Testing independence: count data case

References

• Genest C, Nešlehová JG, Rémillard B, et al. Testing for independence in arbitrary distributions. Biometrika. 2019;106(1):47–68. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asy059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Székely GJ, Rizzo ML, Bakirov NK. Measuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances. Ann Stat. 2007;35(6):2769–2794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy A. Some copula-based tests of independence among several random variables having arbitrary probability distributions. Stat. 2020;9(1):Article ID e263. doi: 10.1002/sta4.v9.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller R, Heller Y, Gorfine M. A consistent multivariate test of association based on ranks of distances. Biometrika. 2013;100(2):503–510. doi: 10.1093/biomet/ass070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrett TB, Samworth RJ. Nonparametric independence testing via mutual information. Biometrika. 2019;106(3):547–566. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asz024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taskinen S, Oja H, Randles RH. Multivariate nonparametric tests of independence. J Am Stat Assoc. 2005;100(471):916–925. doi: 10.1198/016214505000000097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakirov NK, Rizzo ML, Székely GJ. A multivariate nonparametric test of independence. J Multivar Anal. 2006;97(8):1742–1756. doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2005.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocherlakota S, Kocherlakota K. On some tests for independence in nonnormal situations: Neyman's C(A) test. Commun Stat – Theory Methods. 1985;14(6):1453–1470. doi: 10.1080/03610928508828987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csörgő S. Testing for independence by the empirical characteristic function. J Multivar Anal. 1985;16(3):290–299. doi: 10.1016/0047-259X(85)90022-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kankainen A, Ushakov GN. A consistent modification of a test for independence based on the empirical characteristic function. J Math Sci. 1998;89(5):1486–1494. doi: 10.1007/BF02362283
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Gamero DM, Alba-Fernández MV, Ariza-López FJ. Approximating the null distribution of a class of statistics for testing independence. J Comput Appl Math. 2019;354:131–143. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2018.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meintanis SG, Iliopoulos G. Fourier methods for testing multivariate independence. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2008;52(4):1884–1895. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2007.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beran R, Bilodeau M, Lafaye de Micheaux P. Nonparametric tests of independence between random vectors. J Multivar Anal. 2007;98(9):1805–1824. doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2007.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chergui JD. Test of independence for discrete distributions based on the empirical probability generating function. Rev R Acad Cienc Exactas Fis Nat. 1996;90(3):179–182.
   Google Scholar
• Hawinkel S, Mattiello F, Bijnens L, et al. A broken promise: microbiome differential abundance methods do not control the false discovery rate. Brief Bioinformatics. 2019;20(1):210–221. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zambom AZ, Wang Q. Testing independence between discrete random variables. Commun Stat – Theory Methods. 2023;52(3):956–971. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2021.1934026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novoa-Muñoz F, Jiménez-Gameroa DM. Testing for the bivariate Poisson distribution. Metrika: Int J Theor Appl Stat. 2014;77(6):771–793. doi: 10.1007/s00184-013-0464-6
   Google Scholar
• Batsidis A, Lemonte AJ. On goodness-of-fit tests for the Neyman type A distribution. REVSTAT-Stat J. 2023;21(2):143–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milošević B, Jiménez-Gamero MD, Alba-Fernández MV. Quantifying the ratio-plot for the geometric distribution. J Stat Comput Simul. 2021;91(11):2153–2177. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2021.1887185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill B. Some useful moment results in sampling problems. Am Stat. 2014;68(4):282–296. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2014.966589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SX, Qin YL. A two-sample test for high-dimensional data with applications to gene-set testing. Ann Stat. 2010;38(2):808–835. doi: 10.1214/09-AOS716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touloumis A. Nonparametric stein-type shrinkage covariance matrix estimators in high-dimensional settings. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2015;83:251–261. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2014.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayyala DN, Park J, Roy A. Mean vector testing for high-dimensional dependent observations. J Multivar Anal. 2017;153:136–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2016.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J-T, Guo J, Zhou B, et al. A simple two-sample test in high dimensions based on l2-norm. J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115(530):1011–1027. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2019.1604366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu T, Zhang JT, Cheng MY. A global test for heteroscedastic one-way FMANOVA with applications. J Stat Plan Inference. 2024;231:Article ID 106133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amini-Seresht E, Milošević B. New nonparametric tests for independence. J Stat Comput Simul. 2020;90(7):1301–1314. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2020.1725007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomini R, Politis D, White H. A warp-speed method for conducting Monte Carlo experiments involving bootstrap estimators. Econometr Theor. 2013;29(3):567–589. doi: 10.1017/S0266466612000655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenreiro C. On the automatic selection of the tuning parameter appearing in certain families of goodness-of-fit tests. J Stat Comput Simul. 2019;89(10):1780–1797. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2019.1598409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell CR, Paulson AS. A new bivariate negative binomial distribution. Nav Res Logist Q. 1981;28(3):359–374. doi: 10.1002/nav.v28:3
   Google Scholar
• Barbiero A. Properties and estimation of a bivariate geometric model with locally constant failure rates. Ann Oper Res. 2022;312(1):3–22. doi: 10.1007/s10479-019-03165-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbiero A. A bivariate count model with discrete Weibull margins. Math Comput Simul. 2019;156:91–109. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2018.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung BC, Han SM, Lee J. Score tests for testing independence in the zero-truncated bivariate Poisson models. Commun Stat – Theory Methods. 2007;36(3):599–611. doi: 10.1080/03610920601001782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho N, Joo SJ, Kim JK, et al. Relation of habitual snoring with components of metabolic syndrome in Korean adults. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006;71(3):256–263. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papić R. Rural development policy on areas with natural constraints – effects on family farms and rural areas in the Republic of Serbia [dissertation]. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Marques MS, Pérez-Abrue V. A note on the limiting behavior of the empirical probability generating function. Comunicaciones Del Cimat; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Korolyuk VS, Borovskich YV. Theory of u-statistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Araujo A, Gine E. The central limit theorem for real and Banach valued random variables. New York: Wiley; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Adler RJ. An introduction to continuity, extrema, and related topics for general Gaussian processes, Vol. 12; 1990; p. i–155. (IMS lecture notes-monograph series).
   Google Scholar
• Jörgens K. Linear integral operators. (No Title); 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Roy D. Reliability measures in the discrete bivariate set-up and related characterization results for a bivariate geometric distribution. J Multivar Anal. 1993;46(2):362–373. doi: 10.1006/jmva.1993.1065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbiero A. A bivariate geometric distribution allowing for positive or negative correlation. Commun Stat – Theory Methods. 2019;48(11):2842–2861. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2018.1473428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genest C, Mesfioui M, Schulz J. A new bivariate Poisson common shock model covering all possible degrees of dependence. Stat Prob Lett. 2018;140:202–209. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2018.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz J, Genest C, Mesfioui M. A multivariate Poisson model based on comonotonic shocks. Int Stat Rev. 2021;89(2):323–348. doi: 10.1111/insr.v89.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikoloulopoulos AK. Copula-based models for multivariate discrete response data. In: Jaworski P, Durante F, Härdle WK, editors. Copulae in mathematical and quantitative finance. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 231–249.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy O. Copula-based tests of independence for bivariate discrete data [dissertation]. McGill University Montreal; 2013.
   Google Scholar