Importance of short-term continuing care plan adherence on long-term outcomes among patients discharged from residential substance use treatment

References

• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Improving the quality of health care for mental and substance-use conditions: quality chasm series. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O’Brien CP, Kleber HD. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: Implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. Jama 2000;284:1689–1695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan AT, McKay JR, Forman R, Cacciola J, Kemp J. Reconsidering the evaluation of addiction treatment: from retrospective follow-up to concurrent recovery monitoring. Addiction 2005;100:447–458. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01012.x
   Google Scholar
• McKay JR. Continuing care research: what we’ve learned and where we’re going. J Subst Abuse Treat 2009; 36:131–145. 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.10.004
   Google Scholar
• Proctor SL, Herschman PL. The continuing care model of substance use treatment: what works, and when is “enough,” “enough?”. Psychiatry J 2014;2014:1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/692423
   Google Scholar
• Miller NS, Hoffmann NG. Addictions treatment outcomes. Alcohol Treat Q 1995;12:41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann NG, Harrison PA. CATOR report: treatment outcome-adult inpatients two years later. Ramsey Clinic Department of Psychiatry: St. Paul, MN; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann NG, Harrison PA, Belille CA. Alcoholics anonymous after treatment: attendance and abstinence. Int J Addict 1983;18:311–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R. After drug treatment: are 12-step programs effective in maintaining abstinence? Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1999;25:93–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouimette PC, Moos RH, Finney JW. Influence of outpatient treatment and 12-step group involvement on one-year substance abuse treatment outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 1998;59:513–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman JA III. Compliance issues in primary care. J Clin Psychiatry 1996;57:83–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett DL. Methods of compliance research. In: Haynes R, Taylor D, Sackett D, Eds. Compliance in Health Care. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press;1979:323–333.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar J. Adherence to medical advice: a review. Int J Ment Health 1980;9:70–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMatteo RM, Giordani PJ, Lepper HS, Croghan T. Patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes: a meta-analysis. Med Care 2002;40:794–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll KM. Improving compliance with alcoholism treatment. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Project MATCH Monograph Series (Vol. 6), NIH Publication No. 97–4143. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism;1997.
   Google Scholar
• Moos RH, Finney JW, Cronkite RC. Alcoholism treatment: context, process and outcome. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse. Principles of drug addiction treatment: a research-based guide, 3rd. NIH Publication No. 12–4180. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Project MATCH Research Group. Project MATCH: rationale and methods for a multisite clinical trial matching patients to alcoholism treatment. Alcoholism: Clin Exp Res 1993;17: 1130–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Project MATCH Research Group. Matching patients with alcohol disorders to treatments: clinical implications from Project MATCH. J Ment Health 1998;7: 589–602. 10.1080/09638239817743
   Google Scholar
• Mattson ME, Del Boca FK, Carroll KM, Cooney NL, DiClemente CC, Donovan D, Zweben A. Compliance with treatment and follow-up protocols in Project MATCH: predictors and relationships to outcome. Alcoholism: Clin Exp Res 1998;22:1328–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satre DD, Chi FW, Mertens JR, Weisner CM. Effects of age and life transitions on alcohol and drug treatment outcome over nine years. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2012;73:459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin LR, Williams SL, Haskard KB, DiMatteo MR. The challenge of patient adherence. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2005;1:189–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lash SJ, Burden JL, Monteleone BR, Lehmann LP. Social reinforcement of substance abuse treatment aftercare participation: impact on outcome. Addict Behav 2004;29:337–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lash SJ, Blosser SL. Increasing adherence to substance abuse aftercare group therapy. J Subst Abuse Treat 1999;16:55–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lash SJ. Increasing participation in substance abuse aftercare treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1998;24:31–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 2004–2014. National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, BHSIS Series S-84, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 16–4986. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson DD, Joe GW, Fletcher BW, Hubbard RL, Anglin MD. A national evaluation of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;56:507–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Gerstein DR, Friedmann PD. Patients satisfaction and sustained outcomes of drug abuse treatment. J Health Psychol 2008;13: 388–400. 10.1177/1359105307088142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer DD, Catalano RF, Haggerty K, Gainey RR, Fleming CB. A meta-analysis of predictors of continued drug use during and after treatment for opiate addiction. Addiction 1998;93:73–92. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.931738.x
   Google Scholar
• Kedia S, Williams C. Predictors of substance abuse treatment outcomes in Tennessee. J Drug Educ 2003;33:25–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. A sociocognitive analysis of substance abuse: an agentic perspective. Psychol Sci 1999;10:214–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosyk B, Geller J, Guh DP, Oviedo-Joekes E, Brissette S, Marsh DC, Anis AH. The effect of motivational status on treatment outcome in the North American Opiate Medication Initiative (NAOMI) study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2010; 111:161–165. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.03.019
   Google Scholar
• Warren JI, Stein JA, Grella CE. Role of social support and self-efficacy in treatment outcomes among clients with co-occurring disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007;89:267–274. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.01.009
   Google Scholar
• DiClemente CC, Schlundt D, Gemmell L. Readiness and stages of change in addiction treatment. Am J Addict 2004;13: 103–119. 10.1080/10550490490435777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFife J, Drill R, Beinashowitz J, Ballantyne L, Plant D, Smith-Hansen L, Nakash O. Practice-based psychotherapy research in a public health setting: obstacles and opportunities. J Psychother Integr 2015;25:299–312.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins MS, Frazier SL, Cappella E. Hybrid research models: natural opportunities for examining mental health in context. Clin Psychology: Sci Pract 2006;13:105–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar