Monitoring parameter shift with Poisson integer-valued GARCH models

References

• Alzaid AA, Al-Osh M. An integer-valued pth-order autoregressive structure (INAR(p)) process. J Appl Probab. 1990;27(2):314–324. doi: 10.1017/S0021900200038766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin-Guan D, Yuan L. The integer-valued autoregressive (INAR(p)) model. J Time Ser Anal. 1991;12(2):129–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9892.1991.tb00073.x
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie E. Ch 16. discrete variate time series. In: Shanbhag DN, Rao CR, editors. Stochastic processes: modelling and simulation. Handbook of Statistics 21. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2003. p. 573–606.
   Google Scholar
• Weiß CH. Thinning operations for modeling time series of counts – a survey. AStA Adv Statist Anal. 2008;92(3):319–341. doi: 10.1007/s10182-008-0072-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiß CH. A Poisson INAR(1) model with serially dependent innovations. Metrika. 2015;78(7):829–851. doi: 10.1007/s00184-015-0529-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkman KF, Scotto MG, de Zea Bermudez P. Non-linear time series. Vol. 30. Basel: Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zeger SL, Qaqish B. Markov regression models for time series: a quasi-likelihood approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(4):1019–1031. doi: 10.2307/2531732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li WK. Time series models based on generalized linear models: some further results. Biometrics. 1994;50(2):506–511. doi: 10.2307/2533393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis RA, Dunsmuir WTM, Wang Y. On autocorrelation in a Poisson regression model. Biometrika. 2000;87(3):491–505. doi: 10.1093/biomet/87.3.491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrmeir L, Tutz G. Models for multicategorical responses: multivariate extensions of generalized linear models. New York (NY): Springer; 2001. p. 69–137.
   Google Scholar
• Jung RC, Kukuk M, Liesenfeld R. Time series of count data: modeling, estimation and diagnostics. Comput Statist Data Anal. 2006;51(4):2350–2364. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2006.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferland R, Latour A, Oraichi D. Integer-valued GARCH process. J Time Ser Anal. 2006;27(6):923–942. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00496.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fokianos K, Rahbek A, Tjøstheim D. Poisson autoregression. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2009;104(488):1430–1439. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doukhan P, Fokianos K, Tjøstheim D. On weak dependence conditions for Poisson autoregressions. Statist Probab Lett. 2012;82(5):942–948. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2012.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Liu H, Yao J-F, Davis RA, Li WK. Self-excited threshold Poisson autoregression. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2014;109(506):777–787. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2013.872994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poloniecki J, Valencia O, Littlejohns P. Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: observational study of heart surgery. BMJ. 1998;316(7146):1697–1700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7146.1697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger N. Hormone therapy and the rise and perhaps fall of us breast cancer incidence rates: critical reflections. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(3):627–637. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page ES. Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika. 1954;41(1/2):100–115. doi: 10.2307/2333009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Introduction to statistical quality control. 6th ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Brown RL, Durbin J, Evans JM. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1975;37(2):149–192.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Siegmund D. The likelihood ratio test for a change-point in simple linear regression. Biometrika. 1989;76(3):409–423. doi: 10.1093/biomet/76.3.409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai TL. Sequential changepoint detection in quality control and dynamical systems. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57(4):613–658.
   Google Scholar
• Knoth S, Schmid W. Control charts for time series: a review. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD; 2004. p. 210–236.
   Google Scholar
• Höhle M, Paul M. Count data regression charts for the monitoring of surveillance time series. Comput Statist Data Anal. 2008;52(9):4357–4368. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2008.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiß CH, Testik MC. CUSUM monitoring of first-order integer-valued autoregressive processes of Poisson counts. J Qual Technol. 2009;41(4):389–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Lee S. On first-order integer-valued autoregressive process with Katz family innovations. J Stat Comput Simul. 2016;87(3):546–562. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2016.1219356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiß CH, Testik MC. The Poisson INAR(1) CUSUM chart under overdispersion and estimation error. IIE Trans. 2011;43(11):805–818. doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2010.550910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiß CH, Testik MC. Detection of abrupt changes in count data time series: cumulative sum derivations for INARCH(1) models. J Qual Technol. 2012;44(3):249–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen A. Modelling time series count data: an autoregressive conditional Poisson model; 2003. Available at SSRN 1117187.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Wang D. Diagnostic checking integer-valued ARCH models using conditional residual autocorrelations. Comput Statist Data Anal. 2010;54(2):496–508. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung RC, Tremayne AR. Useful models for time series of counts or simply wrong ones? AStA Adv Statist Anal. 2011;95(1):59–91. doi: 10.1007/s10182-010-0139-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert D. Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics. 1992;34(1):1–14. doi: 10.2307/1269547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta PL, Gupta RC, Tripathi RC. Inflated modified power series distributions with applications. Comm Statist Theory Methods. 1995;24(9):2355–2374. doi: 10.1080/03610929508831621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu F. Zero-inflated Poisson and negative binomial integer-valued GARCH models. J Statist Plann Inference. 2012;142(4):826–839. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Lee Y, Chen CWS. Parameter change test for zero-inflated generalized Poisson autoregressive models. Statistics. 2015;50(3):540–557. doi: 10.1080/02331888.2015.1083020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gombay E, Serban D. Monitoring parameter change in AR(p) time series models. J Multivariate Anal. 2009;100(4):715–725. doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2008.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J, Lee S. Parameter change test for Poisson autoregressive models. Scand J Statist. 2014;41(4):1136–1152. doi: 10.1111/sjos.12088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustakides GV. Optimal stopping times for detecting changes in distributions. Ann Statist. 1986;14(4):1379–1387. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176350164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritov Y. Decision theoretic optimality of the CUSUM procedure. Ann Statist. 1990;18(3):1464–1469. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176347761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorden G. Procedures for reacting to a change in distribution. Ann Math Statist. 1971;42(6):1897–1908. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177693055
   Google Scholar
• Lai TL. Information bounds and quick detection of parameter changes in stochastic systems. IEEE Trans Inform Theory. 1998;44(7):2917–2929. doi: 10.1109/18.737522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen WA, Jones-Farmer LA, Champ CW, Woodall WH. Effects of parameter estimation on control chart properties: a literature review. J Qual Technol. 2006;38(4):349–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai T, Shan JZ. Efficient recursive algorithms for detection of abrupt changes in signals and control systems. IEEE Trans Automat Control. 1999;44(5):952–966. doi: 10.1109/9.763211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar