Hypothesis testing for two population means: parametric or non-parametric test?

References

• Brunner E, Munzel U. The nonparametric Behrens–Fisher problem: asymptotic theory and a small-sample approximation. Biom J: J Math Methods Biosci. 2000;42(1):17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerland MW, Sandvik L. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30(5):490–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerland MW. t-Tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies a paradox of statistical practice? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrick B, Toher D, White P. Why Welchs test is type I error robust. Quant Methods Psych. 2016;12(1):30–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Wu C, Thompson ME. Mann–Whitney test with empirical likelihood methods for pretest–posttest studies. J Nonparametr Stat. 2016;28(2):360–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi AK, Mallawaarachchi I, Alvarado LA. Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method. Stat Med. 2017;36(14):2187–2205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudhir P, Wang YG, Ullah I. A review of the Behrens–Fisher problem and some of its analogs: Does the same size fit all? Revstat Stat J. 2018; to appear.
   Google Scholar
• Owen A. Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika. 1988;75(2):237–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen A. Empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions. Ann Stat. 1990;18(1):90–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen A. Empirical likelihood. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Efron B. Nonparametric standard errors and confidence intervals. Canad J Stat. 1981;9(2):139–158.
   Google Scholar
• DiCiccio T, Hall P, Romano J. Empirical likelihood is Bartlett-correctable. Ann Stat. 1991;19(2):1053–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Lawless J. Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations. Ann Stat. 1994;22(1):300–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanizaki H. Power comparison of empirical likelihood ratio tests: small sample properties through Monte Carlo studies. Kobe Univ Econom Rev. 2004;50:13.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson S. Small sample performance and calibration of the empirical likelihood method [dissertation]. Stanford university; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson SC, Owen AB, et al. Calibration of the empirical likelihood method for a vector mean. Electron J Stat. 2009;3:1161–1192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsagris M, Preston S, Wood ATA. Nonparametric hypothesis testing for equality of means on the simplex. J Stat Comput Simul. 2017;87(2):406–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsao M. A small sample calibration method for the empirical likelihood ratio. Stat Probab Lett. 2001;54(1):41–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsao M. A new method of calibration for the empirical loglikelihood ratio. Stat Probab Lett. 2004;68(3):305–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing B. Two-sample empirical likelihood method. Stat Probab Lett. 1995;24(4):315–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall P, La Scala B. Methodology and algorithms of empirical likelihood. Int Stat Rev. 1990;58(2):109–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral GJ. Bootstrap and empirical likelihood methods in statistical shape analysis [dissertation]. University of Nottingham; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Namba A. Simulation studies on bootstrap empirical likelihood tests. Commun Stat-Simul Comput. 2004;33(1):99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolucci F. A penalized version of the empirical likelihood ratio for the population mean. Stat Probab Lett. 2007;77(1):104–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral GJ, Wood AT. Empirical likelihood methods for two-dimensional shape analysis. Biometrika. 2010;97(3):757–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing B, Wood A. Exponential empirical likelihood is not Bartlett correctable. Ann Stat. 1996;24:365–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Zhou H, Chen J, et al. Adjusted exponentially tilted likelihood with applications to brain morphology. Biometrics. 2008;65(3):919–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schennach EM. Point estimation with exponentially tilted empirical likelihood. Ann Stat. 2007;35(2):634–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newey WK, Smith RJ. Higher order properties of GMM and generalized empirical likelihood estimators. Econometrica. 2004;72(1):219–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch BL. The generalization of ‘student's’ problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika. 1947;34(1/2):28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite FE. An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biom Bull. 1946;2(6):110–114.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull. 1945;1(6):80–83.
   Google Scholar
• Mann HB, Whitney DR. On two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat. 1947;18:50–60.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zou C, Zhang R. Empirical likelihood for the two-sample mean problem. Stat Probab Lett. 2008;78(5):548–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casella G, Berger RL. Statistical inference. Pacific Grove (CA): Duxbury; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• James G. Tests of linear hypotheses in univariate and multivariate analysis when the ratios of the population variances are unknown. Biometrika. 1954;41(1/2):19–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Wiel M, Di Bucchianico A, Van der Laan P. Symbolic computation and exact distributions of nonparametric test statistics. J R Stat Soc: Ser D (Stat). 1999;48(4):507–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadakis M, Tsagris M, Dimitriadis M, et al. Rfast: a collection of efficient and extremely fast R functions; 2018. R package version 1.9.2; Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Rfast.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelan SJ, Murillo FM, Boeke JD. The incredible shrinking world of DNA microarrays. Mol Biosyst. 2008;4(7):726–732.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Denoeud F, Aury JM, Da Silva C, et al. Annotating genomes with massive-scale RNA sequencing. Genome Biol. 2008;9(12):R175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakiotaki K, Vorniotakis N, Tsagris M, et al. Biodataome: a collection of uniformly preprocessed and automatically annotated datasets for data-driven biology. Database. 2018;2018:89.
   Google Scholar
• Chatzipantsiou C, Dimitriadis M, Papadakis M, et al. Extremely efficient permutation and bootstrap hypothesis tests using R. J Mod Appl Stat Methods (to appear). arXiv preprint arXiv:180610947; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Jing B, Robinson J. Two-sample nonparametric tilting method. Austral J Stat. 1997;39(1):25–34.
   Google Scholar