A fast adaptive Lasso for the cox regression via safe screening rules

References

• Ng SK, Xiang L, Yau KWW. Mixture modelling for medical and health sciences. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Wang J, Zhou L. A survival ensemble of extreme learning machine. Appl Intel. 2018;48(7):1846–1858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol). 1972;34(2):187–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan J, Li R, et al. Variable selection for cox's proportional hazards model and frailty model. Ann Stat. 2002;30(1):74–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishwaran H, Kogalur UB, Gorodeski EZ, et al. High-dimensional variable selection for survival data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2010;105(489):205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MHR, Shaw JEH. Variable selection for survival data with a class of adaptive elastic net techniques. Stat Comput. 2016;26(3):725–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Li G. Extreme learning machine cox model for high-dimensional survival analysis. Stat Med. 2019;38(12):2139–2156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witten DM, Tibshirani R. Survival analysis with high-dimensional covariates. Stat Methods Med Res. 2010;19(1):29–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu M, Fan G. Variable selection by ensembles for the cox model. J Stat Comput Simul. 2011;81(12):1983–1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong HG, Li Y. Feature selection of ultrahigh-dimensional covariates with survival outcomes: a selective review. Appl Math A J Chinese Univ. 2017;32(4):379–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibshirani R. The lasso method for variable selection in the cox model. US Nat Library Med Nat Inst Health. 1997;16(4):385–95.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn I, Kim J, Jung SH, et al. Gradient lasso for cox proportional hazards model. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1775–1781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Sun T, Ying Z, et al. Oracle inequalities for the lasso in the cox model. Ann Stat. 2013;41(3):1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y. Elastic net for cox's proportional hazards model with a solution path algorithm. Stat Sin. 2012;22:27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou H, Hastie T. Regression shrinkage and selection via the elastic net, with applications to microarrays. JR Stat Soc Ser B. 2003;67:301–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang HH, Lu W. Adaptive lasso for cox's proportional hazards model. Biometrika. 2007;94(3):691–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou H. The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties. J Am Stat Assoc. 2006;101(476):1418–1429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan J, Lv J. Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2008;70(5):849–911.
   Google Scholar
• Li G, Peng H, Zhang J, et al. Robust rank correlation based screening. Ann Stat. 2012;40(3):1846–1877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Zhong W, Zhu L. Feature screening via distance correlation learning. J Am Stat Assoc. 2012;107(499):1129–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Leng C. High dimensional ordinary least squares projection for screening variables. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2016;78(3):589–611.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao SD, Li Y. Principled sure independence screening for cox models with ultra-high-dimensional covariates. J Multivar Anal. 2012;105(1):397–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong HG, Kang J, Li Y. Conditional screening for ultra-high dimensional covariates with survival outcomes. Lifetime Data Anal. 2018;24(1):45–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Chen X, Wang H. Robust feature screening for ultra-high dimensional right censored data via distance correlation. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2018;119:118–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ghaoui L, Viallon V, Rabbani T. Safe feature elimination in sparse supervised learning technical report no. UC/EECS-2010-126, EECS Dept., University of California at Berkeley; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang ZJ, Xu H, Ramadge PJ. Learning sparse representations of high dimensional data on large scale dictionaries. In: Advances in neural information processing systems; 2011. p. 900–908.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Xiang ZJ, Ramadge PJ. Lasso screening with a small regularization parameter. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. IEEE; 2013. p. 3342–3346.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Zhao Z, Wang J, et al. Safe screening with variational inequalities and its application to lasso. In International Conference on Machine Learning. 2014;abs/1307.7577:289–297.
   Google Scholar
• Fercoq O, Gramfort A, Salmon J. Mind the duality gap: safer rules for the lasso. In: International Conference on Machine Learning; Vol. abs/1505.03410; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ndiaye E, Fercoq O, Gramfort A, et al. Gap safe screening rules for sparse multi-task and multi-class models. In: Advances in neural information processing systems; 2015. p. 811–819.
   Google Scholar
• Ko J. Solving the cox proportional hazards model and its applications [Master's Thesis]. University of California, Berkeley; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd S, Vandenberghe L. Convex optimization. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell FE, Califf RM, Pryor DB, et al. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. Jama. 1982;247(18):2543–2546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Zhou L. Random survival forest with space extensions for censored data. Artif Intell Med. 2017;79:52–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerds TA, Schumacher M. Consistent estimation of the expected brier score in general survival models with right-censored event times. Biom J. 2006;48(6):1029–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Wang H, Xu Q. Survival forest with partial least squares for high dimensional censored data. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 2018;179:12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wang L, Wang J, et al. Transfer learning for survival analysis via efficient l2, 1-norm regularized cox regression. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE; 2016. p. 231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw. 2010;33(1):1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huangyue C, Lingchen K, Pan S, Shanshan P. Safe feature screening rules for the regularized Huber regression. Appl Math Comput. 2020;386:125500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(14):8418–8423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Houwelingen HC, Bruinsma T, Hart AA, et al. Cross-validated cox regression on microarray gene expression data. Stat Med. 2006;25(18):3201–3216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidaurre D, Bielza C, Larrañaga P. A survey of l1 regression. Int Stat Rev. 2013;81(3):361–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu W, Goldberg Y, Fine J. On the robustness of the adaptive lasso to model misspecification. Biometrika. 2012;99(3):717–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar