooarchaeological Perspective from the Central Balkans,” Current Anthropology 29(4): 573–593. doi: 10.1086/203676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, H. J. 2005. “A Reconsideration of the Secondary Products Revolution: 20 Years of Research in the Central Balkans,” in J. Mulville and A. Outram, eds., The Zooarchaeology of Milk and Fats (Proceedings of the 9th ICAZ Conference, Durham 2002). Oxford: Oxbow Press: 14–31.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, A. F. 2000. European Societies in the Bronze Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herbich, I. 1987. “Learning Patterns, Potter Interaction, and Ceramic Style Among the Luo in Kenya,” African Archaeological Review 5: 193–204. doi: 10.1007/BF01117093
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, J. A., and M. B. Hagstrum. 1999. “New Approaches to Ceramic Use and Discard: Cooking Pottery from the Peruvian Andes in Ethnoarchaeological Perspective,” Latin American Antiquity 10(1): 25–46. doi: 10.2307/972209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodder, I., and C. Orton. 1976. Spatial Analysis in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. A. J. 2014. “The Correlation of Surface and Subsurface Artifacts: A Test Case from Late and Terminal Classic Popola, Yucatan, Mexico,” Journal of Field Archaeology 39: 276–291. doi: 10.1179/0093469014Z.00000000091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, V. 2011. “The Role of the Danube in the Early and Middle Bronze age in the Carpathian Basin,” in G. Kovács and G. Kulcsár, eds., Ten Thousand Years along the Middle Danube. Life and Early Communities from Prehistory to History. Varia Archaeologica Hungaria XXVI. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 211–239.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, V. 2012. “Central European and Southeastern Alpine Influences upon Western Transdanubia's Early and Middle Bronze Age,” in P. Antreiter, E. Bánffy, L. Bartosiewicz, W. Meid and C. Metznel-Nebelsick, eds., Archaeological, Cultural and Linguistic Heritage. Festschrift for Erzsébet Jerem in Honour of her 70th Birthday. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Klehm, C. 2009. Shifting Strategies in the Benta Valley: Settlements, Specialization, and Stratification in Bronze Age Hungary. MA Thesis, University of Texas, Austin, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, C. 1997. Pottery in Rajasthan: Ethnoarchaeology in Two Indian Cities. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiter, A. 2007. Technological Choices and Material Meanings in Early and Middle Bronze Age Hungary. Understanding the Active Role of Material Culture through Ceramic Analysis. BAR International Series 1604. Oxford: Archaeopress.
   Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, K. 2000. “The Emergence of European Communities: Household, Settlement and Territory in Later Prehistory (2300–300 B.C.),” in I. Poroszlai and M. Vicze, eds., Százhalombatta Archeological Expedition-Field season 1998. SAX Annual Report 1. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, K., and T. B. Larsson. 2005. The Rise of Bronze Age Society: Travels, Transmissions, and Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kulcsár, G. 2011. “Untangling the Early Bronze Age in the Middle Danube Valley,” in G. Kovács and G. Kulcsár, eds., Ten Thousand Years along the Middle Danube. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 179–210.
   Google Scholar
• Kulcsár, G. 2012. “Siedlingen Entlang des Kapos-Tals (Sud-Transdanubien) zu Beginn der Bronzezeit,” in P. Antreiter, E. Bánffy, L. Bartosiewicz, W. Meid and C. Metznel-Nebelsick, eds., Archaeological, Cultural and Linguistic Heritage. Festschrift for Erzsébet Jerem in Honour of her 70th Birthday. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 349–362.
   Google Scholar
• Lesure, R. G. 1998. “Vessel Form and Function in an Early Formative Ceramic Assemblage from Coastal Mexico,” Journal of Field Archaeology 25(1): 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nováki, G. 1952. “Fejér Megye őskori Földvárai,” Archaeologiai Értesítő 79: 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Nyíri, B. 2007. Dunaújváros-Rácdomb Bronzkori Telepe. Kora Bronzkori Ház, Valamint az Ehhez Tartozó Objektumok, Szintek Vizsgálata. Bronze Age Settlement of Dunaújváros-Rácdomb. Analysis of an Early Bronze Age Household and the Related Features and Strata. Unpublished MA thesis, Eötvös Loránd Science University (ELTE), Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Orton, C. 2000. Sampling in Archaeology. Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pap, D., Z. Bernert, S. Évinger, G. Tóth, and G. Gyenis. 2008. “Érd-Hosszúföldek Középsőbronzkori Temető Embertani Anyaga—the Skeletal Material of the Érd-Hosszúföldek Site from the Middle Bronze Age,” Anthropologiai Közlemények 49: 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, W., R. Yerkes, A. Gyucha, A. Sarris, M. Morris, and R. Salisbury. 2010. “Early Copper Age Settlements in the Körös Region of the Great Hungarian Plain,” Journal of Field Archaeology 35: 164–183. doi: 10.1179/009346910X12707321520675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poroszlai, I. 1999–2000. “Die Grabungen in der Tell-Siedlungen von Bölcske-Vörösgyűrű,” Acta Archeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 51: 111–145.
   Google Scholar
• Poroszlai, I. 2000. “Excavation Campaigns at the Bronze Age Tell Site at Százhalombatta-Földvár. I. 1989–1991, II. 1991–1993,” in I. Poroszlai and M. Vicze, eds., Százhalombatta Archeological Expedition-Field season 1998. SAX Annual Report. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 113–173.
   Google Scholar
• Poroszlai, I., and M. Vicze. 2000. Százhalombatta Archeological Expedition. SAX Annual Report 1-Field season 1998. Budapest: Archaeolingua.
   Google Scholar
• Poroszlai, I., and M. Vicze. 2005. Százhalombatta Archeological Expedition. Százhalombatta Archeological Expedition. SAX Annual Report 2. Budapest: Archaeolingua.
   Google Scholar
• Raczky, P., E. Hertelendi, and F. Horváth. 1992. “Zur absoluten Datierung der bronzezeitlichen Tell-Kulturen in Ungarn,” in W. Meier-Arendt, ed., Bronzezeit in Ungarn. Forschungen in Tell-Siedlungen an Donau und Theiss. Frankfurt am Main: Ausstellungskatalog, 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Redman, C. 1987. “Surface Collection, Sampling, and Research Design: A Retrospective,” American Antiquity 52: 249–265. doi: 10.2307/281779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman, C., and P. J. Watson. 1970. “Systematic, Invasive Surface Collection,” American Antiquity 35: 279–291. doi: 10.2307/278339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánta, G. 2010. “Settlements of the Tumulus Culture in Hungary,” Antaeus 31–32: 513–528.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, A. 1991. “Interpreting Artefact Scatters: An Introduction,” in A. Schofield, ed., Interpreting Artefact Scatters: Contributions to Ploughzone Archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sherratt, A. 1981. “Plough and Pastoralism: Aspects of the Secondary Products Revolution,” in I. Hodder, G. Isaac and N. Hammond, eds., Pattern of the Past: Studies in Honour of David Clarke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 261–305.
   Google Scholar
• Sherratt, A. 1997. Economy and Society in Prehistoric Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, M. 1995. “Reliability of Archaeological Records on Cultivated Surfaces: A Michigan Case Study,” Journal of Field Archaeology 22: 475–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siklósi, Z. 2004. “Prestige Goods in the Neolithic of the Carpathian Basin: Material Manifestations of Social Differentiation,” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hung. 55: 1–62. doi: 10.1556/AArch.55.2004.1-2.1
   Google Scholar
• Siklósi, Z. 2013. “Traces of Social Inequality and Ritual in the Late Neolithic of the Great Hungarian Plain,” in A. Anders and G. Kulcsár, eds., Moments in Time: Papers Presented to Pál Raczky on His 60th Birthday. Budapest: L'Harmattan, 421–436.
   Google Scholar
• Sinopoli, C. 1991. Approaches to Archaeological Ceramics. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sofaer, J. 2006. “Pots, Houses and Metal: Technological Relations at the Bronze Age Tell at Százhalombatta,” Oxford Journal of Archaeology 25: 127–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0092.2006.00253.x
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, J. 1996. “Plowzone Sampling in Denmark,” Antiquity 70: 368–392. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00083332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sümegi, P., and E. Bodor. 2005. “Geoarchaeological and Archaeobotanical Investigations in the Valley of the Benta (Békás) Creek,” in I. Poroszlai and M. Vicze, eds., Százhalombatta Archeological Expedition. SAX Annual Report 2. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 209–235.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó, G. 1992. “A Dunaföldvár-Kálvária tell-település kora bronzkori rétegsora—Die Schichtenreihe der Tellsiedlung von Dunaföldvár-Kálvária zur frühen Bronzezeit,” Wosinszky Mór Múzeum Évkönyve 17: 35–182.
   Google Scholar
• Szeverényi, V., and G. Kulcsár. 2012. “Middle Bronze Age Settlement and Society in Central Hungary,” in M. Jaeger, J. Czebreszuk and P. K. Fischl, eds., Enclosed Space-Open Society. Contact and Exchange in the Context of Bronze Age Fortified Settlements in Central Europe. Studien zur Archäologie in Ostmitteleuropa Band 9. Bonn: Poznan, 287–351.
   Google Scholar
• Tolstoy, P., and S. Fish. 1975. “Surface and Subsurface Evidence for Community Size at Coapexco, Mexico,” Journal of Field Archaeology 2: 97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Tóth, K. 1999. “Kora bronzkori edénylelet Kecskemét-Csukáséren—Ein frühbronzezeitliche Gefässdepot auf dem Fundort Kecskemét-Csukásér,” Móra Ferenc Múzeum Évkönyve—Studia Archaeologica 5: 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Underhill, A. P. 2003. “Investigating Variation in Organization of Ceramic Production: An Ethnoarchaeological Study in Guizhou, China,” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 10(3): 203–275. doi: 10.1023/A:1026035706326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Váczi, G., and M. Stibrányi. 2008. “Neue Erdburgen der Vatya-Kultur im Komitat Fejér,” Alba Regia 37: 205–212.
   Google Scholar
• Vékony, G. 2003. “The History of Archaeological Fieldwork in Hungary,” in Z. Visy, ed., Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millennium. Budapest: Ministry of Cultural Heritage, 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Vicze, M. 2000. “Background Information to the Field Survey,” in I. Poroszlai and M. Vicze, eds., Százhalombatta Archeological Expedition. SAX Annual Report 1—Field season 1998. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 119–123.
   Google Scholar
• Vicze, M. 2013. “Middle Bronze Age Households at Százhalombatta-Földvár,” in A. Anders and G. Kulcsár, eds., Moments in Time. ősrégészeti Tanulmányok. Prehist. Stud. 1. Budapest: L'Harmattan, 757–769.
   Google Scholar
• Vicze, M., T. Earle, and M. Artursson. 2005. “Bronze Age Site Gazetteer: Benta Valley, Hungary,” in I. Poroszlai and M. Vicze, eds., Százhalombatta Archeological Expedition. SAX Annual Report 2. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 237–250.
   Google Scholar
• Yerkes, R., W. Parkinson, A. Sarris, A. Gyucha, M. Hardy, and L. Catanoso. 2007. “Geophysical and Geochemical Investigations at Two Early Copper Age Settlements in the Körös River Valley, Southeastern Hungary,” Geoarchaeology 22: 845–871. doi: 10.1002/gea.20198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar