Bivariate copula-based CUSUM charts for monitoring conditional nonlinear processes with first-order autocorrelation

References

• Shewhart WA. Quality control charts. Bell Syst Tech J. 1926;5(4):593–603.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke PD. Detecting a shift in fraction nonconforming using run-length control charts with 100% inspection. J Qual Technol. 1991;23(3):225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan F. Monitoring Poisson observations using modified exponentially weighted moving average control charts. Commun Stat – Simul Comput. 1990;19(1):103–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Pan E, Xiao Y. On autoregressive model selection for the exponentially weighted moving average control chart of residuals in monitoring the mean of autocorrelated processes. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2020;36(7):2351–2369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garzavenegas J, Tercerogomez VG, Ho LL, et al. Effect of autocorrelation estimators on the performance of the X¯ control chart. J Stat Comput Simul. 2018;88(13):2612–2630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacella M, Semeraro Q. Using recurrent neural networks to detect changes in autocorrelated processes for quality monitoring. Comput Ind Eng. 2007;52(4):502–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alwan LC, Roberts HV. Time-series modeling for statistical process control. J Bus Econ Stat. 1988;6(1):87–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atienza OO, Tang L, Ang B. A CUSUM scheme for autocorrelated observations. J Qual Technol. 2002;34(2):187–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng Shiau JJ, Ya-Chen H. Robustness of the EWMA control chart to non-normality for autocorrelated processes. Qual Technol Quant Manag. 2005;2(2):125–146.
   Google Scholar
• Lu CW, Reynolds MRJ. CUSUM charts for monitoring an autocorrelated process. J Qual Technol. 2001;33(3):316–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emura T, Long TH, Sun LH. R routines for performing estimation and statistical process control under copula-based time series models. Commun Stat-Simul Comput. 2017;46(4):3067–3087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runger GC, Willemain TR. Model-based and model-free control of autocorrelated processes. J Qual Technol. 1995;27(4):283–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S. Location and scale-based CUSUM test with application to autoregressive models. J Stat Comput Simul. 2020;90(13):2309–2328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas S, Fried R. Robust control charts for the mean of a locally linear time series. J Stat Comput Simul. 2020;90(15):2741–2765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issam BK, Mohamed L. Support vector regression based residual MCUSUM control chart for autocorrelated process. Appl Math Comput. 2008;201(1):565–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang NF. A statistical control chart for stationary process data. Technometrics. 1998;40(1):24–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafarian-Namin S, Fallahnezhad MS, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, et al. An integrated quality, maintenance and production model based on the delayed monitoring under the ARMA control chart. J Stat Comput Simul. 2021;91(13):2645–2669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa A, Fichera S. Economic-statistical design of adaptive ARMA control chart for autocorrelated data. J Stat Comput Simul. 2021;91(3):623–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang FK, Cheng XB. Exponentially weighted moving average chart with a likelihood ratio test for monitoring autocorrelated processes. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2020;36(2):753–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei-Aning R, Abbasi SA, Riaz M. Mixed EWMA-CUSUM and mixed CUSUM-EWMA modified control charts for monitoring first order autoregressive processes. Qual Technol Quant Manag. 2017;14(4):429–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruschinrimini N, Bengal I, Maimon O. Fractal geometry statistical process control for non-linear pattern-based processes. IIE Trans. 2013;45(4):355–373.
   Google Scholar
• Psarakis S, Papaleonida GEA. SPC procedures for monitoring autocorrelated processes. Qual Technol Quant Manag. 2007 Jan;4(4):501–540.
   Google Scholar
• Lu CW, Reynolds MRJ. EWMA control charts for monitoring the mean of autocorrelated processes. J Qual Technol. 1999;31(2):166–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Cheng C, Zheng Z. Optimal design of an attribute control chart for monitoring the mean of autocorrelated processes. Comput Ind Eng. 2019;137:106081.
   Google Scholar
• Weiß C. On eigenvalues of the transition matrix of some count data Markov chains. Methodol Comput Appl Probab. 2017;19(3):997–1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venter GG. Tails of copulas. Proc Casualty Actuar Soci. 2002;89(171):68–113.
   Google Scholar
• Sklar M. Fonctions de repartition an dimensions et leurs marges. Publ Inst Statist Univ Paris. 1959;8:229–231.
   Google Scholar
• Nelsen RB. An introduction to copulas. New York (NY):Springer Science & Business Media; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Low RKY, Alcock J, Faff R, et al. Canonical vine copulas in the context of modern portfolio management : are they worth it?. J Bank Financ. 2013;37(8):3085–3099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valle LD, Giuli MED, Tarantola C, et al. Default probability estimation via pair copula constructions. Eur J Oper Res. 2016;249(1):298–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righi MB, Ceretta PS. Estimating non-linear serial and cross-interdependence between financial assets. J Bank Financ. 2013;37(3):837–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu M, Hua L, Xu S. A vine copula model for predicting the effectiveness of cyber defense early – warning. Technometrics. 2017;59(4):508–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen A, Rengifo E. Multivariate autoregressive modeling of time series count data using copulas. J Empir Finance. 2007;14(4):564–583.
   Google Scholar
• Dokouhaki P, Noorossana R. A copula Markov cusum chart for monitoring the bivariate auto-correlated binary observations. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2013;29(6):911–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdier G. Application of copulas to multivariate control charts. J Stat Plan Inference. 2013;143(12):2151–2159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuvattana S, Busababodhin P, Areepong Y, et al. Bivariate copulas on the exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol. 2016;38(5):569–574.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual FG, Akhundjanov SB. Copula-based control charts for monitoring multivariate Poisson processes with application to hepatitis C counts. J Qual Technol. 2020;52(2):128–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hryniewicz O. On the robustness of the Shewhart control chart to different types of dependencies in data. Frontiers in statistical quality control. Vol. 10, Springer; 2012. p. 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Genest C, Rivest LP. Statistical inference procedures for bivariate Archimedean copulas. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;88(423):1034–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durante F, Sempi C. Principles of copula theory. New York (NY):Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bouyé E, Gaussel N, Salmon M. Investigating dynamic dependence using copulae. Financial Econometrics Research Center; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Smith M, Min A, Almeida C, et al. Modeling longitudinal data using a pair-copula decomposition of serial dependence. J Am Stat Assoc. 2010;105(492):1467–1479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes BVM, Aíube C. Copula based models for serial dependence. Int J Manag Finance. 2011;7(1):68–82.
   Google Scholar
• Joe H. Time series models with univariate margins in the convolution-closed infinitely divisible class. J Appl Probab. 1996;33(3):664–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Wu WB, Yi Y. Efficient estimation of copula-based semiparametric Markov models. Ann Stat. 2009;37(6B):4214–4253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane GJ, Hoek J. Conditional expectation formulae for copulas. Aust N Z J Stat. 2008;50(1):53–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Fan Y. Estimation of copula-based semiparametric time series models. J Econom. 2006;130(2):307–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu JH, Wan HG, Kim S. Optimal design of a CUSUM chart for a mean shift of unknown size. J Qual Technol. 2010;42(3):311–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang W, Shu L, Jiang W. A gradient approach to the optimal design of cusum charts under unknown mean-shift sizes. J Qual Technol. 2016;48(1):68–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Introduction to statistical quality control. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Marsaglia G, Tsang WW, Wang J. Evaluating Kolmogorov's distribution. J Stat Softw. 2003;8(18):1–4.
   Google Scholar