Repetitive group sampling plan based on the process capability index for the lot acceptance problem

References

• Jennett WJ, Welch BL. The control of proportion defective as judged by a single quality characteristic varying on a continuous scale. J Royal Statist Soc: Ser B. 1939;6:80–88.
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz H, Tang K. Bayesian variables acceptance sampling plans: quadratic loss function and step loss function. Technometrics. 1992;34:340–347. doi: 10.2307/1270040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh RP, Ramanathan TV. Acceptance sampling plans by variables for a class of symmetric distributions. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 1997;26(4):1379–1391. doi: 10.1080/03610919708813445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CW. Assessing process capability based on Bayesian approach with subsamples. Eur J Operat Res. 2006; 184:207–228. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam M, Azam M, Chi HJ. A mixed repetitive sampling plan based on process capability index. Appl Math Model. 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali S, Aslam M, Chi HJ. A new system of skip-lot sampling plans including resampling. Scientific World J. 2013:6. Article ID 192412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CW, Aslam M, Jun C-H. Variables sampling inspection scheme for resubmitted lots based on the process capability index Cpk. Eur J Oper Res. 2012;217:560–566. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Wu CW. Critical acceptance values and sample sizes of a variables sampling plan for very low fraction of defectives. Omega. 2006;34(1):90–101. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam M, Chi HJ, Azam M. Multiple dependent state sampling plan based on process capability index. J Test Eval. 2013;41(2):340–346. doi: 10.1520/JTE20120012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam M, Azam M, Chi HJ. Various repetitive sampling plans using process capability index of multiple quality characteristics. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind. 2015;31(6):823–835. doi: 10.1002/asmb.2110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortham AW, Baker RC. Multiple deferred state sampling inspection. Int J Prod Res. 1976;14:719–731. doi: 10.1080/00207547608956391
   Google Scholar
• Soundararajan V, Vijayaraghavan R. Construction and selection of multiple dependent (deferred) state sampling plan. J Appl Stat. 1990;17:397–409. doi: 10.1080/02664769000000012
   Google Scholar
• Vaerst R. A procedure to construct multiple deferred state sampling plan. Methods Oper Res. 1982;37:477–485.
   Google Scholar
• Govindaraju K, Ganesalingam S. Sampling inspection for resubmitted lots. Commun Stat Simul. 1997;26(3):1163–1176. doi: 10.1080/03610919708813433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam M, Wu CW, Azam M, Chi HJ. Variable sampling inspection for resubmitted lots based on process capability index Cpk for normally distributed items. Appl Math Model. 2013;37:667–675. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman RE. Design and evaluation of repetitive group sampling plans. Technometrics. 1965;7:11–21. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1965.10490222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali S, Park H, Jun CH, Kim KJ, Lee J. Designing of variables repetitive group sampling plan involving minimum average sample number. Commun Stat. 2005;34:799–809. doi: 10.1081/SAC-200068424
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali S, Subramani J. Designing of variables repetitive group sampling plan indexed by point of control. J Manuf Eng. 2010;5:166–169.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali S, Jun CH. Repetitive group sampling procedure for variables inspection. J Appl Stat. 2006;33:327–338. doi: 10.1080/02664760500446010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Kotz S, Johnson NL. Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. J Qual Technol. 1992;24(4):216–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SM, Hsu NF. The asymptotic distribution of the process capability index Cpmk. Commun Statist Theor Methods. 1995;24:1279–1291. doi: 10.1080/03610929508831553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Lin PC. Computer program for calculating the p-value in testing process capability index Cpmk. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2002;18:333–342. doi: 10.1002/qre.465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CW, Pearn WL. Avariables sampling plan based onCpmk for product acceptance determination. Eur J Operat Res. 2008;184:549–560. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali S, Jun CH. Multiple dependent state sampling plan for lot acceptance based on measurement data. Eur J Oper Res. 2007;180:1221–1230. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Wu CW. A Bayesian approach for assessing process precision based on multiple samples. Eur J Oper Res. 2005;165(3):685–695. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar