An efficient approach of designing distribution-free exponentially weighted moving average schemes with dynamic fast initial response for joint monitoring of location and scale

References

• Lucas JM, Saccucci MS. Exponentially weighted moving average control schemes: properties and enhancements. Technometrics. 1990;32:1–12. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1990.10484583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas JM, Crosier RB. Fast initial response for CUSUM quality-control schemes: give your CUSUM a head start. Technometrics. 1982;24(3):199–205. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1982.10487759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta-Mejia C, Pignatiello JJ. The run sum R Chart with fast initial response. Comm Statist Simulation Comput. 2010;39:921–932. doi: 10.1080/03610911003663899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazir HZ, Muhammad R, Does RJMM, et al. Robust CUSUM control charting. Qual Eng. 2013;25:211–224. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2013.769057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq A, Brown J, Moltchanova E. Improved fast initial response features for exponentially weighted moving average and cumulative sum control charts. Qual Reliab Engng Int. 2014;30:697–710. doi: 10.1002/qre.1521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajadi JO, Riaz M, Al-Ghamdi K. On increasing the sensitivity of mixed EWMA-CUSUM control charts for location parameter. J Appl Stat. 2015;43:1262–1278. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2015.1094453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu SL. Applying fast initial response features on GWMA control charts for monitoring autocorrelation data. Comm Statist Theory Methods. 2016;45:3344–3356. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2014.904348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi SA, Ahmad S, Riaz M. On enhanced sensitivity of nonparametric EWMA control charts for process monitoring. Sci Iran. 2017;24(1):424–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanusi RA, Riaz M, Abbas N, et al. Using FIR to improve CUSUM charts for monitoring process dispersion. Qual Reliab Engng Int. 2017;33:1045–1056. doi: 10.1002/qre.2090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Yu M, Zhuang F. Properties and enhancements of robust likelihood CUSUM control chart. Comput Ind Eng. 2017;114:80–100. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq A, Munir W. Improved CUSUM charts for monitoring process mean. J Stat Comput Simul. 2018;88:1684–1701. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2018.1444040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoth S. Fast initial response features for EWMA control charts. Statist Papers. 2005;46:47–64. doi: 10.1007/BF02762034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abid M, Nazir HZ, Riaz M, et al. An efficient nonparametric EWMA Wilcoxon signed-rank chart for monitoring location. Qual Reliab Engng Int. 2017;33:669–685. doi: 10.1002/qre.2048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abid M, Nazir HZ, Tahir M, et al. On designing a new cumulative sum Wilcoxon signed rank chart for monitoring process location. PloS One. 2018;13(4):1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir ST. Distribution-free quality control charts based on signed-rank-like statistics. Comm Statist Theory Methods. 2006;35:743–757. doi: 10.1080/03610920500498907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu P, Li Z. Distribution-free monitoring of univariate processes. Stat Probab Lett. 2011;81:1833–1840. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2011.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu P, Li Z. On nonparametric statistical process control of univariate processes. Technometrics. 2011;53:390–405. doi: 10.1198/TECH.2011.10005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Graham MA, Chakraborti S. Distribution-free exceedance CUSUM control charts for location. Comm Statist Simulation Comput. 2013;42:1153–1187. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2012.661638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborti S, Qiu P, Mukherjee A. Editorial to the special issue: nonparametric statistical process control charts. Qual Reliab Engng Int. 2015;31:1–2. doi: 10.1002/qre.1759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng R, Chakraborti S. A Phase II nonparametric adaptive exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Qual Eng. 2016;28:476–490. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2016.1183255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu P. Introduction to statistical process control. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zafar RF, Mahmood T, Abbas N, et al. A progressive approach to joint monitoring of process parameters. Comput Ind Eng. 2018;115:253–268. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed U, Riaz M, Mahmood T, et al. Simultaneous monitoring of linear profile parameters under progressive setup. Comput Ind Eng. 2018;125:434–450. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed U, Riaz M, Abbas N, et al. An assorted design for joint monitoring of process parameters: an efficient approach for fuel consumption. IEEE Access. 2019;7:104864–104875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Chakraborti S. A distribution-free control chart for the joint monitoring of location and scale. Qual Reliab Engng Int. 2012;28:335–352. doi: 10.1002/qre.1249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury S, Mukherjee A, Chakraborti S. A new distribution-free control chart for joint monitoring of unknown location and scale parameters of continuous distributions. Qual Reliab Engng Int. 2014;30:191–204. doi: 10.1002/qre.1488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepage Y. A combination of Wilcoxon's and Ansari-Bradley's statistics. Biometrika. 1971;58:213–217. doi: 10.1093/biomet/58.1.213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucconi O. Un nuovo test non parametrico per il confronto tra due gruppi campionari. Giornale degli Economisti. 1968;XXVII:225–248.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A. Distribution-free Phase-II exponentially weighted moving average schemes for joint monitoring of location and scale based on subgroup samples. Int J Adv Manuf Tech. 2017;92:101–116. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-9977-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A. Recent development in Phase-II monitoring of location and scale – an overview and some new results. Paper presented at: the 61st ISI World statistics congress; 2017; Marrakesh, Morocco.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood T, Nazir HZ, Abbas N, et al. Performance evaluation of joint monitoring control charts. Sci Iran. 2017;24(4):2152–2163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Xie M, Zhou M. Rank-based EWMA procedure for sequentially detecting changes of process location and variability. Qual Technol Quant M. 2018;15:354–373. doi: 10.1080/16843703.2016.1208941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong ZL, Mukherjee A, Khoo MBC. Some distribution-free Lepage-type schemes for simultaneous monitoring of one-sided shifts in location and scale. Comput Ind Eng. 2018;115:653–669. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.11.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Sen R. Optimal design of Shewhart-Lepage type schemes and its application in monitoring service quality. Eur J Oper Res. 2018;266:147–167. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Z, Mukherjee A, Liu YC, et al. Optimizing joint location-scale monitoring – an adaptive distribution-free approach with minimal loss of information. Eur J Oper Res. 2019;274:1019–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Z, Mukherjee A, Marozzi M, et al. A class of distribution-free exponentially weighted moving average schemes for joint monitoring of location and scale parameters. In: Koutras M, Triantafyllou I, editors. Distribution-free methods for statistical process monitoring and control. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 183–217.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu P. Some perspectives on nonparametric statistical process control. J Qual Technol. 2018;50:49–65. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2018.1404315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborti S, Graham MA. Nonparametric statistical process control. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Jones-Farmer LA, Woodall WH, Steiner SH, et al. An overview of Phase I analysis for process improvement and monitoring. J Qual Technol. 2014;46:265–280. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2014.11917969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capizzi G, Masarotto G. Phase I distribution-free analysis with the R package dfphase1. In: Knoth S, Schmid W, editors. Frontiers in statistical quality control. Vol. 12. Cham: Springer; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Marozzi M. Some notes on the location-scale Cucconi test. J Nonparametr Stat. 2009;21:629–647. doi: 10.1080/10485250902952435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marozzi M. Nonparametric simultaneous tests for location and scale testing: a comparison of several methods. Comm Statist Simulation Comput. 2013;42:1298–1317. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2012.665546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhäuser M. Nonparametric statistical tests. A computational approach. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoads TR, Montgomery DC, Mastrangelo CM. A fast initial response scheme for the exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Qual Eng. 1996;9:317–327. doi: 10.1080/08982119608919048
   Google Scholar
• Silverman BW. Density estimation. London: Chapman and Hall; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo F, Gomes MI. The skew-normal distribution in SPC. Revstat-Stat J. 2013;11:83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Abd-Elfattah AM, Pukait B. A rule of thumb for testing symmetry about an unknown median against a long right tail. J Stat Comput Simul. 2014;84:2138–2155. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2013.784316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CL, Mukherjee A, Su Q, et al. Some monitoring procedures related to asymmetry parameter of Azzalini's skew-normal model. Revstat-Stat J. 2016;17:1–24.
   Google Scholar