Linguistic predictors from Facebook postings of substance use disorder treatment retention versus discontinuation

References

• Kleber HD, Weiss RD, Anton RF, George TP, Greenfield SF, Kosten TR, O’-Brien CP, Rounsaville BJ, Strain EC, Ziedonis DM, et al. Treatment of patients with substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:3–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brorson HH, Ajo Arnevik E, Rand-Hendriksen K, Duckert F. Drop-Out from addiction treatment: a systematic review of risk factors. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33:1010–24. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şimşek M, Dinç M, Ögel K. Determinants of the addiction treatment drop-out rates in an addiction counseling centre: a cross-sectional study. Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019;29:446–54. doi:10.1080/24750573.2018.1505283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaul ME, Svikis DS, Moore RD. Predictors of outpatient treatment retention: patient versus substance use characteristics. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001;62:9–17. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(00)00155-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SJ, Marsch LA, Hancock JT, Das AK. Scaling up research on drug abuse and addiction through social media big data. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19. doi:10.2196/jmir.6426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves TM. Language as social action: social psychology and language use. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2002; 2013/07/04/. p 253.
   Google Scholar
• Shutler L, Nelson LS, Portelli I, Blachford C, Perrone J. Drug use in the twittersphere: a qualitative contextual analysis of tweets about prescription drugs. J Addict Dis. 2015;34:303–10. doi:10.1080/10550887.2015.1074505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller PG, Sønderlund AL. Using the internet to research hidden populations of illicit drug users: a review. Addict. 2010;105:1557–67. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02992.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichstaedt JC, Smith RJ, Merchant RM, Ungar LH, Crutchley P, Preoţiuc-Pietro D, Asch DA, Schwartz HA. Facebook language predicts depression in medical records. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S a. 2018;115:11203–08. doi:10.1073/pnas.1802331115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J Lang Soc Psychol. 2010;29:24–54. doi:10.1177/0261927X09351676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guntuku SC, Schneider R, Pelullo A, Young J, Wong V, Ungar L, Polsky D, Volpp KG, Merchant R. Studying expressions of loneliness in individuals using twitter: an observational study. Bmj Open. 2019;9:e030355. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guntuku SC, Sherman G, Stokes DC, Agarwal AK, Seltzer E, Merchant RM, Ungar LH. Tracking mental health and symptom mentions on twitter during covid-19. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35:2798–800. doi:10.1007/s11606-020-05988-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis B, Giorgi S, Ungar L, Vu H, Yaden D, Liu T, Yadeta K, Schwartz HA. AI-based analysis of social media language predicts addiction treatment dropout at 90 days. Unpublished MS2021.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanpour S, Tomita N, DeLise T, Crosier B, Marsch LA. Identifying substance use risk based on deep neural networks and Instagram social media data. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;44:487–94. doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0247-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsch LA. Digital health data-driven approaches to understand human behavior. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021;46:191–96. doi:10.1038/s41386-020-0761-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart R, Velupillai S. Applied natural language processing in mental health big data. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021;46:252–53. doi:10.1038/s41386-020-00842-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Giorgi S, Tao X, Bellew D, Curtis B, Ungar L. Cross-Platform Different Facebook and Text Messages Language Use: Illustrated by Depression Diagnosis. arXiv. 2022. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2202.01802.
   Google Scholar
• Kornfield R, Toma CL, Shah DV, Moon TJ, Gustafson DH. What do you say before you relapse? how language use in a peer-to-peer online discussion forum predicts risky drinking among those in recovery. Health Commun. 2018;33:1184–93. doi:10.1080/10410236.2017.1350906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding T, W Bickel, S Pan, editors Multi-View unsupervised user feature embedding for social media-based substance use prediction. 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing; 2017 2017/09; Copenhagen, Denmark. Copenhagen, Denmark: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Jha D, Singh R. Analysis of associations between emotions and activities of drug users and their addiction recovery tendencies from social media posts using structural equation modeling. BMC Bioinform. 2020;21:554. doi:10.1186/s12859-020-03893-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras L, Khazaal Y, Khan R, Mohr S, Kaufmann Y-A, Zullino D, Huguelet P, Allamani A, Bastos FI, Brown B, et al. Dialogue. Substance Use & Misuse. 2010;45:2357–410. doi:10.3109/1082608100374761110.3109/10826081003747611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly JF, Moos R. Dropout from 12-step self-help groups: prevalence, predictors, and counteracting treatment influences. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2003;24:241–50. doi:10.1016/S0740-5472(03)00021-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deane FP, Wootton DJ, Hsu C-I, Kelly PJ. Predicting dropout in the first 3 months of 12-step residential drug and alcohol treatment in an Australian sample. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012;73:216–25. doi:10.15288/jsad.2012.73.216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hai AH, Franklin C, Park S, DiNitto DM, Aurelio N. The efficacy of spiritual/religious interventions for substance use problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;202:134–48. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.04.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenthaler SJ, Blum K, Braverman ER, Giordano J, Thompson B, Oscar-Berman M, Badgaiyan RD, Madigan MA, Dushaj K, Li M, et al. Nida-Drug addiction treatment outcome study (datos) relapse as a function of spirituality/religiosity. J Reward Deficiency Syndr. 2015;1:36–45. doi:10.17756/jrds.2015-007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galanter M, Dermatis H, Bunt G, Williams C, Trujillo M, Steinke P. Assessment of spirituality and its relevance to addiction treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007;33:257–64. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.06.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace JM, Forman TA. 1998. Religion’s role in promoting health and reducing risk among American youth. Health Educ Behav. 25:721–41. doi:10.1177/109019819802500604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadirian A-M, Salehian S. Is spirituality effective in addiction recovery and prevention? J Bahá’í Stud. 2018;28:69–88. doi:10.31581/jbs-28.4-5(2018).
   Google Scholar
• Pardini DA, Plante TG, Sherman A, Stump JE.Religious faith and spirituality in substance abuse recovery: determining the mental health benefits. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2000;19:347–54. doi:10.1016/S0740-5472(00)00125-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason SJ, Deane FP, Kelly PJ, Crowe TP. Do spirituality and religiosity help in the management of cravings in substance abuse treatment? Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44:1926–40. doi:10.3109/10826080802486723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson EAR, Krentzman AR, Webb JR, Brower KJ. Six-Month changes in spirituality and religiousness in alcoholics predict drinking outcomes at nine months. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011;72:660–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman MM, Rahaman MM, Hamadani JD, Mustafa K, Islam SMS.Psycho-Social factors associated with relapse to drug addiction in bangladesh. J Subst Use. 2016;21:627–30. doi:10.3109/14659891.2015.1122099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kober H. Emotion regulation in substance use disorders. In: James J. Gross, ed. Handbook of emotion regulation. 2 ed. New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press; 2014. pp. 428–46.
   Google Scholar
• Nordheim K, Walderhaug E, Alstadius S, Kern-Godal A, Arnevik E, Duckert F. Young adults reasons for dropout from residential substance use disorder treatment. Qual Social Work. 2018;17:24–40. doi:10.1177/1473325016654559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altavilla D, Acciai A, Deriu V, Chiera A, Adornetti I, Ferretti F, Bassi A, Colonna Z, De Luca V, Canali S.Linguistic analysis of self-narratives of patients with gambling disorder. Addict Disord Their Treat. 2020;19:209–17. doi:10.1097/ADT.0000000000000229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson BL.The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. Am Psychol. 2001;56:218–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siahpush M, Spittal M, Singh GK. Happiness and life satisfaction prospectively predict self-rated health, physical health, and the presence of limiting, long-term health conditions. Am J Health Promot. 2008;23:18–26. doi:10.4278/ajhp.061023137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen AM. A role for neuropsychology in understanding the facilitating influence of positive affect on social behavior and cognitive processes. In: Shane J. Lopez &C.R. Snyder, eds. Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford library of psychology. second ed. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press; 2009. pp. 503–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kaniuka AR, Kelliher Rabon J, Brooks BD, Sirois F, Kleiman E, Hirsch JK. Gratitude and suicide risk among college students: Substantiating the protective benefits of being thankful. J Am Coll Health. 2020;1–8. doi:10.1080/07448481.2019.1705838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estévez A, Jáuregui P, Sánchez-Marcos I, López-González H, Griffiths MD. Attachment and emotion regulation in substance addictions and behavioral addictions. J Behav Addict. 2017;6:534–44. doi:10.1556/2006.6.2017.086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottonello M, Fiabane E, Pistarini C, Spigno P, Torselli E. Difficulties in emotion regulation during rehabilitation for alcohol addiction: correlations with metacognitive beliefs about alcohol use and relapse risk. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019;15:2917–25. doi:10.2147/NDT.S214268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss NH, Forkus SR, Contractor AA, Schick MR. Difficulties regulating positive emotions and alcohol and drug misuse: a path analysis. Addict Behav. 2018;84:45–52. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.03.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park G, Schwartz HA, Sap M, Kern ML, Weingarten E, Eichstaedt JC, Berger J, Stillwell DJ, Kosinski M, Ungar LH, et al. Living in the past, present, and future: measuring temporal orientation with language. J Pers. 2017;85:270–80. doi:10.1111/jopy.12239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards TM, Holtzman NS. A meta-analysis of correlations between depression and first person singular pronoun use. J Res Pers. 2017;68:63–68. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipp AJ, Aeon B. Temporal focus: thinking about the past, present, and future. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019;26:37–43. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman EA, Silver RC. Getting “stuck” in the past: Temporal orientation and coping with trauma. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74:1146–63. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl K, Schönfeld S, Hissbach J, Küsel S, Zurowski B, Moritz S, Hohagen F, Kordon A. Differences and similarities between obsessive and ruminative thoughts in obsessive-compulsive and depressed patients: a comparative study. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011;42:454–61. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli S, Cardaci M, Scrima F, Caci B. Time perspective and facebook addiction: the moderating role of neuroticism. Cur Psychol. 2021. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01355-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipp AJ, Edwards JR, Lambert LS. Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: the subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2009;110:1–22. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake L, Duncan E, Sutherland F, Abernethy C, Henry C. Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time Soc. 2008;17:47–61. doi:10.1177/0961463X07086304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keough KA, Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 1999;21:149–64. doi:10.1207/S15324834BA210207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams J, Nettle D. Time perspective, personality and smoking, body mass, and physical activity: an empirical study. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14:83–105. doi:10.1348/135910708X299664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette JA, Hessling R, Gibbons FX, Reis-Bergan M, Gerrard M. Using images to increase exercise behavior: prototypes versus possible selves. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005;31:610–20. doi:10.1177/0146167204271589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins RN, Bryan A. Relationships between future orientation, impulsive sensation seeking, and risk behavior among adjudicated adolescents. J Adolesc Res. 2004;19:428–45. doi:10.1177/0743558403258860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett E, Spruijt-Metz D, Unger JB, Rohrbach LA, Sun P, Sussman S. Bidirectional associations between future time perspective and substance use among continuation high-school students. Subst Use Misuse. 2013;48:574–80. doi:10.3109/10826084.2013.787092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chodkiewicz J, Nowakowska K. Temporal orientation and a course of alcohol addiction therapy. Psychiatr Pol. 2011;45:177–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancu M, Jobes D, Wagner BM, Greene JA, Fratto TA. Are there linguistic markers of suicidal writing that can predict the course of treatment? a repeated measures longitudinal analysis. Archiv Suicide Res. 2016;20:438–50. doi:10.1080/13811118.2015.1040935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson B, Goldin PR, Kurita K, Gross JJ.Self-Representation in social anxiety disorder: linguistic analysis of autobiographical narratives. Behav Res Ther. 2008;46:1119–25. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2008.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Boyd RL, Jordan K, Blackburn K. The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ding T, F Hasan, W Bickel, S Pan, editors. Interpreting social media-based substance use prediction models with knowledge distillation. 2018 IEEE 30th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI); 2018: Volos, Greece; IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Treatment episode data set (TEDS): 2019. Admissions to and discharges from publicly funded substance use treatment. Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2021. [accessed 2022 March 1] https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/reports/rpt35314/2019_TEDS_3-1-22.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mandrekar JN.Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thoracic Oncol. 2010;5:1315–16. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui M, T Baldwin, editors Langid.Py: an off-the-shelf language identification tool. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2012 System Demonstrations; 2012; 2012/07//; Jeju Island, Korea. Jeju Island, Korea: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz HA, Giorgi S, Sap M, Crutchley P, Ungar L, Eichstaedt J, editor Dlatk: differential language analysis toolkit. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations; 2017; Copenhagen, Denmark: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Eichstaedt jC, Kern ML, Yaden DB, Schwartz HA, Giorgi S, Park G, Hagan C, Tobolsky V, Smith LK, Buffone A, et al. Closed and open vocabulary approaches to text analysis: A review, quantitative comparison, and recommendations. 2020; 2020/11/16/. Available from: https://psyarxiv.com/t52c6/.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol). 1995;57:289–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI. Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res. 2003;3:993–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum AK. Mallet: a machine learning for language toolkit. 2002; [updated 2002]. Available from: http://mallet.cs.umass.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield A, M Magnusson, D Mimno, editors Pulling out the stops: rethinking stopword removal for topic models. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; 2017; Valencia, Spain: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz HA, Eichstaedt JC, Kern ML, Dziurzynski L, Ramones SM, Agrawal M, Shah A, Kosinski M, Stillwell D, Seligman MEP, et al. Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: the open-vocabulary approach. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73791. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaden D, Eichstaedt J, Kern M, Smith L, Buffone A, Stillwell D, Kosinski M, Ungar L, Seligman M, Schwartz H. The language of religious affiliation: Social, emotional, and cognitive differences. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017;9:444–52. doi:10.1177/1948550617711228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell J. A circumplex model of affect. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39:1161–78. 10.1037/h0077714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner J, Russell JA, Peterson BS. The circumplex model of affect: an integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 2005;17:715–34. doi:10.1017/S0954579405050340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preoţiuc-Pietro D, Schwartz HA, Park G, Eichstaedt J, Kern M, Ungar L, Shulman E, editors. Modelling valence and arousal in facebook posts. Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis; 2016 2016/06//; San Diego, California. San Diego, California: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz HA, Park G, Sap M, Weingarten E, Eichstaedt J, Kern M, Stillwell D, Kosinski M, Berger J, Seligman M, editor(s). Extracting human temporal orientation from Facebook language. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies; 2015; Denver, Colorado: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig HG. Religion, spirituality, and health: the research and clinical implications. Isrn Psychiatry. 2012;2012. doi:10.5402/2012/278730.
   Google Scholar
• George LK, Ellison CG, Larson DB. Explaining the relationships between religious involvement and health. Psychol Inq. 2002;13:190–200. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1303_04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kub J, Solari-Twadell PA. Religiosity/spirituality and substance use in adolescence as related to positive development: a literature review. J Addict Nurs. 2013;24:247–62. doi:10.1097/JAN.0000000000000006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart C, Koeske G, Pringle J. Religiosity as a predictor of successful post-treatment abstinence for African-American clients. J Soc Work Pract Addict. 2008;7:75–92.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins E, Teasdale JD. Adaptive and maladaptive self-focus in depression. J Affect Disord. 2004;82:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2003.10.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Jang J, Park J, Lee CH. The effect of religion on the human mind: Analyses of language use and personality. Psychologia. 2011;54:145–55. doi:10.2117/psysoc.2011.145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedikides C, Gebauer JE. Religion and the self. In: Saroglou V, ed. Religion, Personality, and Social Behavior. New York (NY): Psychology Press;2013 pp. 56–80.
   Google Scholar
• Gable PA, Harmon-Jones E. Approach-Motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention. Psychol Sci. 2008;19:476–82. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02112.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert KE.The neglected role of positive emotion in adolescent psychopathology. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012;32:467–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alim TN, Lawson WB, Feder A, Iacoviello BM, Saxena S, Bailey CR, Greene AM, Neumeister A. Resilience to meet the challenge of addiction. Alcohol Res. 2012;34:506–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohatt GV, Rasmus SM, Thomas L, Allen J, Hazel K, Marlatt GA. Risk, resilience, and natural recovery: a model of recovery from alcohol abuse for Alaska natives. Addiction. 2008;103:205–15. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02057.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeppner BB, Schick MR, Carlon H, Hoeppner SS. Do self-administered positive psychology exercises work in persons in recovery from problematic substance use? an online randomized survey. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019;99:16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss NH, Risi MM, Bold KW, Sullivan TP, Dixon-Gordon KL. Daily relationship between positive affect and drinking to cope: the moderating role of difficulties regulating positive emotions. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45:189–98. doi:10.1080/00952990.2018.1508470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick MR, Weiss NH, Contractor AC, Thomas ED, Spillane NS. Positive emotional intensity and substance use: the underlying role of positive emotional avoidance in a community sample of military veterans. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021;0:1–10. doi:10.1080/00952990.2020.1868488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseferidi S-I, Griva F, Anagnostopoulos F. Time to get happy: Associations of time perspective with indicators of well-being. Psychol, Health Med. 2017;22:618–24. doi:10.1080/13548506.2016.1226508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsman P, Verduyn P, Ayduk O, Kross E. Being present: Focusing on the present predicts improvements in life satisfaction but not happiness. Emotion. 2017;17:1047–51. doi:10.1037/emo0000333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, King LA. Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77:1296–312. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fast LA, Funder DC. Personality as manifest in word use: Correlations with self-report, acquaintance report, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;94:334–46. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terracciano A, Löckenhoff C, Crum R, Bienvenu O, Costa P. Five-Factor model personality profiles of drug users. BMC Psychiatry. 2008;8. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-8-22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar