References
- Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2012). Millennials will benefit and suffer due to their hyperconnected lives. Pew Research Center.
- Bintz, W., & Ciecierski, L. (2017). Hybrid text: An engaging genre to teach content area material across the curriculum. The Reading Teacher, 71(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1560
- Bintz, W. P., & Monobe, G. (2018). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Using poetry to integrate reading and writing across the curriculum. Middle School Journal, 49(3), 36–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2018.1439667
- Bishop, P. A., & Harrison, L. M. (2021). The successful middle school: This we believe. Association for Middle Level Education.
- Byrne Bull, K. (2011). Connecting with texts: Teacher candidates reading young adult literature. Theory Into Practice, 50(3), 223–230.
- Charmaz, K. (2010). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
- Clark, J. (2013). “Your credibility could be shot”: Preservice teachers’ thinking about nonfiction graphic novels, curriculum decision making, and professional acceptance. The Social Studies, 104(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2012.665957
- D’Adamo, L., & Fallace, T. (2011). An approach to developing historical empathy. Social Studies Research and Practice, 6(1), 75–88. http://www.socstrpr.org/files/Vol%206/Issue%201%20-%20Spring,%202011/Action%20Research/6.1.6.pdf
- Dalton, B., & Proctor, C. P. (2008). The changing landscape of text and comprehension in the age of new literacies. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 297–324). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Dassa, L., & Nichols, B. (2019). Self-efficacy or overconfidence? Comparing preservice teacher self-perceptions of their content knowledge and teaching abilities to the perceptions of their supervisors. The New Educator, 15(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2019.1578447
- De Groot, J. (2007). Preservice teachers and children’s literature: Implications for teacher-librarians. Teacher Librarian, 35(2), 18–22. https://www.proquest.com/magazines/preservice-teachers-childrens-literature/docview/224888664/se-2?accountid=12365
- Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Content area vocabulary learning. The Reading Teacher, 67(8), 594–599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1258
- Giorgis, C. (2011). The changing art of storytelling. Book Links, 20(4), 4–7. https://www.proquest.com/magazines/changing-art-storytelling/docview/872367366/se-2?accountid=12365
- Godfrey, K. (2014). New genres and reading comprehension: Bridging the gap between digital and academic literacies. California English, 19(3), 11–12. https://www.cateweb.org/journals/ce-february-2014/
- Kyriacou, C., & Kunc, R. (2007). Beginning teachers’ expectations of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1246–1257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.002
- Lehner-Quam, A., West, R. K., & Espinosa, C. M. (2017). Developing and teaching with a diverse children’s literature collection at an urban public college: What teacher education students know and ways their knowledge can grow about diverse books. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 36(4), 171–208
- Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2015). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.85
- Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2017). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Education, 197(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741719700202
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
- Martinez, M. G., & Harmon, J. M. (2011). An investigation of student preferences of text formats. The Alan Review, 39(1), 12–20. https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/ALAN/v39n1/martinez.html
- National Council for the Social Studies. (n.d.). Notable social studies trade books for young people. https://www.socialstudies.org/notable-social-studies-trade-books
- National Council of Teachers of English. (2018). A call to action: what we know about adolescent literacy instruction.
- National Science Teachers Association. (2019). Outstanding science trade books for students K–12. https://www.nsta.org/outstanding-science-trade-books-students-k-12
- Neuman, S. B., Kaefer, T., & Pinkham, A. (2014). Building background knowledge. Reading Teacher, 68(2), 145–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1314
- Pace, C. L., (2015). Re-imagining professional development: A study of teacher educators’ integration of a web seminar series as a component of university-based teacher education [Doctoral dissertation]. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/mse_diss/13/
- Prensky, M. R. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Corwin Press.
- Rhodes, J. A., & Robnolt, V. J. (2009). Digital literacies in the classroom. In L. Christenbury, R. Bromer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 153–169). The Guilford Press.
- Rosenblatt, L. M. (2004). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1363–1398). International Reading Association.
- Sanchez, R. M. (2010). The six remaining facts: Social studies content knowledge and elementary preservice teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 32(3), 66–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2010.10463560
- Serafini, F. (2012). Reading multimodal texts in the 21st century. Research in the Schools, 19(1), 26–32.
- Smith, M. L., Strahan, D., Patterson, B., Bouton, B., & McGaughey, N. (2018). Developmental aspects of young adolescents. In S. B. Mertens & M. M. Caskey (Eds.), Literature reviews in support of the middle level education research agenda (pp. 3–23). Information Age.
- Spires, H. A., & Kerkhoff, S. N. (2016). New literacies. In S. B. Mertens, M. M. Caskey, & N. Flowers (Eds.), The encyclopedia of middle grades education (2nd ed., pp. 282–286). Information Age.
- Springer, M. A. (2013). Charting the course of curriculum integration. In P. G. Andrews (Ed.), Research to guide practice in middle grades education (pp. 187–215). Association for Middle Level Education.
- Street, B. (2003). What’s ‘new’ in new literacy studies: Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91. https://www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/pdf/25734_5_2_street.pdf
- Wadham, R. L. (2013). The innovative world of young adult literature. Utah Journal of Literacy, 16(1), 17–22. https://utahliteracy.org/uploads/journal/spring-2013/04-the-innovative-world-of-young-adult-literature.pdf
- Wiles, D. (2010). Countdown. Scholastic.