Flexible Bayesian quantile regression for nonlinear mixed effects models based on the generalized asymmetric Laplace distribution

References

• Lindstrom MJ, Bates DM. Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Biometrics. 1990;46(3):673–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidian M, Giltinan DM. Nonlinear models for repeated measurement data: an overview and update. J Agric Biol Environ Stat. 2003;8(4):387–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker R, Bassett G. Regression quantiles. Econometrica. 1978;46(1):33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker R. Quantile regression. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Koenker R. Quantile regression for longitudinal data. J Multivar Anal. 2004;91(1):74–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker R, Machado JAF. Goodness of fit and related inference processes for quantile regression. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94(448):1296–1310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotz S, Kozubowski TJ, Podgorski K. The Laplace distribution and generalizations: a revisit with applications to communications, economics, engineering, and finance. Boston: Birkhäuser; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Yu K, Moyeed RA. Bayesian quantile regression. Stat Probab Lett. 2001;54(4):437–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozumi H, Kobayashi G. Gibbs sampling methods for Bayesian quantile regression. J Stat Comput Simul. 2011;81(11):1565–1578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraci M, Bottai M. Quantile regression for longitudinal data using the asymmetric Laplace distribution. Biostatistics. 2007;8(1):140–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraci M, Bottai M. Linear quantile mixed models. Stat Comput. 2014;24(3):461–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Yin G. Bayesian quantile regression for longitudinal studies with nonignorable missing data. Biometrics. 2010;66(1):105–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Lian H, Tian M. Bayesian quantile regression for longitudinal data models. J Stat Comput Simul. 2012;82(11):1635–1649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J. Bayesian quantile regression for parametric nonlinear mixed effects models. Stat Methods Appl. 2012;21(3):279–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Chen J, Qiu H. Bayesian quantile regression for nonlinear mixed-effects joint models for longitudinal data in the presence of mismeasured covariate errors. J Biopharm Stat. 2017;27(5):741–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraci M. Modelling and estimation of nonlinear quantile regression with clustered data. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2019;136:30–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garlaza CE, Castro LM, Louzada F, et al. Quantile regression for nonlinear mixed effects models: a likelihood based perspective. Stat Pap. 2020;61(3):1281–1307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delyon B, Lavielle M, Moulines E. Convergence of a stochastic approximation version of the EM algorithm. Ann Stat. 1999;27(1):94–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan Y, Kottas A. A new family of error distributions for Bayesian quantile regression. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.05666v2, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman M, Karnawat S. Flexible Bayesian quantile regression in ordinal models. Adv Econom. 2019;40B:211–251.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi G, Roh T, Lee J, et al. Flexible Bayesian quantile curve fitting with shape restrictions under the Dirichlet process mixture of the generalized asymmetric Laplace distribution. Can J Stat. 2021;49(3):698–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherlock C, Fearnhead P, Roberts GO. The random walk metropolis: linking theory and practice through a case study. Stat Sci. 2010;25(2):172–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barndorff-Nielsen OE, Shephard N. Non-Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck-based models and some of their uses in financial economics. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2001;63(2):167–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts GO, Rosenthal JS. Examples of adaptive MCMC. J Comput Graph Stat. 2009;18(2):349–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geweke JF. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to calculating posterior moments. In: Bernardo JM, Berger JO, Dawid AP, Smith AFM, editors. Bayesian Statistics. (Vol. 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 169–193.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, et al. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2002;64(4):583–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfand AE, Dey DK, Chang H. Model determination using predictive distributions with implementation via sampling-based methods (with discussion). In: Bernardo JM, Berger JO, Dawid AP, Smith AFM, editors. Bayesian Statistics (Vol. 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 147–167.
   Google Scholar
• Davidian M, Giltinan DM. Some general estimation methods for nonlinear mixed-effects models. J Biopharm Stat. 1993;3(1):23–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Wu L. A joint model for nonlinear mixed-effects models with censoring and covariates measured with error, with application to AIDS studies. J Am Stat Assoc. 2002;97(460):955–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Liu W, Hu XJ. Joint inference on HIV viral dynamics and immune suppression in presence of measurement errors. Biometrics. 2010;66(2):327–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachos VH, Castro LM, Dey DK. Bayesian inference in nonlinear mixed-effects models using normal independent distributions. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2013;64:237–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar