Cheating Themselves out of an Education: Assignments That Promote Higher-Order Thinking and Honesty in the Middle Grades

References

• Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M. (1997). Motivation and cheating during adolescence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED408557)
   Google Scholar
• Anderman E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2000). The role of social context in educational psychology: Substantive and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 67–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (2004). Changes in self-reported academic cheating across the transition from middle school to high school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 499–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., & Murdock, T. B. (2007). The psychology of academic cheating. In E. Anderman & T.B. Murdock (Eds.), Psychology of academic cheating (pp. 1–5). Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Cizek, G. J. (1999). Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect, and prevent it. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. L. (2004). Attributes and statuses of college students associated with classroom cheating on a small a small-sized campus.College Student Journal, 38, 116–129.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E. D., & Craig, D. (1990). Teacher and student perceptions of academic cheating in middle and senior high schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 84, 44–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and selfefficacy. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 115–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagacinski, C. M., & Nicholls, J. G. (1987). Conception of ability and related affects in task involvement and ego development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76., 909–919.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, M. (2008). The ethics of American youth: 2008 summary. Retrieved December 3, 2008, from http://charactercounts.org/programs/reportcard/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. (1999a). The costs of overemphasizing achievement. School Administrator, 56(10), 40–42
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. (1999b). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A's, praise, and other bribes. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. (1992) No contest: The case against competition. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Murdock, T. B., Miller, A., & Goetzinger, A. A. (2007). The effects of classroom context variables on university student's judgments of the acceptability of cheating: Mediating and moderating processes. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 141–169.
   Google Scholar
• Murdock, T. B., Miller, A., & Kohlhardt, J. (2004). Effects of classroom context variables on high school student's judgment of the acceptability and likelihood of cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 765–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathanson, C., Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2006). Predictors of a behavioral measure of scholastic cheating: Personality and competence but not demographics.Contemporary Education Psychology, 31, 97–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Middle School Association. (2010). This we believe: Keys to educating young adolescents. Westerville, OH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. & Wehlage, G. (1993). Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50(12), 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niels, G. J. (1996). Is the honor code a solution to the cheating epidemic? Unpublished manuscript. The Klingenstein Center, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Nonis, S., & Swift, C. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multi-campus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. (1995). From aptitude to effort: A new foundation for our schools. Daedalus, 17, 438–461.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schab, F. (1991). Schooling without learning: Thirty years of cheating in high school. Adolescence, 26(104), 839–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Starratt, R.J. (2005). Cultivating the moral character of learning and teaching: A neglected dimension of educational leadership. School Leadership and Management, 25, 399–411.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, J. M., & Gehlbach, H. (2007). Under pressure and underengaged: Motivational profile and academic cheating in high school. In E. Anderman & T. B. Murdock (Eds.), Psychology of academic cheating (pp. 107–141). Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (May 2008). Put understanding first. Educational Leadership, 65(8), 36–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar