References
- Cresta Morgado P, Carusso M, Alemany LA, Acion L. Practical foundations of machine learning for addiction research. Part I. Methods and techniques. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2021.1995739.
- Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I. Machine Learning in Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 4;380:1347–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1814259.
- Dong X, Rashidian S, Wang Y, Hajagos J, Kong J, Saltz M, Saltz J, Wang F. Machine learning based opioid overdose prediction using electronic health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020;2019:389–98.
- Hu Z, Jing Y, Xue Y, Fan P, Wang L, Vanyukov M, Kirisci L, Wang J, Tarter RE, Xie X-Q, et al. Analysis of substance use and its outcomes by machine learning: II. Derivation and prediction of the trajectory of substance use severity. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jan;206:1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107604.
- Graves RL, Tufts C, Meisel ZF, Polsky D, Ungar L, Merchant RM. Opioid discussion in the twittersphere. Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Nov 10;53:2132–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2018.1458319.
- W-h L-C, Huang JL, Zhang HH, Weiss JC, Wu Y, Kwoh CK, Donohue JM, Cochran G, Gordon AJ, Malone DC, et al. Evaluation of machine-learning algorithms for predicting opioid overdose risk among medicare beneficiaries with opioid prescriptions. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 22;2:e190968. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0968.
- Jing Y, Hu Z, Fan P, Xue Y, Wang L, Tarter RE, Kirisci L, Wang J, Vanyukov M, Xie X-Q, et al. Analysis of substance use and its outcomes by machine learning I. Childhood evaluation of liability to substance use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jan;206:1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107605.
- Sakoglu U, Mete M, Esquivel J, Rubia K, Briggs R, Adinoff B. Classification of cocaine‐dependent participants with dynamic functional connectivity from functional magnetic resonance imaging data. J Neurosci Res. 2019 Jul;97:790–803. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24421.
- Ashford RD, Brown AM, Curtis B. Substance use, recovery, and linguistics: the impact of word choice on explicit and implicit bias. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Aug;189:131–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.005.
- NIDA. Access to addiction services differs by race and gender. [internet]. National Institute on Drug Abuse website; 2019 [ Accessed 2021 Jun 12]. https://www.drugabuse.gov/about-nida/noras-blog/2019/07/access-to-addiction-services-differs-by-race-gender .
- NIDA. Summary [Internet]. National Institute on Drug Abuse website; 2021 [ Accessed 2021 Jun 12]. https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/substance-use-in-women/summary .
- Robinson WR, Renson A, Naimi AI. Teaching yourself about structural racism will improve your machine learning. Biostatistics. 2020 Apr 1;21:339–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxz040.
- Verma S, Rubin J Fairness definitions explained. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Fairness [Internet]; Gothenburg, Sweden. ACM; 2018 [2021 Jun 14].
- Valantine HA, Collins FS. National institutes of health addresses the science of diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015 Oct 6;112:12240–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515612112.
- Zhang BH, Lemoine B, Mitchell M Mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning. ArXiv180107593 Cs [Internet]; 2018 Jan 22 [ Accessed 2021 Jun 14]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.07593
- Kiluk BD, Carroll KM, Duhig A, Falk DE, Kampman K, Lai S, Litten RZ, McCann DJ, Montoya ID, Preston KL, et al. Measures of outcome for stimulant trials: ACTTION recommendations and research agenda. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jan;158:1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.11.004.
- Afshar M, Phillips A, Karnik N, Mueller J, To D, Gonzalez R, Price R, Cooper R, Joyce C, Dligach D, et al. Natural language processing and machine learning to identify alcohol misuse from the electronic health record in trauma patients: development and internal validation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Mar 1;26:254–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy166.
- Mojtabai R, Amin‐Esmaeili M, Nejat E, Olfson M. Misuse of prescribed opioids in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2019 5 Feb;28:345–353.
- Mete M, Sakoglu U, Spence JS, Devous MD, Harris TS, Adinoff B. Successful classification of cocaine dependence using brain imaging: a generalizable machine learning approach. BMC Bioinform. 2016 Oct;17:357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1218-z.
- Che Z, St Sauver J, Liu H, Liu Y. Deep learning solutions for classifying patients on opioid use. AMIA Annu Symp Proc AMIA Symp. 2018;2017:525–34.
- Boslett AJ, Denham A, Hill EL. Using contributing causes of death improves prediction of opioid involvement in unclassified drug overdoses in US death records. Addiction. 2020 Jul;115:1308–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14943.
- Savova GK, Masanz JJ, Ogren PV, Zheng J, Sohn S, Kipper-Schuler KC, Chute CG. Mayo clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System (cTAKES): architecture, component evaluation and applications. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Sep;17:507–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2009.001560.
- Hastings JS, Howison M, Inman SE. Predicting high-risk opioid prescriptions before they are given. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020 Jan 28;117:1917–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905355117.
- Whelan R, Watts R, Orr CA, Althoff RR, Artiges E, Banaschewski T, Barker GJ, Bokde ALW, Büchel C, Carvalho FM, et al. Neuropsychosocial profiles of current and future adolescent alcohol misusers. Nature. 2014 Aug;512:185–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13402.
- Gowin JL, Manza P, Ramchandani VA, Volkow ND. Neuropsychosocial markers of binge drinking in young adults [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 12]. Mol Psychiatry. Internet]. 2020 May 12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0771-z.
- Squeglia LM, Ball TM, Jacobus J, Brumback T, McKenna BS, Nguyen-Louie TT, Sorg SF, et al. Neural predictors of initiating alcohol use during adolescence. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;174:172–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15121587.
- Kass RE, Caffo BS, Davidian M, Meng X-L, Yu B, Reid N Ten simple rules for effective statistical practice. Lewitter Feditor PLOS Comput Biol. 2016Jun9;12:e1004961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004961
- Kakarmath S, Esteva A, Arnaout R, Harvey H, Kumar S, Muse E, Dong F, et al. Best practices for authors of healthcare-related artificial intelligence manuscripts. Npj Digital Medicine. 2020 Dec;3:134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00336-w.
- Collins GS, Moons KGM. Reporting of artificial intelligence prediction models. The Lancet. 2019 Apr;393:1577–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30037-6.
- Figueroa RL, Zeng-Treitler Q, Kandula S, Ngo LH. Predicting sample size required for classification performance. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Dec 12;12:8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-8.
- Mukherjee S, Tamayo P, Rogers S, Rifkin R, Engle A, Campbell C, Golub TR, Mesirov JP. Estimating dataset size requirements for classifying DNA microarray data. J Comput Biol. 2003 Apr;10:119–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/106652703321825928.
- EQUATOR network [Internet]. Available at: https://www.equator-network.org [last accessed Jan 2021].
- Luo W, Phung D, Tran T, Gupta S, Rana S, Karmakar C, Shilton A, Yearwood J, Dimitrova N, Ho TB, et al. Guidelines for developing and reporting machine learning predictive models in biomedical research: a multidisciplinary view. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2016;18:e323.
- Liu X, Rivera SC, Moher D, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK, SPIRIT-AI, CONSORT-AI WG. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. Nat Med. 2020;26:11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1034-x
- Sounderajah V, Ashrafian H, Aggarwal R, De Fauw J, Denniston AK, Greaves F, Karthikesalingam A, King D, Liu X, Markar SR, et al. Developing specific reporting guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies assessing AI interventions: the STARD-AI steering group. Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26:807–08. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0941-1.
- Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162:55. doi:https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-0697.
- Moons KGM, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, Ioannidis JPA, Macaskill P, Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, et al. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:W1–73.
- Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, De Vet HCW, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5527.
- van Smeden M, Penning De Vries BBL, Nab L, Groenwold RHH. Approaches to addressing missing values, measurement error and confounding in epidemiologic studies. J Clin Epidemiol. Internet]. 2020 Nov [cited 2020 Nov 30]. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0895435620311756.
- Van Buuren S. The book flexible imputation of missing data [Internet]. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 2018. Availableat: https://stefvanbuuren.name/fimd [last accessed Jun 2021].
- Andreas CM, Guido S. Introduction to Machine Learning with Python. First ed. California, USA: O’Reilly Media, Inc; 2017.
- Duboue P. The Art of Feature Engineering: essentials for Machine Learning [Internet]. 1st ed. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2020.
- Peng RD, Matsui E The art of data science [Internet]. 2017 [ Accessed 2020 Oct 28]. https://bookdown.org/rdpeng/artofdatascience
- The Turing Way Community, Becky A, Bowler L, Gibson S, Herterich P, Higman R, Krystalli A, et al. The turing way: a handbook for reproducible data science (version v0.0.4) [Internet]. Zenodo. 2019.
- Chollet F, Allaire JJ. Deep learning with R. Shelter Island, NY: Manning Publications Co; 2018. p. 335.
- James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R An introduction to statistical learning [Internet]. New York: Springer New York; 2013 [ cited 2020 Jun 10]. (Springer Texts in Statistics; vol. 103). http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7
- Géron A. Hands-On machine learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow. 2nd ed. California, USA: O’Reilly Media, Inc; 2019. p. 851.
- Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70:213–20.doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026256.
- Krippendorff K. Estimating the reliability, systematic error, and random error of interval data. Educ Psychol Meas. 1970;30:61–70.doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000105.
- Koch G. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. In: Kotz S, Johnson N, editors. Intraclass correlation coefficient. First ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1982. p. 213–17.
- Steyerberg EW. 15.3 calibration. In: Clinical prediction models: a practical approach to development, validation, and updating [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. cited 2021 Jun 14]. p. 297–306. (Statistics for Biology and Health; Series Editors: Gail M, Samet JM, Singer B.). Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-16399-0
- Brabec J, Machlica L Bad practices in evaluation methodology relevant to class-imbalanced problems. In Montréal, Canada; 2018 [ Accessed 2020 Nov 30]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.01388
- Gupta A, Tatbul N, Marcus R, Zhou S, Lee I, Gottschlich J. Class-Weighted evaluation metrics for imbalanced data classification. ArXiv201005995 Cs [Internet]; 2020 Oct 12 [Accessed 2020 Nov 30]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.05995
- Finlayson SG, Subbaswamy A, Singh K, Bowers J, Kupke A, Zittrain J, Kohane IS, Saria S. The clinician and dataset shift in artificial intelligence. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 15;385:283–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2104626.
- Van Calster B, McLernon DJ, van Smeden M, Wynants L, Steyerberg EW. On behalf of Topic Group ‘Evaluating diagnostic tests and prediction models’ of the STRATOS initiative. Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics. BMC Med. 2019 Dec;17:230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1466-7.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135–60.doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204.
- Thrun S, Pratt L Learning to Learn. 1st Springer; US 1998. Vol. VIII 354.
- Open Science Framework [Internet]. Available at: https://osf.io [last accessed Jun 2021].
- GitHub [Internet]. Available at: https://github.com [last accessed Jun 2021].
- GitLab [Internet]. Availableat: https://gitlab.com [last accessed Jun 2021].
- Wickham H, Grolemund G R for data science [Internet]. 1st ed. California (USA): O’Reilly Media, Inc; 2017. Available at: https://r4ds.had.co.nz [last accessed Jun 2021].
- Kluyver T, Ragan-Kelley B, Pérez F, Granger B, Bussonnier M, Frederic J, Kelley K, et al, et al. Jupyter Notebooks—a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. In: Presented at: positioning and power in Academic Publishing: players, agents and agendas; 2016 Jun 7–9; Göttingen, Germany. IOS Press.