A clustering-based coordinate exchange algorithm for generating G-optimal experimental designs

References

• Kiefer J. Optimum experimental designs. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 1959;272–319.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer J, Wolfowitz J. Optimum designs in regression problems. Ann. Math. Stat. 1959;30:271–294. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177706252
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer J. Optimum designs in regression problems, ii. Ann. Math. Stat. 1961;298–325. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177705160
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen N-K, Miller AJ. A review of some exchange algorithms for constructing discrete D-optimal designs. Comput. Stat. Data An. 1992;14(4):489–498. doi: 10.1016/0167-9473(92)90064-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorov V. Theory of optimal experiments, Preprint No. 7 LSM. Moscow: Izd-vo Moscow State University; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Fedorov V. Theory of optimal experiments. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell T, Miller F Jr. Use of design repair to construct designs for special linear models. Math. Div. Ann. Progr. Rept. (ORNL-4661). 1970;130–131.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn HP. The sequential generation of D-optimum experimental designs. Ann. Math. Stat. 1970;41(5):1655–1664. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177696809
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell T. An algorithm for the construction of D-optimal experimental designs. Technometrics. 1974;16(2):203–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook RD, Nachtrheim CJ. A comparison of algorithms for constructing exact D-optimal designs. Technometrics. 1980;22(3):315–324. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1980.10486162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson AC, Donev AN. The construction of exact D-optimum experimental designs with application to blocking response surface designs. Biometrika. 1989;76(3):515–526. doi: 10.1093/biomet/76.3.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer RK, Nachtsheim CJ. The coordinate-exchange algorithm for constructing exact optimal experimental designs. Technometrics. 1995;37(1):60–69. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1995.10485889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broudiscou A, Leardi R, Phan-Tan-Luu R. Genetic algorithm as a tool for selection of D-optimal design. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 1996;35(1):105–116. doi: 10.1016/S0169-7439(96)00028-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heredia-Langner A, Carlyle W, Montgomery D, Borror C, Runger G. Genetic algorithms for the construction of D-optimal designs. J. Qual. Technol. 2003;35(1):28–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines L. The application of the annealing algorithm to the construction of exact optimal designs for linear–regression models. Technometrics. 1987;29(4):439–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer R, Nachtsheim C. Simulated annealing in the construction of exact optimal design of experiments. Am. J. Math. Manag. Sci. 1988;8:329–359.
   Google Scholar
• Welch W. Branch-and-bound search for experimental designs based on d optimality and other criteria. Technometrics. 1982;24(1):41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelbasit KM, Plackett RL. Experimental design for binary data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1983;78(381):90–98. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1983.10477936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford I, Torsney B, Wu C. The use of a canonical form in the construction of locally optimal designs for non-linear problems. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 1992;569–583.
   Google Scholar
• Mathew T, Sinha BK. Optimal designs for binary data under logistic regression. J. Stat. Plan. Infer. 2001;93(1):295–307. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00173-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitter R, Torsney B. Optimal designs for binary response experiments with two design variables. Stat. Sinica. 1995;5:405–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dror HA, Steinberg DM. Robust experimental design for multivariate generalized linear models. Technometrics. 2006;48(4):520–529. doi: 10.1198/004017006000000318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods DC, Lewis SM, Eccleston JA, Russell KG. Designs for generalized linear models with several variables and model uncertainty. Technometrics. 2006;48(2):284–292. doi: 10.1198/004017005000000571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods DC. Robust designs for binary data: applications of simulated annealing. J. Stat. Comput. Sim. 2010;80(1):29–41. doi: 10.1080/00949650802445367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotwalt CM, Jones BA, Steinberg DM. Fast computation of designs robust to parameter uncertainty for nonlinear settings. Technometrics. 2009;51(1):88–95. doi: 10.1198/TECH.2009.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwood CL. Optimal and efficient designs of experiments. Ann. Math. Stat. 1969;1570–1602. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177697374
   Google Scholar
• Pang-Ning T, Steinbach M, Kumar V. Introduction to data mining. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh P, Nelder J. Generalized linear models, Vol. 37. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Myers R, Montgomery D, Vining G, Robinson T. Generalized linear models: with applications in engineering and the sciences, Vol. 791. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Pukelsheim F. Optimal design of experiments, Vol. 50. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial Mathematics; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Zahran A, Anderson-Cook CM, Myers RH. Fraction of design space to assess prediction capability of response surface designs. J. Qual. Technol. 2003;35(4):377–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruthi BN, Joseph VR. Improving the yield of printed circuit boards using design of experiments. Qual. Eng. 1999;12(2):259–265. doi: 10.1080/08982119908962583
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez M, Jones B, Borror CM, Montgomery DC. Generating and assessing exact G-optimal designs. J. Qual. Technol. 2010;42(1):3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkowski JJ. Using a genetic algorithm to generate small exact response surface designs. J. Prob. Stat. Sci. 2003;1(1):65–88.
   Google Scholar