A comparison between two retrospective alcohol consumption measures and the daily drinking diary method with university students

References

• Holmes J, Angus C, Buykx P, Ally A, Stone T, Meier P, Brennan A. Mortality and morbidity risks from alcohol consumption in the UK: analyses using the Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model (v. 2.7) to inform the UK Chief Medical Officers’ review of the UK lower risk drinking guidelines. Sheffield: ScHARR, University of Sheffield; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gmel G, Rehm J. Measuring alcohol consumption. Contemp Drug Probs. 2004;31:467. doi:10.1177/009145090403100304.
   Google Scholar
• Del Boca FK, Noll JA. Truth or consequences: the validity of self‐report data in health services research on addictions. Addiction. 2000 Nov 1;95(11s3):347–60. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.95.11s3.5.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Midanik LT. Comparing usual quantity/frequency and graduated frequency scales to assess yearly alcohol consumption: results from the 1990 US National Alcohol Survey. Addiction. 1994 Apr 1;89(4):407–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alanko T. An overview of techniques and problems in the measurement of alcohol consumption. In: Smart RG, Cappell HD, Glaser FB, et al., eds. Research advances in alcohol and drug problems. Boston (MA): Springer; 1984. p. 209–26. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-2719-6_7.
   Google Scholar
• Connor J. Alcohol consumption as a cause of cancer. Addiction. 2017 Feb 1;112(2):222–28. doi:10.1111/add.13477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich JM, Orvis BR. Alcohol problems: patterns and prevalence in the US air force. Santa Monica (CA): RAND CORP; 1979 Jun.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald JL, Mulford HA. Self-report validity issues. J Stud Alcohol. 1987 May;48(3):207–11. doi:10.15288/jsa.1987.48.207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman S, Sanson-Fisher RW, Wilkinson C, Fahey PP, Gibberd RW. Agreement between two measures of alcohol consumption. J Stud Alcohol. 1987 Mar;48(2):104–08. doi:10.15288/jsa.1987.48.104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flegal KM. Agreement between two dietary methods in the measurement of alcohol consumption. J Stud Alcohol. 1990;51(5):408–14. doi:10.15288/jsa.1990.51.408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wyllie A, Zhang JF, Casswell S. Comparison of six alcohol consumption measures from survey data. Addiction. 1994 Apr 1;89(4):425–30. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb00917.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Alcohol consumption measures. Assess Alcohol Prob. 1995;2:75–99.
   Google Scholar
• Sobell LC, Maisto SA, Sobell MB, Cooper AM. Reliability of alcohol abusers’ self-reports of drinking behavior. Behav Res Ther. 1979 Jan 1;17(2):157–60. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(79)90025-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobell LC, Cunningham JA, Sobell MB, Agrawal S, Gavin DR, Leo GI, Singh KN. Fostering self-change among problem drinkers: a proactive community intervention. Addict Behav. 1996 Nov 1;21(6):817–33. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(96)00039-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham JA, Ansara D, Wild TC, Toneatto T, Koski-Jännes A. What is the price of perfection? The hidden costs of using detailed assessment instruments to measure alcohol consumption. J Stud Alcohol. 1999 Nov;60(6):756–58. doi:10.15288/jsa.1999.60.756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korotitsch WJ, Nelson-Gray RO. An overview of self-monitoring research in assessment and treatment. Psychol Assess. 1999 Dec;11(4):415. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.11.4.415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobell MB, Bogardis J, Schuller R, Leo GI, Sobell LC. Is self-monitoring of alcohol consumption reactive. Behav Assess. 1989 Jan 1;11(4):447–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Craig M, Annis HM. ‘Self-monitoring’ and ‘recall’ measures of alcohol consumption: convergent validity with biochemical indices of liver function. Alcohol Alcohol. 1982 Dec 1;17(3):117–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh DJ, Sitharthan T, Spilsbury G, Vignaendra S. An evaluation of brief correspondence programs for problem drinkers. Behav Ther. 1999 Sep 1;30(4):641–56. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(99)80030-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan LM. Developing and evaluating brief, computerised interventions for excessive drinkers [ Doctoral dissertation]. Bangor: University of Wales; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan LM. Relationships among alcohol use, emotion, motivation, and goals [ Doctoral dissertation]. Bangor: University of Wales; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline follow-back. In Measuring alcohol consumption. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ; 1992 (pp. 41–72).
   Google Scholar
• Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Alcohol Timeline Followback (TLFB). Handbook of psychiatric measures B2. Handbook of psychiatric measures. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000. p. 477–79.
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg P, Bohman M. The timeline follow back technique: psychometric properties of a 28-day timeline for measuring alcohol consumption. Ger J Psychiatry. 1998;2:62–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Leo GI, Cancilla A. Reliability of a timeline method: assessing normal drinkers’ reports of recent drinking and a comparative evaluation across several populations. Br J Addict. 1988 Apr;83(4):393–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun 1;15(2):155–63. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishburne JW, Brown JM. How do college students estimate their drinking? Comparing consumption patterns among quantity-frequency, graduated frequency, and timeline follow-back methods. J Alcohol Drug Educ. 2006 Mar 1;50(1):15.
   Google Scholar
• Rehm J, Dawson D, Frick U, Gmel G, Roerecke M, Shield KD, Grant B. Burden of disease associated with alcohol use disorders in the United States. Alcoholism. 2014 Apr 1;38(4):1068–77. doi:10.1111/acer.12331.
   Google Scholar