Leveraging random assignment to impute missing covariates in causal studies

References

• Rubin DB. For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis. Ann Appl Stat. 2008;2(3):808–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials. Stat Med. 2007;26:20–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangakis CE, Rubin DB. Addressing complications of intention-to-treat analysis in the combined presence of all-or-none treatment-noncompliance and subsequent missing outcomes. Biometrika. 1999;86(2):365–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Geng Z, Zhou XH. Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data (with discussion). Biometrics. 2009;65(3):675–682.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imai K. Statistical analysis of randomized experiments with non-ignorable missing binary outcomes: an application to a voting experiment. J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Statist). 2009;58(1):83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White IR, Thompson SG. Adjusting for partially missing baseline measurements in randomized trials. Stat Med. 2005;24:993–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schemper M, Smith TL. Efficient evaluation of treatment effects in the presence of missing covariate values. Stat Med. 1990;9:777–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J Am Stat Assoc. 1996;91(434):473–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Vach W. Logistic regression with missing values in the covariates. New York (NY): Springer; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Moons KG, Donders RA, Stijnen T, et al. Using the outcome for imputation of missing predictor values was preferred. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1092–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenwold RH, White IR, Donders AR, et al. Missing covariate data in clinical research: when and when not to use the missing-indicator method for analysis. Can Med Assoc J. 2012;184(11):1265–1269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolani S, Safarkhani M. The effect of partly missing covariates on statistical power in randomized controlled trials with discrete-time survival endpoints. Methodol Eur J Res Methods Behav Soc Sci. 2017;13(2):41–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayembe MT, Jolani S, Tan FES, et al. Imputation of missing covariate in randomized controlled trials with a continuous outcome: scoping review and new results. Pharm Stat. 2020;19(6):840–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan TR, White IR, Salter AB, et al. Should multiple imputation be the method of choice for handling missing data in randomized trials? Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27:2610–2626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteelandt SR, Goetghebeur E, Kenward M, et al. Ignorance and uncertainty regions as inferential tools in a sensitivity analysis. Stat Sin. 2006;16:953–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins JM. Non-response models for the analysis of non-monotone non-ignorable missing data. Stat Med. 1997;16(1):21–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foos F, Gilardi F. Does exposure to gender role models increase women's political ambition? A field experiment with politicians. J Exp Polit Sci. 2019;1–10. doi:10.1017/XPS.2019.21
   Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization. Ann Stat. 1978;6(1):34–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Inference and missing data (with discussion). Biometrika. 1976;63:581–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Pizer WA. The analysis of randomized experiments with missing data. Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper. 2000. p. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Ding P, Geng Z. Identifiability of subgroup causal effects in randomized experiments with nonignorable missing covariates. Stat Med. 2014;33(2):1121–1133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linero AR, Daniels MJ. Bayesian approaches for missing not at random outcome data: the role of identifying restrictions. Stat Sci. 2018;33:198–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels MJ, Hogan JW. Missing data in longitudinal studies: strategies for Bayesian modeling and sensitivity analysis. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sadinle M, Reiter JP. Itemwise conditionally independent nonresponse modeling for incomplete multivariate data. Biometrika. 2017;104(1):207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill RD, van der Laan MJ, Robins JM. Coarsening at random: characterizations, conjectures, counter-examples. In: Lin DY, Fleming TR, editors. Proceedings of the First Seattle Symposium in Biostatistics. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 123; New York, NY: Springer; 1997. p. 255–294. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-6316-3_14
   Google Scholar
• Rubin DB, Schenker N. Multiple imputation in health-care databases: an overview and some applications. Stat Med. 1991;10:585–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vach W, Blettner M. Biased estimates of the odds ratio in case-control studies due to the use of ad hoc methods of correcting for missing values for confounding variable. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134:895–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland S, Finkle WD. A critical look at methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic regression analyses. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:1255–1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard J, Meng XL. Application of multiple imputation in medical studies: from AIDS to NHANES. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:17–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338:b2393. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/338/bmj.b2393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little RJA. Regression with missing x's: A review. J Am Stat Assoc. 1992;87(420):1227–1237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu B, Ashmead R. Propensity score matching analysis for causal effects with MNAR covariates. Stat Sin. 2018;28(4):2005–2025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner M, Wong W. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1987;82(398):528–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polson NG, Scott JG, Windle J. Bayesian inference for logistic models using polya-gamma latent variables. J Am Stat Assoc. 2013;108:1339–1349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wang N, Robins JM. Large-sample theory for parametric multiple imputation procedures. Biometrika. 1998;85(4):935–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins JM, Wang N. Inference for imputation estimators. Biometrika. 2000;87:113–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter JP, Raghunathan TE. The multiple adaptations of multiple imputation. J Am Stat Assoc. 2007;102(480):1462–1471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie X, Meng XL. Dissecting multiple imputation from a multi-phase inference perspective: what happens when God's, imputer's and analyst's models are uncongenial?. Stat Sin. 2017;27:1485–1594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin DB, Stern H, Vehovar V. Handling “don't know” survey responses: the case of the Slovenian plebiscite. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995;90(431):822–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titterington DM, Mill GM. Kernel-based density estimates from incomplete data. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol). 1983;45(2):258–266.
   Google Scholar
• Little RJA. Pattern-mixture models for multivariate incomplete data. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;88:125–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadinle M, Reiter JP. Sequential identification of nonignorable missing data mechanisms. Stat Sin. 2018;28:1741–1759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar