Comparing confidence intervals for Goodman and Kruskal's gamma coefficient

References

• Goodman LA, Kruskal WH. Measures of association for cross classifications. J Amer Statist Assoc. 1954;49: 732–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aadahl M, Zacho M, Linneberg A, Thuesen BH, Jørgensen T. Comparison of the Danish step test and the watt-max test for estimation of maximal oxygen uptake: the Health2008 study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;20: 1088–1094. doi: 10.1177/2047487312462825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövgren A, Hellström K. Reliability and validity of measurement and associations between disability and behavioural factors in patients with Colles’ fracture. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012;28:188–197. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2011.583174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hart SL, Behrens KY. Regulation of jealousy protest in the context of reunion following differential treatment. Infancy. 2013;18:1076–1110. doi: 10.1111/infa.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter LP, Kleykamp BA, Griffiths RR, Mintzer MZ. Cognitive effects of intramuscular ketamine and oral triazolam in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology. 2013;226:53–63. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2883-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleykamp BA, Griffiths RR, McCann UD, Smith MT, Mintzer MZ. Acute effects of zolpidem extended-release on cognitive performance and sleep in healthy males after repeated nightly use. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012;20: 28–39. doi: 10.1037/a0025237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuaire F, Izaute M, Bacon E. Evidence of some strategic preservation of episodic learning in patients with schizophrenia. Psychol Res. 2012;195:27–31. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.07.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcik DZ, Moulin CJA, Souchay C. Metamemory in children with autism: exploring ‘feeling-of-knowing’ in episodic and semantic memory. Neuropsychology. 2013;27:19–27. doi: 10.1037/a0030526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waylen KA, Fischer A, McGowan PJK, Thirgood SJ, Milner-Gulland EJ. Effect of local cultural context on the success of community-based conservation interventions. Conserv Biol. 2010;24:1119–1129. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01446.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall MG. A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika. 1938;30:81–93. doi: 10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall MG. The treatment of ties in ranking problems. Biometrika. 1945;33:239–251. doi: 10.1093/biomet/33.3.239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A. The estimation and comparison of strengths of association in contingency tables. Biometrika. 1953;40:105–110. doi: 10.2307/2333101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers RH. A new asymmetric measure of association for ordinal variables. Am Sociol Rev. 1962;27:799–811. doi: 10.2307/2090408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson TP. Measures of association for bivariate ordinal hypotheses. In: Blalock HM, editor. Measurement in the social sciences. Chicago: Aldine; 1974. p. 327–342.
   Google Scholar
• Woods CM. Consistent small-sample variances for six gamma-family measures of ordinal association. Multivar Behav Res. 2009;44:525–551. doi: 10.1080/00273170903103357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliff N. Ordinal methods for behavioral data. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Cliff N, Charlin V. Variances and covariances of Kendall's tau and their estimation. Multivar Behav Res. 1991;26:693–707. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2604_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods CM. Confidence intervals for gamma-family measures of ordinal association. Psychol Methods. 2007;12:185–204. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang JB. Score and profile likelihood confidence intervals for contingency table parameters. Stat Med. 2008;27:5975–5990. doi: 10.1002/sim.3391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman LA, Kruskal WH. Measures of association for cross classifications III. J Amer Statist Assoc. 1963;58:310–364. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsma WP, Rudas T. Marginal models for categorical data. Ann Statist. 2002;30:140–159. doi: 10.1214/aos/1015362188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsma WP, Croon MA, Hagenaars JA. Marginal models: for dependent, clustered, and longitudinal categorial data. New York: Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Agresti A. Good confidence intervals for categorical data [cited 13 Nov 22]. Available from: http://csm.lshtm.ac.uk/files/2011/02/Alan-Agresti-22-07-2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aitchison J, Silvey D. Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters subject to restraints. Ann Math Stat. 1958;29:813–828. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177706538
   Google Scholar
• Bergsma WP. Marginal models for categorical data. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press; 1997. Available from: http://stats.lse.ac.uk/bergsma/pdf/bergsma_phdthesis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kritzer HM. Analyzing measures of association derived from contingency tables. Sociol Method Res. 1977;5:35–50. doi: 10.1177/004912417700500401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijpers RE, Van der Ark LA, Croon MA. Testing hypotheses involving Cronbach's alpha using marginal models. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2013;66:503–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijpers RE, Van der Ark LA, Croon MA. Standard errors and confidence intervals for scalability coefficients in Mokken scale analysis using marginal models (with discussion). Sociol Methodol. 2013;43:42–69. doi: 10.1177/0081175013481958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agresti A, Coull BA. Approximate is better than ‘exact’ for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Amer Statist. 1998;52:119–126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/stats/html/00Index.html
   Google Scholar
• Bergsma WP, Van der Ark LA. cmm: categorical marginal models (version 0.2) [computer software]. Available from: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cmm/
   Google Scholar
• Woods CM. CCvariances.R.txt [computer code]. Available from author by request.
   Google Scholar
• Lang JB. mph.fit and ci.table [computer code]. Available from author by request.
   Google Scholar
• Agresti, A. Categorical data analysis. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Software documentation [cited 2013 Nov 22]. Available from: http://homepage.stat.uiowa.edu/~jblang/#software
   Google Scholar