Phase II monitoring of logistic regression profiles with estimated parameters

References

• Kang L, Albin SL. On-line monitoring when the process yields a linear profile. J Qual Technol. 2000;32(4):418–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Mahmoud MA, Woodall WH. On the monitoring of linear profiles. J Qual Technol. 2003;35(3):317–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud MA, Woodall WH. Phase I analysis of linear profiles with calibration applications. Technometrics. 2004;46(4):380–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou C, Tsung F, Wang Z. Monitoring general linear profiles using multivariate exponentially weighted moving average schemes. Technometrics. 2007;49(4):395–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou C, Ning X, Tsung F. LASSO-based multivariate linear profile monitoring. Ann Oper Res. 2012;192(1):3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh A, Zerehsaz Y. Phase I control of simple linear profiles with individual observations. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2013;29(6):829–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motasemi A, Alaeddini A, Zou C. An area-based methodology for the monitoring of general linear profiles. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2017;33(1):159–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalafi S, Salmasnia A, Maleki MR. Remedial approaches to decrease the effect of measurement errors on simple linear profile monitoring. Int J Qual Res. 2020;14(4):1019–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki MR, Amiri A, Castagliola P. An overview on recent profile monitoring papers (2008–2018) based on conceptual classification scheme. Comput Ind Eng. 2018a;126:705–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh AB, Huwang L, Li YM. Profile monitoring for a binary response. IIE Trans. 2009;41(11):931–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadman A, Mahlooji H, Yeh AB, et al. A change point method for monitoring generalized linear profiles in phase I. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2015;31(8):1367–1381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi D, Wang Z, Zi X, et al. Phase II monitoring of generalized linear profiles using weighted likelihood ratio charts. Comput Ind Eng. 2016;94:178–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki MR, Amiri A, Taheriyoun AR. Phase II monitoring of binary profiles in the presence of within-profile autocorrelation based on markov model. Commun Stat-Simul Comput. 2017;46(10):7710–7732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotuhi H, Amiri A, Maleki MR. Phase i monitoring of social networks based on Poisson regression profiles. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2018;34(4):572–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki MR, Amiri A, Taheriyoun AR. Identifying the time of step change and drift in phase II monitoring of autocorrelated logistic regression profiles. Sci Iranica. Trans E, Ind Eng. 2018b;25(6):3654–3666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki MR, Amiri A, Taheriyoun AR, et al. Phase I monitoring and change point estimation of autocorrelated poisson regression profiles. Commun Stat-Theor Methods. 2018c;47(24):5885–5903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Shang Y, He Z. Phase I outlier detection in profiles with binary data based on penalized likelihood. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2019;35(1):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panza CA, Vargas JA. Monitoring weibull regression models with type I right-censored observations in phase II processes. Commun Stat-Simul Comput. 2020;49(2):335–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epprecht EK, Loureiro LD, Chakraborti S. Effect of the amount of phase I data on the phase II performance of S 2 and S control charts. J Qual Technol. 2015;47(2):139–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraz A, Woodall WH, Heuchenne C. Guaranteed conditional performance of the S2 control chart with estimated parameters. Int J Prod Res. 2015;53(14):4405–4413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh NA, Mahmoud MA, Keefe MJ, et al. The difficulty in designing Shewhart X and X control charts with estimated parameters. J Qual Technol. 2015;47(2):127–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagliola P, Maravelakis PE, Figueiredo FO. The EWMA median chart with estimated parameters. IIE Trans. 2016;48(1):66–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Chakraborti S. Phase II shewhart-type control charts for monitoring times between events and effects of parameter estimation. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2016;32(1):315–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorossana R, Fathizadan S, Nayebpour MR. EWMA control chart performance with estimated parameters under non-normality. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2016a;32(5):1637–1654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakitzis AC, Castagliola P. The effect of parameter estimation on the performance of one-sided Shewhart control charts for zero-inflated processes. Commun Stat-Theory Methods. 2016;45(14):4194–4214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You HW, Khoo MB, Castagliola P, et al. Optimal exponentially weighted moving average charts with estimated parameters based on median run length and expected median run length. Int J Prod Res. 2016;54(17):5073–5094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedhart R, da Silva MM, Schoonhoven M, et al. Shewhart control charts for dispersion adjusted for parameter estimation. IISE Transactions. 2017;49(8):838–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh NA, Mahmoud MA. Accounting for phase I sampling variability in the performance of the MEWMA control chart with estimated parameters. Commun Stat-Simul Comput. 2017;46(6):4333–4347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwetsloot IM, Woodall WH. A head-to-head comparative study of the conditional performance of control charts based on estimated parameters. Qual Eng. 2017;29(2):244–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Wang BX, Guo B, et al. Synthetic exponential control charts with unknown parameter. Commun Stat-Simul Comput. 2018;47(8):2360–2377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MH, Khoo MB. Double sampling np chart with estimated process parameter. Commun Stat-Simul Comput. 2019;50(8):2232–2250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar N. Conditional analysis of Phase II exponential chart for monitoring times to an event. Qual Technol Quant Manag. 2020;17(3):285–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psarakis S, Vyniou AK, Castagliola P. Some recent developments on the effects of parameter estimation on control charts. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2014;30(8):1113–1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud MA. The performance of phase II simple linear profile approaches when parameters are estimated. Commun Stat-Simul Comput. 2012;41(10):1816–1833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aly AA, Mahmoud MA, Woodall WH. A comparison of the performance of phase II simple linear profile control charts when parameters are estimated. Commun Stat-Simul Comput. 2015;44(6):1432–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorossana R, Aminmadani M, Saghaei A. Effect of phase I estimation error on the monitoring of simple linear profiles in phase II. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016b;84(5-8):873–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Birch JB, Woodall WH. Effect of phase I estimation on phase II control chart performance with profile data. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2016;32(1):79–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi Yazdi A, Zeinal Hamadani A, Amiri A. Addressing the effect of parameter estimation on phase II monitoring of multivariate multiple linear profiles via a new cluster-based approach. To Appear in Commun Stat-Theory Methods. 2019a;49(17):4117–4132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi Yazdi A, Zeinal Hamadani A, Amiri A. Phase II monitoring of multivariate profiles with estimated parameters and optimal phase I subgroups. To Appear in Commun Stat-Simul Comput. 2019b;50(10):2858–2884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi Yazdi A, Zeinal Hamadani A, Amiri A. Phase II monitoring of multivariate simple linear profiles with estimated parameters. J Ind Eng Int. 2019c;15:557–570.
   Google Scholar
• Maleki MR, Castagliola P, Amiri A, et al. The effect of parameter estimation on phase II monitoring of poisson regression profiles. Commun Stat-Simul Comput. 2019;48(7):1964–1978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imani MH, Amiri AH. Phase II monitoring of logistic regression profile in two-stage processes). In 11th International Industrial Engineering conference.; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Saghaei A, Rezazadeh-Saghaei M, Noorossana R, et al. Phase II logistic profile monitoring. Int J Ind Eng Prod Res. 2012;23(4):291–299.
   Google Scholar
• Izadbakhsh H, Noorossana R, Zarinbal M, et al. An EWMA-based method for monitoring polytomous logistic profiles. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering management. Singapore: IEEE; 2011, December. p. 1359–1363.
   Google Scholar
• Noorossana R, Aminnayeri M, Izadbakhsh H. Statistical monitoring of polytomous logistic profiles in phase II. Scientia Iranica. 2013;20(3):958–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villasenor Alva JA, Estrada EG. A generalization of shapiro–wilk's test for multivariate normality. Commun Stat—Theory Methods. 2009;38(11):1870–1883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG. Introduction to linear regression analysis (Vol. 821). New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Soleymanian ME, Khedmati M, Mahlooji H. Phase II monitoring of binary response profiles. Scientia Iranica. 2013;20(6):2238–2246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar