A powerful test for two-sided multiple independent characteristics supplier selection problem

References

• Kane VE. Process capability indices. J Qual Technol. 1986;18:41–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan LK, Cheng SW, Spiring FA. A new measure of process capability: Cpm. J Qual Technol. 1988;20:162–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Kotz S, Johnson NL. Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. J Qual Technol. 1992;24:216–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Chen KS. Multi-process performance analysis: a case study. Qual Eng. 1997;10:1–8. doi: 10.1080/08982119708919102
   Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Shu MH. Manufacturing capability control for multiple power distribution switch processes based on modified Cpk MPPAC. Microelectron Reliab. 2003;43:963–975. doi: 10.1016/S0026-2714(03)00096-9
   Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Shu MH. Lower confidence bounds with sample size information for Cpm with application to production yield assurance. Int J Prod Res. 2003;41:3581–3599. doi: 10.1080/0020754031000138349
   Google Scholar
• Bothe DR. A capability study for an entire product. ASQC Qual Congr Trans Nashville. 1997;46:172–178.
   Google Scholar
• Wu CW, Pearn WL. Measuring manufacturing capability for couplers and wavelength division multiplexers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2005;25:533–541. doi: 10.1007/s00170-003-1793-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng ST, Wu TY. Selecting the best manufacturing process. J Qual Technol. 1991;23:53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou YM. Selecting a better supplier by testing process capability indices. Qual Eng. 1994;6:427–438. doi: 10.1080/08982119408918738
   Google Scholar
• Huang DY, Lee RF. Selecting the largest capability index from several quality control processes. J Stat Plan Infer. 1995;46:335–346. doi: 10.1016/0378-3758(94)00114-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Wu CW, Lin HC. A procedure for supplier selection based on Cpm applied to STN-LCD processes. Int J Prod Res. 2004;42:2719–2734. doi: 10.1080/0020754042000203876
   Google Scholar
• Daniels L, Edgar B, Burdick RK, Hubele NF. Using confidence intervals to compare process capability indices. Qual Eng. 2005;17:23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Polansky AM. Permutation methods for comparing process capabilities. J Qual Technol. 2006;38:254–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Hung HN, Cheng YC. Supplier selection for one-sided processes with unequal sample sizes. Eur J Oper Res. 2009;195:381–393. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Wu CH. Supplier selection for multiple characteristics processes with one-sided specifications. Qual Technol Quant Manag. 2013;10:133–140.
   Google Scholar
• Bothe DR. A capability index for multiple process streams. Qual Eng. 1999;11:613–618. doi: 10.1080/08982119908919281
   Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Chang CS. An implementation of the precision index for contaminated processes. Qual Eng. 1998;11: 101–110. doi: 10.1080/08982119808919216
   Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Wu CW. Variables sampling plans with PPM fraction of defectives and process loss consideration. J Oper Res Soc. 2006;57:450–459. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Wu CW. Critical acceptance values and sample sizes of a new variables sampling plan for very low fraction of defectives. Omega-Int J Manage Sci. 2006;34:90–101. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CW, Pearn WL. A variable sampling plan based on Cpmk for product acceptance determination with low PPM defectives. Eur J Oper Res. 2008;184:549–556. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.032
   Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Hsu YC. Optimal tool replacement for processes with low fraction defective. Eur J Oper Res. 2007;180:1116–1129. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Hsu YC, Wu CW. Tool replacement for production with low fraction defective. Int J Prod Res. 2006;44:2313–2326. doi: 10.1080/00207540500446345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Hsu YC, Shiau JJH. Tool replacement policy for one-sided processes with low fraction defective. J Oper Res Soc. 2007;58:1075–1083. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Kotz S. Encyclopedia and handbook of process capability indices. Singapore: World Scientific; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Shiau JJH, Tai YT, Li MY. Capability assessment for processes with multiple characteristics: a generalization of the popular index Cpk. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2011;27:1119–1129. doi: 10.1002/qre.1200
   Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Wu CH. Supplier selection for processes with multiple characteristics based on testing capability index Cpk. J Test Eval. 2013;41:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Wu CH. Implementation of evaluating process capability index Cpk for processes with multiple characteristics. J Test Eval. 2012;40:643–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar