The Most-Valuable-Player Problem Remains Unsolved

References

• Stephen . 2008 . “Solving the MVP Problem,” . Journal of Social Philosophy , 39 : 141 – 159 . Kershnar, See; Stephen Kershnar and Neil Feit, “The Most Valuable Player,” The Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 28 (2001): 196–210; Stephen Kershnar, “A True MVP,” in Michael Austin, ed., Football and Philosophy: Going Deep (University of Kentucky Press, 2008 141–153
   Google Scholar
• See Kershnar and Feit . 193 – 206 . “The Most Valuable Player,”
   Google Scholar
• 2002 . This definition comes f rom Steven Landsburg, Price Theory and Applications, , 5th ed. 120 Cincinnati : South-Western . pp.
   Google Scholar
• Woolner , Keith . 2010 . “Introduction to VORP: Value Over Replacement Player,” In baseball, one firm that provides a statistical analysis of baseball analyzes a player's value in term of his Value Over Replacement Player (VORP). “VORP” is defined as “the number of runs contributed beyond what a replacement level player would contribute if given the same percentage of team plate appearances.” It defines a “replacement level player” as “one who hits far below the league positional average as the league backups do relative to league average, who plays average defense for the position, and is a breakeven base-stealer and baserunner.” See http://www.stathead.com/bbeng/woolner/vopdescnew.htm, July 29
   Google Scholar
• Steven . 2002 . Price Theory and Applications., , 5th ed. 37 Cincinnati : Southwestern . Landsburg, See pp.
   Google Scholar
• 2010 . Vol. 27 , Massey, See Case, and Thaler, Richard. “The Loser's Curse: Overconfidence vs. Market Efficiency in the National Football League Draft,” http://mba.yale.edu/fac- ulty/pdf/massey_thaler_overconfidence_nfl_draft.pdf, July 25. The study found that teams choosing first in the draft get the least valuable player because their player on average provides the least value per dollar
   Google Scholar
• Massey and Thaler . “The Loser's Curse: Overconfidence vs. Market Efficiency in the National Football League Draft,” 1 7
   Google Scholar
• The vagueness here might be metaphysical . epistemic, or semantic. Vagueness is metaphysical when there is no clear answer as to whether an object exemplifies a property because the property does not have clear boundaries. Vagueness is epistemic when we do not or cannot know whether an object exemplifies a property. Vagueness is semantic when some feature of our language prevents there from being an answer as to whether an object exemplifies a property
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg , Joel , ed. Moral Concepts (New York : Oxford University Press . This claim about a role is controversial. On different accounts, a role is a natural property, social convention, or outcome of a contract. The natural property account can be seen in Bernard Williams, “The Idea of Equality,” in, 1969), 153–171;the social-convention account in Michael Walzer, Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books, 1983), 88 n, Tom Beauchamp and James Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics 4th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), 463; the contract account in Richard Epstein, Forbidden Grounds: The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws (Cambridge: Harvard, 1992 I will assert, but not defend here, the claims that the social- convention and contract theories of roles do not eliminate the vagueness and that the natural property theory is implausible
   Google Scholar
• Moore , G. E. 1922 . Philosophical Studies 260 – 261 . London : Routledge and Kegan Paul . (,;Fred Feldman, Utilitarianism, Hedonism, and Desert (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 139–140; Fred Feldman, “Basic Intrinsic Value.” Philosophical Studies, 99, 2000, 331
   Google Scholar
• The idea for this objection is in part due to Bradley Jay Strawser .
   Google Scholar
• I am grateful to Andrew Cullison, Neil Feit, George Schedler, and Bradley Jay Strawser for their extremely helpful comments and criticisms of this paper .
   Google Scholar