Ethical and Appropriate High-Stakes Test Preparation in Middle School: Five Methods That Matter

References

• America Educational Research Association.(2000). AERA position statements high-stakes testing in preK—12 education. Washington DC : AERA. Retrieved January 19, 2007, from http://www.aera.net/
   Google Scholar
• Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2002, March 28). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Retrieved May 25, 2005, from http://epaa.asu/epaa/v10n18/
   Google Scholar
• Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2003).The lessons of high-stakes testing. Educational Leadership, 61(3), 31–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arhar, J. M. (2003). No child left behind and middle level education: A look at research, policy, and practice. Middle School Journal, 34(5), 46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Brimijoin, K. (2005). Differentiation and high-stakes testing: An oxymoron? Theory Into Practice, 44(3),254–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushweller, K. (1997). Teaching to the test. The American School BoardJournal, 184(9), 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, H. K. (2007). Making room for the middle grades: High-stakes teaching in an era of high-stakes testing. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 1(1). Retrieved July 26, 2007, from http://www.ecu.edu/cs-educ/joci/index.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. (1999). High-stakes harm. Rethinking Schools, 13(3), 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S. N., & Clark, D. C. (2001). The challenge of curricular and instructional improvement in an era of high-stakes testing. Middle School Journal, 33(2),52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Costigan, A. T., & Crocco, M. S. (2004). Learning to teach in an age of accountability. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L. (2005). Teaching for the test: How and why test preparation is appropriate. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Defending standardized testing (pp. 159–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). What's at stake in high-stakes testing? Brown University Child and Adolescent Behavior Letter, 18(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Rustique-Forrester, E. (2005). The consequences of student testing for teaching and teacher quality. In J. L. Herman & E. H. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement, 104th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2 (pp. 289–319). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Durham, G. (2007). Teaching test-taking skills. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. A., & Cook, C. M. (2006). Testing vs. teaching: The perceived impact of assessment demands on middle grades instructional practices. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 29(7). Retrieved July 26, 2007, from http://www.nmsa.org/Publications/RMLEOnline/Articles/Vol29No7
   Google Scholar
• French, D. (2003). A new vision of authentic assessment to overcome the flaws in high stakes testing. Middle School Journal, 35(1), 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, C. W. (2007). Reclaiming assessment. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Gulek, C. (2003). Preparing for high-stakes testing. Theory into Practice, 42(1), 42–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haladyna, T. M., Nolen, S. B., & Haas, N. S. (1991). Raising standardized achievement test scores and the origins of test score pollution. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, F. M., & Brigham, F. (2000). How kids pay for high-stakes testing. The Education Digest, 66(3), 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. W., & Davis, G. A. (2000). Turning points 2000: Educating adolescents in the 21st century. New York & Westerville, OH: Teachers College Press & National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• Johannessen, L. R., & Kahn, E. A. (2001). How to prepare students for high-stakes test and still live with your conscience! Paper presented at the annual fall conference of the Illinois Association of Teachers of English, Elmhurst, IL. ( ERIC Document Service No. ED 466 802)
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Jones, B. D., & Hargrove, T. Y. (2003). The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, J. S. (2000).Are high-stakes tests taking control? Schools in the Middle, 9(7), 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kronowitz, E. L. (2008). The teacher's guide to success. Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, J. A. (2001). Succeeding against the odds in English/. EnglishJournal, 91(1),37–42.
   Google Scholar
• LaRocque, M. (2007). Closing the achievement gap: The experience of a middle school. Clearinghouse, 80(4), 157–161.
   Google Scholar
• L'Esperance, M. E., Strahan, D. B., Farrington, V., & Anderson, P. J. (2003). Raising achievement: Project genesis, a significant school model. Westerville, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Libresco, A. S. (2005). How she stopped worrying and learned to love the test … sort of. In E. A. Yeager & O. L. Davis Jr., (Eds.), Wise social studies teaching in an age of high-stakes testing (pp. 33–50). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, R. L., & Miller, M. D. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Lipka, R. L. (2004, April). High-stakes testing. Middle Level Education Research Policy Brief. Retrieved August 15, 2007, from http://www.rmle.pdx.edu/docs/policy%20brief_highstakestest.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McEwin, K., Dickinson, T., & Jenkins, D. (2003). America's middle schools in the new century: Status and progress. Westerville, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McMillian, J. H. (2000). High-stakes testing. CEPI Policy Issues: Standards, Assessment, Accountability. Richmond, VA: Commonwealth Educational Policy Institute. Retrieved January 21, 2006, from http://www.cepionline.org/policy_issues/saa/high_stakes.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrens, W. A., & Kaminski, J. (1989). Methods for improving standardized test scores: Fruitful, fruitless or fraudulent? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8(1), 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Millman, J., & Schalock, H. D. (1997). Beginning and introduction. In J. Millman (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools (pp. 3–8).Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
   Google Scholar
• Miyasaka, J. R. (2000). A framework for evaluating the validity of test preparation practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Service No. ED 454 256)
   Google Scholar
• Morocco, C. C., Brigham, N., & Aguilar, C. M. (2006). Visionary middle schools: Signature practices and the power of local invention. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, H. E., Morrison, J. D., & Bedford, S. (2007). Beyond numbers: making AYP one student at a time. Principal Leadership (Middle School Edition), 7(6), 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Monfils, L. F., Firestone, W. A., Hicks, J. E., Martinez, M. C., Schorr, R. Y., & Camilli, G. (2004). Teaching to the test. In W. A. Firestone & R. Y. Schorr (Eds.), The ambiguity of teaching to the test (pp. 37–62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). NAEP. The nation's report card. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved October 01, 2007, from http://www.nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (H.R.1), Title II. (2002). Available at http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (2008). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (2001). Teaching to the test. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 16–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. D. (1999). Teaching to the test. High School Magazine, 6(5), 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sadker, D., & Zittleman, K. (2004).Test anxiety: Are students failing test—or are tests failing students? Phi Delta Kappan, 85(10), 740–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, W. L. (1998, December). Value-added assessment. The School Administrator, 55(11),24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L., Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Rust, F., Snowden, J. B., Gordon, E., Gutierrez, & Pacheco, A. (2005). Assessment. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 275–326). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sindelar, N. W. (2006). Using test datafor student achievement. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Snowman, J., McCown, R., & Biehler, R. (2009). Psychology applied to teaching (12th ed.) Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Vars, G. F. (2001). Can curriculum integration survive in an era of high-stakes testing? MiddleSchoolJournal, 33(2), 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Volante, L. (2006). Toward appropriate preparation for standardized achievement testing. Journal of Educational Thought, 40(2), 129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Yost, D. S., & Vogel, R. (2007). Urban professional development working to create successful teachers and achieving students.MiddleSchoolJournal, 38(3), 34–40.
   Google Scholar