References
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed. DSM-III. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 1980.
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed. Revised DSM-III-R. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Press; 1987.
- Hasin DS, O’Brien CP, Auriacombe M, Borges G, Bucholz K, Budney A, Compton WM, Crowley T, Ling W, Petry NM, et al. DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: recommendations and rationale. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170:834–51.
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. DSM-IV. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Text Revision. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
- Blanco C, Harford TC, Nunes E, Grant B, Hasin D. The latent structure of marijuana and cocaine use disorders: results from the national longitudinal alcohol epidemiologic survey (NLAES). Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;91:91–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.04.003.
- Chen F, Yang H, Bulut O, Cui Y, Xin T. Examining the relation of personality factors to substance use disorder by explanatory item response modeling of DSM-5 symptoms. PLoS One. 2019;14:1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217630.
- Gillespie NA, Neale MC, Prescott CA, Aggen SH, Kendler KS. Factor and item-response analysis DSM-IV criteria for abuse of and dependence on cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens, sedatives, stimulants and opioids. Addiction. 2007;102:920–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01804.x.
- Hasin DS, Fenton MC, Beseler C, Park JY, Wall MM. Analyses related to the development of DSM-5 criteria for substance use related disorders: 2. Proposed DSM-5 criteria for alcohol, cannabis, cocaine and heroin disorders in 663 substance abuse patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;122:28–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.005.
- Lane SP, Steinley D, Sher KJ. Meta-analysis of DSM alcohol use disorder criteria severities: structural consistency is only ‘skin deep.’ Psychol Med. 2016;46:1769–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716000404.
- Saha TD, Compton WM, Chou SP, Smith S, Ruan WJ, Huang B, Pickering RP, Grant BF. Analyses related to the development of DSM-5 criteria for substance use related disorders: 1. Toward amphetamine, cocaine and prescription drug use disorder continua using item response theory. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;122:38–46.
- Keyes KM, Krueger RF, Grant BF, Hasin DS. Alcohol craving and the dimensionality of alcohol disorders. Psychol Med. 2011;41:629–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329171000053X.
- Kervran C, Shmulewitz D, Serre F, Stohl M, Denis C, Hasin D, Auriacombe M. Item response theory analysis of DSM-5 substance use disorder criteria in French outpatienet addiction clinical participants. How much is craving special? Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;212:108036. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108036.
- Cherpitel CJ, Borges G, Ye Y, Bond J, Cremonte M, Moskalewicz J, Swiatkiewicz G. Performance of a craving criterion in DSM alcohol use disorders. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010;71:674–84.
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
- Borsboom D. A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2017;16:5–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20375.
- Borsboom D, Cramer AO. Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:91–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608.
- Costantini G, Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Perugini M, Mõttus R, Waldorp L, Cramer AOJ. State of the at personality research: a tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R. J Res Pers. 2015;54:13–29.
- Newman ME. Modularity and community structure in networks. Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103:8577–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601602103.
- Robinaugh DJ, Millner AJ, McNally RJ. Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network. J Abnorm Psychol. 2016;125:747–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000181.
- Kendler KS, Zachar P, Craver C. What kinds of things are psychiatric disorders? Psychol Med. 2011;41:1143–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291710001844.
- Baggio S, Sapin M, Khazaal Y, Studer J, Wolff H, Gmel G. Comorbidity of symptoms of alcohol and cannabis use disorders among a population-based sample of simultaneous users. Insight from a network perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:2893. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122893.
- Hoffman M, Steinley D, Trull TJ, Sher KJ. Criteria definitions and network relations: the importance of criterion thresholds. Clin Psychol Sci. 2018;6:506–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617747657.
- Lin SY, Fried EI, Eaton NR. The association of life stress with substance use symptoms: a network analysis and replication. J Abnorm Psychol. 2020;129:204–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000485.
- Rhemtulla M, Fried EI, Aggen SH, Tuerlinckx F, Kendler KS, Borsboom D. Network analysis of substance abuse and dependence symptoms. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;161:230–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.02.005.
- Epskam S, Fried EI. A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychol Methods. 2018;23:617–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000167.
- Miele GM, Carpenter KM, Cockerham MS, Trautman KD, Blaine J, Hasin DS. Substance Dependence Severity Scale (SDSS): reliability and validity of a clinician-administered interview for DSM-IV substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000;59:63–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00111-8.
- Dacosta‐Sánchez D, Fernández‐Calderón F, González‐Ponce B, Díaz‐Batanero C, Lozano OM. Severity of substance use disorder: utility as an outcome in clinical settings. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019;43:869–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14020.
- Rodriguez A, Reise SP, Haviland MG. Evaluating bifactor models: calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychol Methods. 2016;21:137–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045.
- Finney SJ, DiStefano C. Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In: Structural equation modeling: a second course. 2nd ed. Charlotte (NC): IAP Information Age Publishing; 2013. p. 439–92.
- Rosseel Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48:1–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
- Dalege J, Borsboom D, van Harreveld F, van der Maas HL. Network analysis on attitudes: a brief tutorial. Soc Psychol Pers Sci. 2017;8:528–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617709827.
- Van Borkulo C, Borsboom D, Epskamp S, Blanken T, Boschloo L, Schoevers RA, Waldorp LJ. A new method for constructing networks from binary data. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5918.
- Haslbeck JM, Waldorp LJ. mgm: structure estimation for time-varying mixed graphical models in high-dimensional data. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1510 06871. 2015;30:39–81.
- Marsman M, Borsboom D, Kruis J, Epskamp S, van Bork R, Waldorp LJ, Maas HLJVD, Maris G. An introduction to network psychometrics: relating ising network models to item response theory models. Multivariate Behav Res. 2018;53:15–35.
- Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:217–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.110.
- Haslbeck JM, Waldorp LJ. How well do network models predict observations? On the importance of predictability in network models. Behav Res Methods. 2018;50:853–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0910-x.
- Observatorio Español de Drogas y Adicciones. Informe 2018: alcohol, tabaco y drogas ilegales en España. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar Social; 2018.
- Rodebaugh TL, Tonge NA, Piccirillo ML, Fried EI, Horenstein A, Morrison AS, Goldin P, Gross JJ, Lim MH, Fernandez KC, et al. Does centrality in a cross-sectional network suggest intervention targets for social anxiety disorder? J Clin Consulting. 2018;86:831–44.
- Hoffart A, Johnson SU. Latent trait, latent-trait state, and a network approach to mental problems and their mechanisms of change. Clin Psychol Sci. 2020;8:595–613. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702620901744.