A density based empirical likelihood approach for testing bivariate normality

References

• Balakrishnan N, Lai C-D. Continuous bivariate distributions. New York (NY): Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins DM. A new test for multivariate normality and homoscedasticity. Technometrics. 1981;23(1):105–110. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1981.10486244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski CJ. The performance of some rough tests for bivariate normality before and after coordinate transformations to normality. Technometrics. 1970;12(3):517–544. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1970.10488694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecklin CJ, Mundfrom DJ. An appraisal and bibliography of tests for multivariate normality. Int Stat Rev. 2004;72:123–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2004.tb00228.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasicek O. A test for normality based on sample entropy. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1976;139:54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Vexler A, Hutson AD, Chen X. Statistical testing strategies in the health sciences. New York (NY): Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann EL, Romano JP. Testing statistical hypotheses. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar N, Mykland PA. An evaluation of the power and conditionality properties of empirical likelihood. Biometrika. 1998;85:523–534. doi: 10.1093/biomet/85.3.523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen AB. Empirical likelihood. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Vexler A, Gurevich G. Empirical likelihood ratios applied to goodness-of-fit tests based on sample entropy. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2010;54:531–545. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.09.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arizono I, Ohta H. A test for normality based on Kullback-Leibler information. Am Stat. 1989;43:20–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tusnady G. On asymptotically optimal tests. Ann Statist. 1977;5:385–393. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176343804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vexler A, Gurevich G, Hutson AD. An exact density-based empirical likelihood ratio test for paired data. J Stat Plan Inference. 2013;143(2):334–345. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2012.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izenman AJ. Resent developments in nonparametric density estimation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1991;86:205–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakasa Rao BLS. Nonparametric functional estimation. New York (NY): Accademic Press; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Carolan C, Dykstra R. Asymptotic behavior of the Grenander estimator at density flat regions. Can J Stat. 1999;27:557–566. doi: 10.2307/3316111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efromovich S. Nonparametric curve estimation: methods, theory, and applications. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Berrett TB, Samworth RJ, Yuan M. Efficient multivariate entropy estimation via k-nearest neighbour distances. arXiv. 2017: 1606.00304. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.00304
   Google Scholar
• Kozachenko LF, Leonenko NN. Sample estimate of the entropy of a random vector. Probl Inform Transm. 1987;23:95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu L-X, Wong HL, Fang K-T. A test for multivariate normality based on sample entropy and projection pursuit. J Stat Plan Inference. 1995;45:373–385. doi: 10.1016/0378-3758(94)00058-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BK, Van Ryzin J. A bivariate histogram density estimator: consistency and asymptotic normality. Stat Probab Lett. 1985;3:167–173. doi: 10.1016/0167-7152(85)90056-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin J. A histogram method of density estimation. Commun Stat. 1973;2(64):93–506.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012; Available from: http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Wilks SS. Mathematical statistics. New York (NY): John Wiley and Sons; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Looney SW. How to use tests for univariate normality to assess multivariate normality. Am Stat. 1995;49:64–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henze N, Zirkler B. A class of invariant consistent tests for multivariate normality. Commun Stat Theory Method. 1990;19:3595–3617. doi: 10.1080/03610929008830400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee R, Qian M, Shao YZ. On rotational robustness of Shapiro-Wilk type tests for multivariate normality. Open J Stat. 2014;4:964–969. doi: 10.4236/ojs.2014.411090
   Google Scholar
• Villaseñor-Alva JA, González-Estrada G. A generalization of Shapiro-Wilk’s test for multivariate normality. Commun Stat Theory Method. 2009;38:1870–1883. doi: 10.1080/03610920802474465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai W-M, Vexler A, Gurevich G. An extensive power evaluation of a novel two-sample density-based empirical likelihood ratio test for paired data with an application to a treatment study of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and severe mood dysregulation. J Appl Stat. 2013;40:1189–1208. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2013.784895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vexler A, Tsai W-M, Hutson AD. A simple density-based empirical likelihood ratio test for independence. Am Stat. 2014;68:158–169. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2014.901922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall P, Welsh AH. A test for normality based on the empirical characteristic function. Biometrika. 1983;70:485–489. doi: 10.1093/biomet/70.2.485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudholkar GS, Tian L. An entropy characterization of the inverse Gaussian distribution and related goodness-of-fit test. J Stat Plan Inference. 2002;102:211–221. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(01)00099-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudholkar GS, Tian L. A test for homogeneity of ordered means of inverse Gaussian populations. J Stat Plan Inference. 2004;118:37–49. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(02)00396-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vexler A, Kim YM, Yu J, et al. Computing critical values of exact tests by incorporating Monte Carlo simulations combined with statistical tables. Scand J Stat. 2014;41:1013–1030. doi: 10.1111/sjos.12079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson ME. Multivariate statistical simulation. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Schisterman EF, Faraggi D, Browne R, et al. TBARS and cardiovascular disease in a population-based sample. J Cardiovasc Risk. 2001;8:219–225. doi: 10.1097/00043798-200108000-00006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schisterman EF, Faraggi D, Browne R, et al. Minimal and best linear combination of oxidative stress and antioxidant biomarkers to discriminate cardiovascular disease. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2002;12:259–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limpert E, Stahel WA, Abbt M. Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues on the charms of statistics, and how mechanical models resembling gambling machines offer a link to a handy way to characterize log-normal distributions, which can provide deeper insight into variability and probability-normal or log-normal: that is the question. BioScience. 2001;51:341–352. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0341:LNDATS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar