References
- Viergever RF, Olifson S, Ghaffar A, Terry RF. A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-8-36. Cited in PubMed; PMID:21159163.
- Yoshida S. Approaches, tools and methods used for setting priorities in health research in the 21st century. J Glob Health. 2016;6(1):1–10. doi:10.7189/jogh.06.010507. Cited in PubMed; PMID:26401271.
- Robinson KA, Saldanha IJ, Mckoy NA. Frameworks for determining research gaps during systematic reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011 Jun [cited 2018 Jul 2]. p. 95. (AHRQ publication; no. 11-EHC043-EF). https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-future-research-steps-framework_research.pdf.
- Ghaffar A. Setting research priorities by applying the combined approach matrix. Indian J Med Res. 2009;129(4):368–75. Cited in PubMed; PMID:19535830.
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Research recommendations process and methods guide [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2016 Jul [cited 2018 Jul 3]. p. 12. https://www.nice.org.uk/Media::/Default/About/what-we-do/Science-policy-and-research/research-recommendation-process-methods-guide-2015.pdf.
- Council on Health Research for Development. Essential national health research and priority setting: lessons learned [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland): Council on Health Research for Development; 1997 Jun [cited 2018 Jul 3]. p. 75. http://www.cohred.org/downloads/586.pdf.
- Robinson KA, Akinyede O, Dutta T, Sawin VI, Li T, Spencer MR, Weston C. Framework for determining research gaps during systematic review: evaluation [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013 Feb [cited 2018 Jul 2]. 66 p. (AHRQ publication; no. 13-EHC019-EF). https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-gaps_research.pdf.
- Saldanha IJ, Wilson LM, Bennett WL, Nicholson WK, Robinson KA. Development and pilot test of a process to identify research needs from a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(5):538–45. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.07.009. Cited in PubMed; PMID:22995855.
- Carey T, Yon A, Beadles C, Wines R. Prioritizing future research through examination of research gaps in systematic reviews [Internet]. Washington: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; 2012 Mar [cited 2018 Jul 2]. p. 44. https://www.pcori.org/assets/Prioritizing-Future-Research-through-Examination-of-Research-Gaps-in-Systematic-Reviews1.pdf.
- Lindson N, Richards‐Doran D, Heath L, Hartmann‐Boyce J. Setting research priorities in tobacco control: a stakeholder engagement project. Addiction. 2017;112(12):2257–71. doi:10.1111/add.13940. Cited in PubMed; PMID:28879662.
- Otto JL, Beech EH, Evatt DP, Belsher BE, Workman DE, Campbell MS. A systematic approach to the identification and prioritization of psychological health research gaps in the Department of Defense. Mil Psych. 2018; 30(6): 557–563. doi:10.1080/08995605.2018.1521683.
- Psychological Health Center of Excellence. Prioritized research gaps report for selected substance use disorder topics calendar year 2017 [Internet]. Falls Church (VA): Psychological Health Center of Excellence; 2018 Feb [cited 2018 Jul 2]. p. 44. http://www.pdhealth.mil/sites/default/files/images/docs/Research-Gaps_SUD-508-2017.pdf.
- Department of Defense (US); Department of Veterans Affairs (US); Department of Health and Human Services (US); Department of Education (US). National research action plan [Internet]. Washington: Department of Defense (US); 2013 Aug [cited 2018 Jul 2]. p. 56. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/nrap_for_eo_on_mental_health_august_2013.pdf.
- Merikangas KR, McClair VL. Epidemiology of substance use disorders. Hum Genet. 2012;131(6):779–89. doi:10.1007/s00439-012-1168-0. Cited in PubMed; PMID:22543841.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (US). Annual surveillance report of drug-related risks and outcomes – United States, 2017 [Internet]. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2017 Aug [cited 2018 Jul 2]. p. 83. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/pdf/pubs/2017-cdc-drug-surveillance-report.pdf.
- World Health Organization. Global status report on alcohol and health 2014 [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO Press; 2014 [cited 2018 Jul 2]. p. 100. http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/global_alcohol_report/msb_gsr_2014_1.pdf?ua=1.
- Bouchery EE, Harwood HJ, Sacks JJ, Simon CJ, Brewer RD. Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S., 2006. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(5):516–24. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.045. Cited in PubMed; PMID:22011424.
- Meadows SO, Engel CC, Collins RL, Beckman RL, Cefalu M, Hawes-Dawson J, Doyle M, Kress AM, Sontag-Padilla L, Ramchand R, et al. 2015. Department of Defense health related behaviors survey (HRBS) [Internet]. Santa Monica (CA): RAND Corporation; 2018 [cited 2018 Jul 2]. p. 435. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1695.html.
- Psychological Health Center of Excellence. Psychological health by the numbers: mental health disorder prevalence among active duty service members, 2005–2016 [Internet]. Falls Church (VA): Psychological Health Center of Excellence; 2017 Dec [cited 2018 Jul 2]. http://www.pdhealth.mil/research-analytics/psychological-health-numbers/mental-health-disorder-prevalence.
- Nahin RL. Severe pain in veterans: the effect of age and sex, and comparisons with the general population. J Pain. 2017;18(3):247–54. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2016.10.021. Cited in PubMed; PMID:22543841.
- Office of the Secretary of Defense (US). Report to Congress on prescription drug abuse [Internet]. Washington: Office of the Secretary of Defense (US); 2016 Jan [cited 2018 Jul 2]. p. 40. https://health.mil/Reference-Center/Reports/2016/04/15/Prescription-Drug-Abuse.
- Adams RS, Bauer MR, Lee S, Williams TV, Larson MJ Postdeployment treatment patterns among subgroups of soldiers with or without comorbidity of traumatic brain injury, psychological health problems, and chronic pain. Paper presented at: Military Health System Research Symposium; 2017 Aug 29; Kissimmee, FL.
- Namera A, Kawamura M, Nakamoto A, Saito T, Nagao M. Comprehensive review of the detection methods for synthetic cannabinoids and cathinones. Forensic Toxicol. 2015;33(2):175–94. doi:10.1007/s11419-015-0270-0. Cited in PubMed; PMID:26257831.
- Zawilska JB, Wojcieszak J. Designer cathinones – an emerging class of novel recreational drugs. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;231(1–3):42–53. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.015. Cited in PubMed; PMID:23890615.
- Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. “Military importance”: what does it mean and how can it be assessed objectively? MSMR. 2012;19(4):2–3. Cited in PubMed; PMID:23890615.
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (US). Misuse of prescription drugs [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute on Drug Abuse; 2018 Jan [cited 2018 Jul 5]. p. 39. https://d14rmgtrwzf5a.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/2609-misuse-of-prescription-drugs.pdf.
- Department of Veterans Affairs (US); Department of Defense (US). VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for opioid therapy for chronic pain [Internet]. Version 3.0. Washington: Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2017 Feb [cited 2018 Jul 5]. p. 198. https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/Pain/cot/VADoDOTCPG022717.pdf.
- Palpacuer C, Duprez R, Huneau A, Locher C, Boussageon R, Laviolle B, Naudet F. Pharmacologically controlled drinking in the treatment of alcohol dependence or alcohol use disorders: a systematic review with direct and network meta-analyses on nalmefene, naltrexone, acamprosate, baclofen and topiramate. Addiction. 2018;113(2):220–37. doi:10.1111/add.13974. Cited in PubMed; PMID:28940866.