Theorizing Backdirt: Between Contemporary Archaeology and a Meta-Critique

References

• Bradley, R. 2015. “Repeating the Unrepeatable Experiment.” In Material Evidence: Learning from Archaeological Practice, edited by R. Chapman, and A. Wylie, 23–41. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carandini, A. 2000. Storie Dalla Terra. Manuale di Scavo Archeologico. Torino: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, D. 2019. Antiguidades, Gabinetes e Colecionadores: em torno da Arqueologia, no século XVIII em Portugal. M.A diss., University of Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, G. 2009. “History and Archaeology, the History of Archaeology, and the Archaeology of Archaeology.” In Die Mittelalterliche Stadt Erforschen – Archäologie und Geschichte im Dialog – Beiträge der Tagung “Geschichte und Archäologie: Disziplinäre Interferenzen”, vom 7. bis 9. Februar 2008 in Zürich, edited by A. Baeriswyl, G. Descoeudres, M. Stercken, and D. Wild, 43–52. Schweizerischer Burgerverein: Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, G. 2011. “Reflections on the Archaeology of Archaeological Excavation.” Archaeological Dialogues 18 (1): 18–26. doi:10.1017/S1380203811000067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certini, G., and R. Scalenghe. 2011. “Anthropogenic Soils are the Golden Spikes for the Anthropocene.” The Holocene 21: 1269–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. 1998. “Archaeology at the Edge of Chaos: Further Towards Reflexive Excavation Methodologies.” Assemblage 3.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, H., O. Harris, C. Jones, and P. Richardson. 2012. “Reconsidering Fieldwork, an Introduction: Confronting Tensions in Fieldwork and Theory.” In Reconsidering Archaeological Fieldwork, edited by H. Cobb, O. Harris, C. Jones, and P. Richardson, 1–14. Boston: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Diniz, M., A. Martins, C. Neves, and J. M. Arnaud. 2017. “Vila Nova de São Pedro (Azambuja), no 3.° Milénio, um Sítio Calcolítico no Ocidente Peninsular – Contributos Para um Debate.” In Arqueologia em Portugal – 2017: Estado da Questão, edited by J. M. Arnaud, and A. Martins, 591–604. Lisbon: Associação dos Arqueólogos Portugueses.
   Google Scholar
• Edgeworth, M. 2011. “Excavation as a Ground of Archaeological Knowledge.” Archaeological Dialogues 18 (1): 44–46. doi:10.1017/S1380203811000109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgeworth, M. 2014. “The Relationship Between Archaeological Stratigraphy and Artificial Ground and its Significance in the Anthropocene.” Geological Society 395 (1): 91–108. doi:10.1144/SP395.3.
   Google Scholar
• Edgeworth, M. 2016. “Grounded Objects. Archaeology and Speculative Realism.” Archaeological Dialogues 23 (1): 93–113. doi:10.1017/S138020381600012X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabião, C. 1997. “Percursos da Arqueologia Clássica em Portugal: Da Sociedade Archeologica Lusitana (1849-1857) ao Moderno Projecto de Conimbriga (1964-1971).” In La Cristalización del Pasado: Génesis y Desarrollo del Marco Institucional de la Arqueología en España coordinated by G. Mora and M. Díaz-Andreu, 105–123. Málaga: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Málaga.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, D. 1993. “The Excavator: Creator or Destroyer?” Antiquity 67: 875–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, S., and P. Hoare. 2012. “The Stratigraphic Status of the Anthropocene.” The Holocene 12 (22): 1491–1494.
   Google Scholar
• Gnecco, C. 2013. “Digging Alternative Archaeologies.” In Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity, edited by A. González-Ruibal, 67–78. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, R., and M. Schiffer. 1981. Modern Material Culture the Archaeology of Us. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gusmão, A. 1944. Catálogo da Correspondência Dirigida a Frei Manuel do Cenáculo Villas-Boas. Évora: Biblioteca Pública e Arquivo Distrital de Évora.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, E. C. 2014. “Archaeological Stratigraphy. A Paradigm for the Anthropocene.” Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1: 105–109.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R., and J. Schofield. 2010. After Modernity: Archaeological Approaches to the Contemporary Past. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I. 1997. “Always Momentary, Fluid and Flexible: Towards a Reflexive Excavation Methodology.” Antiquity 71: 691–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, V. 2004. Soils in Archaeological Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holtorf, C. 2002. “Excavations at Monte da Igreja Near Évora (Portugal), from the Life-History of a Monument to re-Uses of Ancient Objects.” Journal of Iberian Archaeology 4: 177–201.
   Google Scholar
• Kolen, J. 2011. “A new Empiricism. Excavating at the Start of the 21st Century.” Archaeological Dialogues 18: 30–41. doi:10.1017/S1380203811000080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, G. 2001a. Critical Approaches to Fieldwork. Contemporary and Historical Archaeological Practice. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, G. 2001b. “Destruction and the Rhetoric of Excavation.” Norwegian Archaeological Review 34: 35–46. doi: 10.1080/00293650119347.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, G. 2015. “Evidence of What? On the Possibilities of Archaeological Interpretation.” In Material Evidence: Learning from Archaeological Practice, edited by R. Chapman, and A. Wylie, 311–323. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, K. 2020. Vital Decomposition: Soil Practitioners and Life Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães, A. P. 2021. A Terra Sigillata da Oficina 1. Escavações de 1956-1961 e 2008-2009. Lisboa: Museu Nacional de Arqueologia/Imprensa Nacional Casa da Moeda.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, A., C. Neves, M. Diniz, and J. M. Arnaud. 2019. “O Povoado Calcolítico de Vila Nova de São Pedro (Azambuja). Notas Sobre as Campanhas de Escavação de 2017 e 2018.” Arqueologia e História 69: 133–167.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, B. 2011. “Archaeology and the Unstoppable Excavation Machine. A Swedish Point of View.” Archaeological Dialogues 18: 26–29. doi: 10.1017/S1380203811000079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie, F. 1904. Methods and Aims in Archaeology. London: Macmillan and Co. Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rathje, W., and C. Murphy. 1992. Rubbish!: The Archaeology of Garbage. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Roosevelt, C., P. Cobb, E. Moss, B. Olson, and S. Ünlüsoy. 2015. “Excavation is Destruction Digitization: Advances in Archaeological Practice.” Journal of Field Archaeology 40: 325–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salisbury, R. 2012. “Engaging with Soil, Past and Present.” Journal of Material Culture 17: 23–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnapp, A. 1982. ““Archéologie et Tradition Académique en Europe aux XVIIIe et XIXe Siècles. Annales.” Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 5-6: 760–777.
   Google Scholar
• Schnapp, A. 1996. The Discovery of the Past. London: British Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Schnapp, A. 2002. “Between Antiquarians and Archaeologists — Continuities and Ruptures.” Antiquity 76: 134–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnapp, A. 2013. “Towards a Universal History of Antiquarians.” Complutum 24 (2): 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, M. 2015. “‘Paradigm Lost’: On the State of Typology Within Archaeological Theory.” In Paradigm Found: Archaeological Theory Present, Past and Future: Essays in Honour of Evzˇen Neustupný, edited by K. Kristiansen, L. Sˇmejda, J. Turek, and E. Neustupný, 84–94. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
   Google Scholar
• Syvitski, J., and A. Kettner. 2011. “Sediment Flux and the Anthropocene.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 369: 957–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, M. 1956. Archaeology from the Earth. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witmore, C. 2013. “Which Archaeology? A Question of Chronopolitics.” In Reclaiming Archaeology. Beyond the Tropes of Modernity, edited by A. González-Ruibal, 130–144. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yarrow, T. 2003. “Artefactual Persons: The Relational Capacities of Persons and Things in the Practice of Excavation.” Norwegian Archaeological Review 36: 65–73.
   Google Scholar
• Yarrow, T. 2008. “In Context: Meaning, Materiality and Agency in the Process of Archaeological Recording.” In Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach, edited by C. Knappett and L. Malafouris, 121–137. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74711-8_7
   Google Scholar