Women in the Lab, Men in the Field? Correlations between Gender and Research Topics at Three Major Archaeology Conferences

References

• Bardolph, D. N. 2014. “A Critical Evaluation of Recent Gendered Publishing Trends in American Archaeology.” American Antiquity 79 (3): 522–540. https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.79.3.522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardolph, D. N. 2018. “Controlling the Narrative: A Comparative Examination of Gendered Publishing Trends in the SCA and Beyond.” California Archaeology 10 (2): 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/1947461X.2018.1535813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, J., E. Gjesfjeld, and S. Chrisomalis. 2021. “Prestige or Perish: Publishing Decisions in Academic Archaeology.” American Antiquity 86 (4): 669–695. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2021.64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blevins, C., and Mullen L. 2015. “Jane, John … Leslie? A Historical Method for Algorithmic Gender Prediction.” DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly 9 (3). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/3/000223/000223.html
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. M. 2018. “Gender, Race, and Mentorship: A Perspective from California Archaeology.” California Archaeology 10 (2): 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1947461X.2018.1535814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp, S. L. 2019. “Fieldwork and Parenting in Archaeology.” In Mothering from the Field: The Impact of Motherhood on Site-Based Research, edited by B. M. Muhammad, and M.-A. Neuilly, 27–42. New Brunswick, Camden, and Newark, New Jersey, and London: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caprile, M., E. Addis, C. Castaño, I. Klinge, M. Larios, D. Meulders, J. Müller, et al. 2012. “Meta-Analysis of Gender and Science Research. Synthesis Report.” European Commission, https://doi.org/10.2777/75176.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J., S. Gerrish, C. Wang, J. L. Boyd-Graber, and D. M. Blei. 2009. “Reading Tea Leaves: How Humans Interpret Topic Models.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22: 288–296.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, D. Z. 2021. “The Academy, and Women: Finding One’s Own Path.” Heritage 4 (3): 1725–1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4030096.
   Google Scholar
• Cislak, A., M. Formanowicz, and T. Saguy. 2018. “Bias Against Research on Gender Bias.” Scientometrics 115: 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2667-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen, C. 1994. Women in Archaeology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cramb, J., B. T. Ritchison, C. S. Hadden, Q. Zhang, E. Alarcón-Tinajero, X. Chen, K. C. Jones, T. Jones, K. Napora, M. Veres and V. D. Thompson. 2022. “The Changing Profile of Tenure-Track Faculty in Archaeology.” Advances in Archaeological Practice 10 (4): 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2022.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulkerson, T. J., and S. Tushingham. 2019. “Who Dominates the Discourses of the Past? Gender, Occupational Affiliation, and Multivocality in North American Archaeology Publishing.” American Antiquity 84: 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2019.35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. M. 1983. “Gender Bias in Archaeology: A Cross-Cultural Perspective.” In The Socio-Politics of Archaeology, edited by J. M. Gero, D. M. Lacy, and M. L. Blakey, 51–57. Amherst, MA: Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. M. 1994. “Excavation Bias and the Woman at Home Ideology.” Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 5: 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.1994.5.1.37.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 2004. “It’s Like One of Those Puzzles: Conceptualising Gender among Bugis.” Journal of Gender Studies 13: 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958923042000217800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. C., D. Anderson, M. Broaddus, and K. Young. 2006. “Gender Stereotyping and Under-Representation of Female Characters in 200 Popular Children’s Picture Books: A Twenty-First Century Update.” Sex Roles 55: 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9128-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath-Stout, L. E. 2020a. “Guest Editorial Introduction: Gender, Equity, and the Peer Review Process at the Journal of Field Archaeology.” Journal of Field Archaeology 45 (3): 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2020.1719295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath-Stout, L. E. 2020b. “Who Writes About Archaeology? An Intersectional Study of Authorship in Archaeological Journals.” American Antiquity 85 (3): 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2020.28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath-Stout, L. E., and C. L. Jalbert. 2023. “Funding in the “Field:” An Analysis of Demographics and Methods in National Science Foundation Archaeology Grants (1955–2020).” Journal of Field Archaeology 48 (2): 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2022.2154999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretzler, I., and B. Marwick. 2015. “Investigating Archaeologists’ Engagement with Feminist Theory Using Textual Macroanalysis: 25 Years After Chacmool 1989.” In BREAKING BARRIERS: Proceedings of the 47^th Annual Chacmool Archaeological Conference November 7-9 2014, edited by R. Crook, K. Edwards, and C. Hughes, 158–168. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: The Chacmool Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary.
   Google Scholar
• Leighton, M. 2020. “Myths of Meritocracy, Friendship, and Fun Work: Class and Gender in North American Academic Communities.” American Anthropologist 122: 444–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, M. n.d. Gender: Predict Gender from Names using Historical Data. R Package Version 0.5. 2. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lippa, R. A. 2005. Gender, Nature, and Nurture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, B. 2017. “Computational Reproducibility in Archaeological Research: Basic Principles and a Case Study of Their Implementation.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 24: 424–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-015-9272-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, B., C. Boettiger, and L. Mullen. 2018. “Packaging Data Analytical Work Reproducibly Using R (and Friends).” The American Statistician 72: 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihaljević, H., M. Tullney, L. Santamarı́a, and C. Steinfeldt. 2019. “Reflections on Gender Analyses of Bibliographic Corpora.” Frontiers in Big Data 2: 29. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00029.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mimno, D., and Lee, M. 2014. “Low-Dimensional Embeddings for Interpretable Anchor-Based Topic Inference.” In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP): 1319–1328. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1138
   Google Scholar
• Miner, J. B. 1922. “An Aid to the Analysis of Vocational Interests.” The Journal of Educational Research 5: 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1922.10879258.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, S. 2007. “On Disciplinary Culture: Archaeology as Fieldwork and Its Gendered Associations.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14: 235–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostapenko, L., C. Schonhardt-Bailey, J. W. Sublette, D. S. Smink, and N. Y. Osman. 2018. “Textual Analysis of General Surgery Residency Personal Statements: Topics and Gender Differences.” Journal of Surgical Education 75: 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M., B. Stewart, D. Tingley, K. Benoit, M. B. Stewart, L. Rcpp, R. Imports MatrixStats, and N. KernSmooth. 2019. Package ‘stm.’.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. E., B. M. Stewart, D. Tingley, C. Lucas, J. Leder-Luis, S. K. Gadarian, B. Albertson, and D. G. Rand. 2014. “Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses.” American Journal of Political Science 58: 1064–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrı́guez-Álvarez, X., and Lozano, S. 2018. “Gender Balance in the Scientific Production of the Atapuerca Archaeological and Palaeontological Research Project.” Journal of Anthropological Sciences 96: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4436/jass.96002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A. 2016. “The Intellectual Base of Archaeological Research 2004–2013: A Visualisation and Analysis of its Disciplinary Links, Networks of Authors and Conceptual Language.” Internet Archaeology 42), https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.42.8.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. 2007. “Visa Stories: Human Rights, Structural Violence and Ethical Globalisation.” Archaeologies 3 (2): 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-007-9020-1.
   Google Scholar
• Speakman, R. J., C. S. Hadden, M. H. Colvin, J. Cramb, K. C. Jones, T. W. Jones, I. Lulewicz, K. G. Napora, K. L. Reinberger, B. T. Ritchison, A. R. Edwards, and V. D. Thompson. 2018. “Market Share and Recent Hiring Trends in Anthropology Faculty Positions.” PLOS ONE 13 (9): e0202528. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet, G., and D. C. Geary. 2022. “Sex Differences in Adolescents’ Occupational Aspirations: Variations Across Time and Place.” PLOS ONE 17: e0261438. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, R., J. Rounds, and P. I. Armstrong. 2009. “Men and Things, Women and People: A Meta-Analysis of Sex Differences in Interests.” Psychological Bulletin 135: 859. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M., C. Bailey, C. Tobin, and N. Bradshaw. 2019. “Gender Differences in Research Areas, Methods and Topics: Can People and Thing Orientations Explain the Results?” Journal of Informetrics 13: 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, D. D., M. Menon, M. Menon, B. C. Spatta, E. V. Hodges, and D. G. Perry. 2010. “The Intrapsychics of Gender: A Model of Self-Socialization.” Psychological Review 117: 601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomášková, S. 2011. “Landscape for a Good Feminist. An Archaeological Review.” Archaeological Dialogues 18 (1): 109–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203811000158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushingham, S., T. Fulkerson, and K. Hill. 2017. “The Peer Review Gap: A Longitudinal Case Study of Gendered Publishing and Occupational Patterns in a Female-Rich Discipline, Western North America (1974–2016).” PLOS ONE 12 (11): e0188403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. 1996. “How we Find Ourselves: Identity Development and Two Spirit People.” Harvard Educational Review 66: 303–318. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.2.n551658577h927h4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y. J. 2008. “Gender Disparity in STEM Disciplines: A Study of Faculty Attrition and Turnover Intentions.” Research in Higher Education 49: 607–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9097-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar