Monte Carlo comparison of normality tests based on varentropy estimators

References

• Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communications. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948;27:379–423; 623–656. doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobkov S, Madiman M. Concentration of the information in data with log-concave distributions. Ann Prob. 2011;39:1528–1543. doi:10.1214/10-AOP592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontoyiannis I, Verdu S. Optimal lossless compression: source varentropy and dispersion. IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, Istanbul; 2013. p. 1739–1743.
   Google Scholar
• Kontoyiannis I, Verdu S. Optimal lossless compression: source varentropy and dispersion. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 2014;60:777–795. doi:10.1109/TIT.2013.2291007
   Google Scholar
• Arikan E. Varentropy decreases under the polar transform. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 2016;62:3390–3400. doi:10.1109/TIT.2016.2555841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buono F, Longobardi M. Varentropy of past lifetimes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.07423. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Di Crescenzo A, Paolillo L, Suárez-Llorens A. Stochastic comparisons, differential entropy and varentropy for distributions induced by probability density functions. Preprint arXiv:2103.11038v1. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Di Crescenzo A, Paolillo L. Analysis and applications of the residual varentropy of random lifetimes. Prob Eng Inf Sci. 2021;35:680–698. doi:10.1017/S0269964820000133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maadani S, Mohtashami Borzadaran GR, Rezaei Roknabadi AH. Varentropy of order statistics and some stochastic comparisons. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2021;51:6447–6460. doi:10.1080/03610926.2020.1861299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fradelizi M, Madiman M, Wang L. Optimal concentration of information content for logconcave densities. In: C Houdr´e, D Mason, P Reynaud-Bouret, J Rosi´nski, editors. High dimensional probability VII. Progress in probability, vol. 71. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Rioul O. Renyi entropy power inequalities via normal transport and rotation. Entropy . 2018;20:641. doi:10.3390/e20090641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Kundu C. Varentropy of doubly truncated random variable. Prob Eng Inf Sci. 2023;37:852–871. doi:10.1017/S0269964822000225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alizadeh Noughabi H, Shafaei Noughabi M. Varentropy estimators with applications in testing uniformity. J Stat Comput Simul. 2023;93:2582–2599. doi:10.1080/00949655.2023.2196627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agostino RB, Stephens MA, editors. Goodness-of-fit techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• von Mises R. Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und ihre Anwendung in der Statistik und theoretischen Physik. Leipzig and Vienna: Deuticke; 1931. doi:10.1002/zamm.19310110625
   Google Scholar
• Watson GS. Goodness of fit tests on a circle. Biometrika. 1961;48:109–114. doi:10.1093/biomet/48.1-2.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolmogorov AN. Sulla Determinazione Empirica di une legge di Distribuzione. Giornale dell’Intituto Italiano degli Attuari. 1933;4:83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Kuiper NH. Tests concerning random points on a circle. Proc Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Ser A. 1960;63:38–47.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson TW, Darling DA. A test of goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc. 1954;49:765–769. doi:10.1080/01621459.1954.10501232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteban MD, Castellanos ME, Morales D, et al. Monte Carlo comparison of four normality tests using different entropy estimates. Commun Stat–Simul Comput. 2001;30:761–285. doi:10.1081/SAC-100107780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli M, Alizadeh Noughabi H, Mohtashami Borzadaran GR. An estimation of Phi divergence and its application in testing normality. Hacettepe J Math Stat. 2020;49:2104–2118. doi:10.15672/hujms.629192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazarbashi S, Eid HA, Minguet J. Cancer incidence in Saudi Arabia: 2012 data from the Saudi cancer registry Asian Pacific. J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(9):2437–2444. doi:10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.9.2437. PMID: 28952273.
   Google Scholar
• Fayomi A, Khan S, Tahir MH, et al. A new extended Gumbel distribution: properties and application. PLoS One. 2022;17(5):e0267142. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain LJ, Englehardt M. Interval estimation for the two parameter double exponential distribution. Technometrics. 1973;15:875–887. doi:10.1080/00401706.1973.10489120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig P, Stephens MA. Tests of fit for the Laplace distribution with applications. Technometrics. 2000;42:417–424. doi:10.1080/00401706.2000.10485715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadati Nik A, Asgharzadeh A, Baklizi A. Inference based on new Pareto-type records with applications to precipitation and COVID-19 data. Stat Optim Inf Comput. 2023;11(2):243–257. doi:10.19139/soic-2310-5070-1591
   Google Scholar
• Bourguignon M, Saulo H, Fernandez RN. A new Pareto-type distribution with applications in reliability and income data. Physica A. 2016;457:166–175. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.03.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu T, Chen D, Chen P. Fatigue life analysis of cylindrical helical compression spring based on Weibull distribution. J Mech Strength. 2020;42:81–86.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Xie L, Yang Y, et al. A comparative study for parameter estimation of the Weibull distribution in a small sample size: an application to spring fatigue failure data. Qual Eng. 2023;35(4):553–565. doi:10.1080/08982112.2022.2158745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar