Tuning-parameter selection in regularized estimations of large covariance matrices

References

• Johnstone I. On the distribution of the largest eigenvalue in principal components analysis. Ann Statist. 2001;29:295–327. doi: 10.1214/aos/1009210544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel P, Levina E. Covariance regularization by thresholding. Ann Statist. 2008;36:2577–2604. doi: 10.1214/08-AOS600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Karoui N. Operator norm consistent estimation of large-dimensional sparse covariance matrices. Ann Statist. 2008;36:2717–2756. doi: 10.1214/07-AOS559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman AJ, Levina E, Zhu J. Generalized thresholding of large covariance matrices. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2009;104:177–186. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2009.0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel PJ, Levina E. Regularized estimation of large covariance matrices. Ann Statist. 2008;36:199–227. doi: 10.1214/009053607000000758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Pourahmadi M. Banding sample autocovariance matrices of stationary processes. Statist Sinica. 2009;19:1755–1768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furrer R, Bengtsson T. Estimation of high-dimensional prior and posterior covariance matrices in Kalman filter variants. J Multivariate Anal. 2007;98:227–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2006.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai TT, Zhang C-H, Zhou HH. Optimal rates of convergence for covariance matrix estimation. Ann Statist. 2010;38:2118–2144. doi: 10.1214/09-AOS752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JZ, Liu N, Pourahmadi M, Liu L. Covariance matrix selection and estimation via penalised normal likelihood. Biometrika. 2006;93:85–98. doi: 10.1093/biomet/93.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam C, Fan J. Sparsistency and rates of convergence in large covariance matrix estimation. Ann Statist. 2007;37:4254–4278. doi: 10.1214/09-AOS720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman AJ, Levina E, Zhu J. A new approach to Cholesky-based covariance regularization in high dimensions. Biometrika. 2010;97:539–550. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asq022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan J, Fan Y, Lv J. High dimensional covariance matrix estimation using a factor model. J Econometrics. 2008;147:186–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan J, Liao Y, Micheva M. Large covariance estimation by thresholding principal orthogonal complements. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 2013;75:603–680. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12016
   Google Scholar
• Xiao L, Bunea F. On the theoretic and practical merits of the banding estimator for large covariance matrices. 2014. Available from: arXiv:1402.0844 [math.ST].
   Google Scholar
• Li D, Zou H. SURE information criteria for large covariance matrix estimation and their asymptotic properties. 2014. Available from: arXiv:1406.6514 [math.ST].
   Google Scholar
• Stone M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1974;36:111–147.
   Google Scholar
• Shao J. Linear model selection by cross-validation. J Amer Statist Assoc. 1993;88:486–494. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1993.10476299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Yu Y. Consistent cross-validation for tuning parameter selection in high-dimensional variable selection. 2013. Available from: arXiv:1308.5390 [stat.ME].
   Google Scholar
• Yi F, Zou H. SURE-tuned tapering estimation of large covariance matrices. Comput Statist Data Anal. 2013;58:339–351. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue L, Ma S, Zou H. Positive definite l1 penalized estimation of large covariance matrices. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2012;107:1480–1491. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2012.725386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron B. The estimation of prediction error: covariance penalties and cross-validation. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2004;99:619–632. doi: 10.1198/016214504000000692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman BW. Smoothed functional principal components analysis by choice of norm. Ann Statist. 1996;24:1–24. doi: 10.1214/aos/1033066196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao T. Topics in random matrix theory, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 132. Providence (RI): American Mathematical Society; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cai TT, Zhou HH. Minimax estimation of large covariance matrices under l1 norm (with discussion). Statist Sinica. 2012;22:1319–1378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. IJCAI'95 Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2, 1995 August 20–25; Montréal, Québec, Canada. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 1995. p. 1137–1143.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Klijn JG, Zhang Y, Sieuwerts AM, Look MP, Yang F, Talantov D, Timmermans M, Meijer-van Gelder ME, Yu J, Jatkoe T, Berns EM, Atkins D, Foekens JA. Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet. 2005;365:671–679. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17947-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minn AJ, Gupta GP, Padua D, Bos P, Nguyen DX, Nuyten D, Kreike B, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Ishwaran H, Foekens JA, van de Vijver M, Massague J. Lung metastasis genes couple breast tumor size and metastatic spread. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104:6740–6745. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701138104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar