Electronic monitoring devices during substance use treatment are associated with increased arrests among women in specialty courts

References

• Mitchell O, Wilson DB, Eggers A, MacKenzie DL. Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. J Crim Justice. 2012;40:60–71.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe DB, Hardin CD, Fox CL. Painting the current picture: a national report on drug courts and other problem-solving courts in the United States. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute; 2016 June.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice. Drug courts - NIJ, BJA and OJJDP information and resources. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Justice; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office. Studies show courts reduce recidivism, but DOJ could enhance future performance measure revision efforts. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Aos S, Miller M, Drake E. Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs, and crime rates. Olympia: WA Washington State Institute for Public Policy; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer DK. Reconsidering drug court effectiveness: A meta-analytic review [doctoral dissertation]. Cincinnati (OH): Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnat; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Latimer J, Morton-Bourgon K, Chrétien J-A. A meta-analytic examination of drug treatment courts: do they reduce recidivism? Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of Justice Canada ; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp CT, Holsinger AM, Latessa EJ. Are drug courts effective? A meta-analytic review. J Community Corrections. 2005;15:5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Messina N, Calhoun S, Warda U. Gender-responsive drug court treatment: A randomized controlled trial. Crim Justice Behav. 2012;39:1539–58.doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812453913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Justice. Drug courts: The second decade. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Minton TD, Ginder S, Brumbaugh SM, Smiley-McDonald H, Rohloff H. Census of jails: Population changes, 1999–2013. Washington (DC): Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• D’Angelo L, Wolf RV. Women and addiction: challenges for drug court practitioners. Justice Syst J. 2002;23:385–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis AR, McLeod P, Watt MC, Campbell MA, Adams-Quackenbush N. The role of gender in mental health court admission and completion. Can J Criminology Criminal Justice. 2016;58:1–30.doi:https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2015.E08.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer DK, Hartman JL, Listwan SJ. Drug abusing women in the community: the impact of drug court involvement on recidivism. J Drug Issues. 2009;39:803–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates TJ. Drug court: breaking the black magic spell of drug addiction for women:A qualitative study. Salt Lake City (UT): ProQuest Dissertations Publishing; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Morse DS, Cerulli C, Bedell P, Wilson JL, Thomas K, Mittal M, Lamberti JS, Williams G, Silverstein J, Mukherjee A, et al. Meeting health and psychological needs of women in drug treatment court. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014;46:150–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse DS, Silverstein J, Thomas K, Bedel P, Cerulli C. Finding the loopholes: a cross-sectional qualitative study of systemic barriers to treatment access for women drug court participants. Health Justice. 2015;3:1–9.doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-015-0026-2.
   Google Scholar
• Burrell WD, Gable RS. From BF skinner to spiderman to martha stewart: the past, present and future of electronic monitoring of offenders. J Offender Rehabil. 2008;46:101–18.doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670802143342.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Justice. Electronic monitoring reduces recidivism. Washington DC: Office of Justice Programs ; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman FS, Soule D, Gelb A. Graduated sanctions: stepping into accountable systems and offenders. Prison J. 1999;79:182–204.doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885599079002004.
   Google Scholar
• Finn MA, Muirhead-steves S. The effectiveness of electronic monitoring with violent male parolees. Justice Q. 2002;19:293–312.doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett KG, Bales WD, Blomberg TG. Under surveillance: an empirical test of the effectiveness and consequences of electronic monitoring. Criminol Public Policy. 2006;5:69–92.doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00102.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta J, Wallace-Capretta S, Rooney J. Can electronic monitoring make a difference? An evaluation of three canadian programs. Crime Delinq. 2000;46:61–75.doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128700046001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser D, Watts R. Electronic monitoring of drug offenders on probation. J Offender Monit. 1993;6:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur R, Aldrich L. What makes a domestic violence court work? Lessons from New York. Judges’ J. 2003;42:5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Government performance and results modernization act of 2010. 2017. Available from https://www.samhsa.gov/grants/gpra-measurement-tools/csat-gpra/csat-gpra-discretionary-services [last accessed 29 May 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Gainey RR, Payne BK, O’Toole M. The relationships between time in jail, time on electronic monitoring, and recidivism: an event history analysis of a jail-based program. Justice Q. 2000;17:733–52.doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820000094741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Molina MM, Reingle JM, Jennings WG. Does alcohol use predict violent behaviors? The relationship between alcohol use and violence in a nationally representative longitudinal sample. Youth Violence Juv Justice. 2011;9:99–111.doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204010384492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingle JM, Jennings WG, Komro KA. A case-control study of risk and protective factors for incarceration among urban youth. J Adolescent Health. 2013;53:471–77.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.05.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn MG, González JMR. Drug abuse and antisocial behavior: A biosocial life course approach. USA: Palgrave Macmillan; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Salas-Wright CP, Gonzalez JMR, Vaughn MG, Schwartz SJ, Jetelina KK. Age-related changes in the relationship between alcohol use and violence from early adolescence to young adulthood. Addict Behav Rep. 2016;4:13–17.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2016.05.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reingle JM, Staras SA, Jennings WG, Branchini J, Maldonado-Molina MM. The relationship between marijuana use and intimate partner violence in a nationally representative, longitudinal sample. J Interpers Violence. 2012;27:1562–78.doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511425787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar