Thin plate spline model under skew-normal random errors: estimation and diagnostic analysis for spatial data

References

• Wahba G. Spline models for observational data. Vol. 59. Philadelphia (PA): SIAM; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Scheuerer M, Schaback R, Schlather M. Interpolation of spatial data – a stochastic or a deterministic problem?. Eur J Appl Math. 2013;24(04):601–629.
   Google Scholar
• Cressie N. Statistics for spatial data. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Nychka DW. Spatial-process estimates as smoothers. In: Schimek MG, editor. Smoothing and regression: approaches, computation, and application Vol. 329. New York (NY): Wiley; 2000. p. 393.
   Google Scholar
• Wood SN. Thin plate regression splines. J R Stat Soc: Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2003;65(1):95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Mardia KV. 9 tests of unvariate and multivariate normality. Handb Stat. 1980;1:279–320.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Carlin BP, Gelfand AE. Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Azzalini A. A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scand J Stat. 1985;12(2):171–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. J R Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol). 1977;39(1):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Suesse T, Zammit-Mangion A. Computational aspects of the em algorithm for spatial econometric models with missing data. J Stat Comput Simul. 2017;87(9):1767–1786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan Y, Haran M. Fast expectation-maximization algorithms for spatial generalized linear mixed models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.05440; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Wu CFJ. On the convergence properties of the em algorithm. Ann Stat. 1983;11(1):95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couvreur C. The em algorithm: a guided tour. In: Kárný M, Warwick K, editors. Computer intensive methods in control and signal processing. Birkhäuser: Springer; 1997. p. 209–222.
   Google Scholar
• Kauermann G. A note on smoothing parameter selection for penalized spline smoothing. J Stat Plan Inference. 2005;127(1–2):53–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin X, Zhang D. Inference in generalized additive mixed modelsby using smoothing splines. J R Stat Soc: Ser B (Stat Methodol). 1999;61(2):381–400.
   Google Scholar
• Contreras-Reyes JE. Chaotic systems with asymmetric heavy-tailed noise: application to 3D attractors. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2021;145:Article ID 110820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green PJ, Silverman BW. Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models: a roughness penalty approach. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Moraga MS, Ibacache-Pulgar G, Nicolis O. On an elliptical thin-plate spline partially varying-coefficient model. Chil J Stat. 2021;12(2):205–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira CS, Paula GA. Estimation and diagnostic for skew-normal partially linear models. J Appl Stat. 2017;44(16):3033–3053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch CE, Searle SR. Generalized, linear, and mixed models. New York (NY): Wiley; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y. Mixed effects smoothing spline analysis of variance. J R Stat Soc: Ser B (Stat Methodol). 1998;60(1):159–174.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin BP. Bayes and empirical Bayes methods for data analysis. Technical report; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Skaug HJ, Fournier DA. Automatic approximation of the marginal likelihood in non-gaussian hierarchical models. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2006;51(2):699–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney L, Kadane JB. Accurate approximations for posterior moments and marginal densities. J Am Stat Assoc. 1986;81(393):82–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleistein N, Handelsman RA. Asymptotic expansions of integrals. New York (NY): Dover Publications, Inc.; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen K, Nielsen A, Berg CW, et al. TMB: automatic differentiation and Laplace approximation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.00660; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. Rstudio: integrated development for R. Boston (MA): RStudio; 2019. Available from: https://www.rstudio.com/products/rstudio
   Google Scholar
• Cook DR. Assessment of local influence. J R Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol). 1986;48(2):133–155.
   Google Scholar
• Poon W-Y, Poon YS. Conformal normal curvature and assessment of local influence. J R Stat Soc: Ser B (Stat Methodol). 1999;61(1):51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Ruppert D, Wand MP, Carroll RJ. Semiparametric regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.  Number 12.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi GD, Querales M, Contreras-Reyes JE, et al. Sampling procedure for establishing criterion for sea urchin (Loxechinus albus) proportion under the legal minimum length of landings. J Mar Sci Eng. 2020;8:102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavieres J, Monnahan CC, Vehtari A. Accounting for spatial dependence improves relative abundance estimates in a benthic marine species structured as a metapopulation. Fish Res. 2021;240:Article ID 105960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar