Multiply robust estimation of the average treatment effect with missing outcomes

References

• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Rubin DB. Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data. 3rd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR. Model-based direct adjustment. J Am Stat Assoc. 1987;82:387–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao J, Rohde C. Variance reduction in the inverse probability weighted estimators for the average treatment effect using the propensity score. Biometrics. 2021;78:660–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvitz DG, Thompson DJ. A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J Am Stat Assoc. 1952;47:663–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma X, Wang J. Robust inference using inverse probability weighting. J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115:1851–1860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westreich D, Edwards JK, Cole SR, et al. Imputation approaches for potential outcomes in causal inference. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:1731–1737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding P, Li F. Causal inference: a missing data perspective. Stat Sci. 2018;33:214–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Yu L, Liu L, Peace KE. Regression multiple imputation for missing data analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 2020;29:2647–2664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang H, Robins JM. Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics. 2005;61:962–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai K, Ratkovic M. Covariate balancing propensity score. J R Stat Soc B. 2014;76:243–263.
   Google Scholar
• Semenova V, Chernozhukov V. Debiased machine learning of conditional average treatment effects and other causal functions. Econom J. 2021;24:264–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukes O, Vansteelandt S. Inference for treatment effect parameters in potentially misspecified high-dimensional models. Biometrika. 2021;108:321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan Z. Bounded, efficient and doubly robust estimation with inverse weighting. Biometrika. 2010;97:661–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen K, Vansteelandt S. Bias-reduced doubly robust estimation. J Am Stat Assoc. 2015;110:1024–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao W, Liu L, Tchetgen ET, et al. Identification, doubly robust estimation, and semiparametric efficiency theory of nonignorable missing data with a shadow variable; 2019. arXiv:1509.02556v3.
   Google Scholar
• Han P, Wang L. Estimation with missing data: beyond double robustness. Biometrika. 2013;100:417–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KCG. A simple multiply robust estimator for missing response problem. Stat. 2013;2:143–149.
   Google Scholar
• Han P. Multiply robust estimation in regression analysis with missing data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2014;109:1159–1173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L. Multiple robustness estimation in causal inference. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2019;48:5701–5718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Han P, Wu C. Empirical likelihood inference for non-randomized pretest-posttest studies with missing data. Electron J Stat. 2019;13:2012–2042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Gu Y, Liu L. Demystifying a class of multiply robust estimators. Biometrika. 2020;107:919–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Wang L, Ding P. Causal inference with confounders missing not at random. Biometrika. 2019;106:875–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer I, Wager S, Gauss T, et al. Doubly robust treatment effect estimation with missing attributes. Ann Appl Stat. 2020;14:1409–1431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei K, Qin G, Zhang J, et al. Doubly robust estimation in causal inference with missing outcomes: with an application to the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2022;168:Article ID 107399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Sitter RR. A model-calibration approach to using complete auxiliary information from survey data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2001;96:185–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen AB. Empirical likelihood. New York (NY): Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn J. On the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects. Econometrica. 1998;66:315–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair SN, Kohl HW, Paffenbarger RS, et al. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA. 1989;3:2395–2401.
   Google Scholar