Fitting asymmetric bimodal data with selected distributions

References

• Andrade BB, Bolfarine H, Siroky AN. Random number generation and estimation with the bimodal asymmetric power-normal distribution. J Stat Comput Simul. 2016;86:460–476. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2015.1016434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernagis DN, Hall AH, Datto MB. Genes with bimodal expression are robust diagnostic targets that define distinct subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer with different overall survival. J Mol Diagn. 2012;14(3):214–222. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason CC, Hanson RL, Ossowski V, Bian L, Baier LJ, Krakoff J, Bogardus C. Bimodal distribution of RNA expression levels in human skeletal muscle tissue. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:98. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Bedrick EJ, Hanson T, Restrepo C. A comparison of statistical tools for identifying modality in body mass distributions. J Data Sci. 2014;12(1):197–215.
   Google Scholar
• Devalia V, Hamilton MS, Molloy AM. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cobalamin and folate disorders. Br J Haematol. 2014;166:496–513. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly E, Zinger Y, Deletic A, Fletcher TD. A possible mechanism for soil moisture bimodality in humid-land environments. Geophys Res Lett. 2009;36(7):L07402. doi: 10.1029/2008GL036933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essington ME. Soil and water chemistry: an integrative approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Mapes BE, Soden BJ. Bimodality in tropical water vapour. QJR Meteorol Soc. 2009;129:2847–2866. doi: 10.1256/qj.02.166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolfarine H, Gómez HW, Rivas LI. The log-bimodal-skew-normal model. A geochemical application. J Chemometrics. 2011;25(6):329–332. doi: 10.1002/cem.1378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallavalle JM, Orr C, Blocker HG. Fitting bimodal particle size distribution curves. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1951;43(6):1377–1380. doi: 10.1021/ie50498a032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segala K, Dutra RL, Oliveira EN de, Rossi LM, Matos JR, Paula MMS, Franco CV. Characterization of poly-trans-[RuCl2(vpy)4 ]-styrene-4-vinylpyridine impregnated with silver nanoparticles in non aqueous medium. J Braz Chem Soc. 2006;17(8):1679–1682. doi: 10.1590/S0103-50532006000800028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurny KR. Aerosol chemical processes in the environment. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wesley IJ, Osborne BG, Anderssen RS, Delwiche SR, Graybosch RA. Chemometric localization approach to NIR measurement of apparent amylose content of ground wheat. Cereal Chem. 2003;80(4):462–467. doi: 10.1094/CCHEM.2003.80.4.462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzmann H, Vollmer S. A likelihood ratio test for bimodality in two-component mixtures – with application to regional income distribution in the EU. Adv Stat Anal. 2008;9:57–69. doi: 10.1007/s10182-008-0057-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartigan JA, Hartigan PM. The dip test of unimodality. Ann Statist. 1985;13:70–84. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176346577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman BW. Using kernel density estimates to investigate modality. J R Stat Soc B. 1981;43:97–99.
   Google Scholar
• Azzalini A. A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scand J Statist. 1985;12(2):171–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones MC. Families of distributions arising from distributions of order statistics. Test. 2004;13:1–43. doi: 10.1007/BF02602999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolfarine H, Martínez-Flórez G, Salinas HS. Bimodal symmetric-asymmetric power-normal families. Comm Statist Theory Methods. Forthcoming. doi:10.1080/03610926.2013.765475.
   Google Scholar
• Swamee PK, Rathie PN. Invertible alternatives to normal and lognormal distributions. J Hydrol Eng. 2007;12(2):218–221. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:2(218)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathie PN, Swamee PK. On a new invertible generalized logistic distribution approximation to normal distribution. Tech Report 07, Dep of Statistics, Univ of Brasilia, Brazil; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Rathie PN, Coutinho M. A new skew generalized logistic distribution and approximations to skew normal distribution. Aligarh J Statist. 2011;31:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold BC, Gómez HW, Salinas HS. A doubly skewed normal distribution. Statistics. 2015;49(4):842–858. doi: 10.1080/02331888.2014.918618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin M, Ley C. Skew-symmetric distributions and Fisher information – a tale of two densities. Bernoulli. 2012;18(3):747–763. doi: 10.3150/12-BEJ346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller DW, Sawitski G. Excess mass estimates and tests for modality. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2010;86:738–746.
   Google Scholar
• Maechler M. diptest: Hartigan's dip test statistic for unimodality – corrected. R package version 0.75-7; 2015. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=diptest
   Google Scholar
• Hall P, York M. On the calibration of Silverman's test for multi- modality. Statist Sinica. 2001;11:515–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Self SG, Liang K-Y. Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J Amer Statist Assoc. 1987;82:605–610. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro A. Caracterização genética e biométrica das populações de camarão rosa Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis de três localidades da costa do Rio Grande do Norte [Doctoral thesis]. (Ecology and Natural Resources, Federal Univ. of São Carlos, SP, Brazil); 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Devroye L. Non-uniform random variate generation. New York, NY: Springer; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Luke YL. The special functions and their approximations: v. 1. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Mathai AM, Saxena RK, Haubold HJ. The H-function: theory and applications. New York, NY: Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar