243
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Threats to external validity in the neuroprediction of substance use treatment outcomes

&
Pages 5-20 | Received 20 Mar 2022, Accepted 21 Aug 2022, Published online: 13 Sep 2022

References

  • Finney JW, Moos RH. The long-term course of treated alcoholism: II. Predictors and correlates of 10-year functioning and mortality. J Stud Alcohol. 1992;53:142–53. doi:10.15288/jsa.1992.53.142.
  • Decker KP, Peglow SL, Samples CR, Cunningham TD. Long-Term outcomes after residential substance use treatment: relapse, morbidity, and mortality. Mil Med. 2017;182:e1589–e1595. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00560.
  • Satre DD, Mertens JR, Areán PA, Weisner C. Five-Year alcohol and drug treatment outcomes of older adults versus middle-aged and younger adults in a managed care program. Addiction. 2004;99:1286–97. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00831.x.
  • Brownell KD, Marlatt GA, Lichtenstein E, Wilson GT. Understanding and preventing relapse. Am Psychol. 1986;41:765–82. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.7.765.
  • McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O’Brien CP, Kleber HD. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. Jama. 2000;284:1689–95. doi:10.1001/jama.284.13.1689.
  • Proctor SL, Herschman PL. The continuing care model of substance use treatment: what works, and when is “enough,” “enough?”. Psychiatr J. 2014;2014:692423. doi:10.1155/2014/692423.
  • Chang G, Martin KB, Tang M, Fleming JA. Inpatient hospitalization for substance use disorders one year after residential rehabilitation: predictors among US veterans. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2016;42:56–62. doi:10.3109/00952990.2015.1088863.
  • Oliver JA, McClernon FJ. Precision medicine in addiction research: where has the time gone? Addiction. 2017;112:2096–97.
  • Reske M, Paulus MP. Predicting treatment outcome in stimulant dependence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1141:270–83. doi:10.1196/annals.1441.011.
  • Forster SE, Dickey MW, Forman SD. Regional cerebral blood flow predictors of relapse and resilience in substance use recovery: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;185:93–105. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.12.009.
  • Moeller SJ, Paulus MP. Toward biomarkers of the addicted human brain: using neuroimaging to predict relapse and sustained abstinence in substance use disorder. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatr. 2018;80:143–54. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.03.003.
  • Garrison KA, Potenza MN. Neuroimaging and biomarkers in addiction treatment. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014;16:513. doi:10.1007/s11920-014-0513-5.
  • Volkow ND, Baler RD. Brain imaging biomarkers to predict relapse in alcohol addiction. JAMA Psychiat. 2013;70:661–63. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1141.
  • Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:652–69. doi:10.1038/nrn3119.
  • Braus DF, Wrase J, Grüsser S, Hermann D, Ruf M, Flor H, Mann K, Heinz A. Alcohol-Associated stimuli activate the ventral striatum in abstinent alcoholics. J Neural Transm. 2001;108:887–94. ( Vienna, Austria : 1996). doi:10.1007/s007020170038.
  • Grüsser SM, Wrase J, Klein S, Hermann D, Smolka MN, Ruf M, Weber-Fahr W, Flor H, Mann K, Braus DF, et al. Cue-Induced activation of the striatum and medial prefrontal cortex is associated with subsequent relapse in abstinent alcoholics. Psychopharmacology. 2004;175:296–302. doi:10.1007/s00213-004-1828-4.
  • Gabrieli JDE, Ghosh SS, Whitfield-Gabrieli S. Prediction as a humanitarian and pragmatic contribution from human cognitive neuroscience. Neuron. 2015;85:11–26. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.047.
  • Kranzler HR, Smith RV, Schnoll R, Moustafa A, Greenstreet-Akman E. Precision medicine and pharmacogenetics: what does oncology have that addiction medicine does not? Addiction. 2017;112:2086–94. doi:10.1111/add.13818.
  • Volkow ND. Personalizing the treatment of substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2020;177:113–16. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19121284.
  • Marhe R, Luijten M, van de Wetering BJ, Smits M, Franken IH. Individual differences in anterior cingulate activation associated with attentional bias predict cocaine use after treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:1085–93. doi:10.1038/npp.2013.7.
  • Luo SX, Martinez D, Carpenter KM, Slifstein M, Nunes EV. Multimodal predictive modeling of individual treatment outcome in cocaine dependence with combined neuroimaging and behavioral predictors. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;143:29–35. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.04.030.
  • Forster SE, Finn PR, Brown JW. Neural responses to negative outcomes predict success in community-based substance use treatment. Addiction. 2017;112:884–96. doi:10.1111/add.13734.
  • Seo D, Lacadie CM, Tuit K, Hong K-I, Constable RT, Sinha R. Disrupted ventromedial prefrontal function, alcohol craving, and subsequent relapse risk. JAMA Psychiat. 2013;70:727–39. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.762.
  • Kukull WA, Ganguli M. Generalizability: the trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology. 2012;78:1886–91. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812.
  • Blanco C, Olfson M, Okuda M, Nunes EV, Liu SM, Hasin DS. Generalizability of clinical trials for alcohol dependence to community samples. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;98:123–28. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.05.002.
  • Humphreys K, Weingardt KR, Harris AHS. Influence of subject eligibility criteria on compliance with National Institutes of Health guidelines for inclusion of women, minorities, and children in treatment research. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31:988–95. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00391.x.
  • Moberg CA, Humphreys K. Exclusion criteria in treatment research on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use disorders: a review and critical analysis. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2017;36:378–88. doi:10.1111/dar.12438.
  • Okuda M, Hasin DS, Olfson M, Khan SS, Nunes EV, Montoya I, Liu SM, Grant BF, Blanco C. Generalizability of clinical trials for cannabis dependence to community samples. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;111:177–81. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.04.009.
  • Reese ED, Kane LF, Paquette CE, Frohlich F, Daughters SB. Lost in translation: the gap between neurobiological mechanisms and psychosocial treatment research for substance use disorders. Curr Addicti Rep. 2021;8:440–51. doi:10.1007/s40429-021-00382-8.
  • Andersson HW, Wenaas M, Nordfjærn T. Relapse after inpatient substance use treatment: a prospective cohort study among users of illicit substances. Addict Behav. 2019;90:222–28. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.11.008.
  • Najt P, Fusar-Poli P, Brambilla P. Co-Occurring mental and substance abuse disorders: a review on the potential predictors and clinical outcomes. Psychiatry Res. 2011;186:159–64. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.07.042.
  • McCabe SE, West BT, Jutkiewicz EM, Boyd CJ. Multiple DSM-5 substance use disorders: a national study of US adults. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2017;32:10.1002/hup.2625. doi:10.1002/hup.2625.
  • Fisher JA, Kalbaugh CA. Challenging assumptions about minority participation in US clinical research. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:2217–22. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300279.
  • Choy T, Baker E, Stavropoulos K. Systemic racism in EEG research: considerations and potential solutions. Affective Sci. 2021;3:14–20.
  • Chakraborty BH, Steinhauer SR. Reporting of minority participation rates and racial differences in schizophrenia and psychophysiological research: improving but still not adequate. Schizophr Res. 2010;123:90–91. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2010.06.006.
  • SAMHSA. National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS): 2019, data on substance abuse treatment facilities. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2020.
  • Weisberg HI, Hayden VC, Pontes VP. Selection criteria and generalizability within the counterfactual framework: explaining the paradox of antidepressant-induced suicidality? Clin Trials. 2009;6:109–18. doi:10.1177/1740774509102563.
  • Susukida R, Crum RM, Hong H, Stuart EA, Mojtabai R. Comparing pharmacological treatments for cocaine dependence: incorporation of methods for enhancing generalizability in meta-analytic studies. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018;27:e1609. doi:10.1002/mpr.1609.
  • Reske M. What neuroimaging has and has not yet added to our understanding of addiction. 2013;108:1357–59. doi:10.1111/add.12175.
  • Whelan R, Garavan H. When optimism hurts: inflated predictions in psychiatric neuroimaging. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;75:746–48. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.014.
  • Scheinost D, Noble S, Horien C, Greene AS, Lake EM, Salehi M, Gao S, Shen X, O’Connor D, Barron DS, et al. Ten simple rules for predictive modeling of individual differences in neuroimaging. NeuroImage. 2019;193:35–45. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.057.
  • Yip SW, Kiluk B, Scheinost D. Toward addiction prediction: an overview of cross-validated predictive modeling findings and considerations for future neuroimaging research. Biol Psychiatr Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020;5:748–58. doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.11.001.
  • CLARITY. Tool to assess risk of bias in longitudinal symptom research studies aimed at the general population. Hamilton (Ontario): CLARITY Group at McMaster University; 2018.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;339:b2535.
  • Motschman CA, Gass JC, Wray JM, Germeroth LJ, Schlienz NJ, Munoz DA, Moore FE, Rhodes JD, Hawk LW, Tiffany ST. Selection criteria limit generalizability of smoking pharmacotherapy studies differentially across clinical trials and laboratory studies: a systematic review on varenicline. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;169:180–89. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.018.
  • Robinson SM, Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Leo GI. Reliability of the timeline followback for cocaine, cannabis, and cigarette use. Psychol Addictive Behav. 2014;28:154–62. doi:10.1037/a0030992.
  • Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline follow-back: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten RZ, Allen JP, eds. Measuring alcohol consumption: psychosocial and biochemical methods. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press; 1992. p. 41–72.
  • McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Woody GE, O’Brien CP, Druley KA. Predicting response to alcohol and drug abuse treatments. Role of psychiatric severity. Arch Gen Psychiatr. 1983;40:620–25. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1983.04390010030004.
  • Dutra L, Stathopoulou G, Basden SL, Leyro TM, Powers MB, Otto MW. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:179–87. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06111851.
  • Jakubczyk A, Ilgen MA, Kopera M, Krasowska A, Klimkiewicz A, Bohnert A, Blow FC, Brower KJ, Wojnar M. Reductions in physical pain predict lower risk of relapse following alcohol treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;158:167–71. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.11.020.
  • Roncero C, Palma-Álvarez RF, Díaz-Morán S, Grau-López L, Rodríguez-Cintas L, Ros-Cucurull E, Álvarez AI, Casas M, Daigre C. Cocaine relapse and health-related quality of life: a 23 weeks study. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2019;47:37–44.
  • Marek S, Tervo-Clemmens B, Calabro FJ, Montez DF, Kay BP, Hatoum AS, Donohue MR, Foran W, Miller RL, Hendrickson TJ, et al. Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals. Nature. 2022;603:654–60. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04492-9.
  • Tanaka SC, Yamashita A, Yahata N, Itahashi T, Lisi G, Yamada T, Ichikawa N, Takamura M, Yoshihara Y, Kunimatsu A, et al. A multi-site, multi-disorder resting-state magnetic resonance image database. Sci Data. 2021;8:227. doi:10.1038/s41597-021-01004-8.
  • Tian D, Zeng Z, Sun X, Tong Q, Li H, He H, Gao J-H, He Y, Xia M. A deep learning-based multisite neuroimage harmonization framework established with a traveling-subject dataset. NeuroImage. 2022;257:119297. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119297.
  • Jovicich J, Barkhof F, Babiloni C, Herholz K, Mulert C, van Berckel BNM, Frisoni GB. Harmonization of neuroimaging biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases: a survey in the imaging community of perceived barriers and suggested actions. Alzheimer’s Dementia. 2019;11:69–73. ( Amsterdam, Netherlands).
  • Carter CS, Barch DM, Bullmore E, Breiling J, Buchanan RW, Butler P, Cohen JD, Geyer M, Gollub R, Green MF, et al. Cognitive neuroscience treatment research to improve cognition in schizophrenia II: developing imaging biomarkers to enhance treatment development for schizophrenia and related disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;70:7–12. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.01.041.
  • Poldrack RA, Huckins G, Varoquaux G. Establishment of best practices for evidence for prediction: a review. JAMA Psychiat. 2020;77:534–40. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3671.
  • Schnack HG, Kahn RS. Detecting neuroimaging biomarkers for psychiatric disorders: sample size matters. Fron Psychiatr. 2016;7:50. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00050.
  • Vabalas A, Gowen E, Poliakoff E, Casson AJ, Hernandez-Lemus E. Machine learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size. PloS One. 2019;14:e0224365. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0224365.
  • Varma S, Simon RJBB. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection. BMC Bioinform. 2006;7:1–8.
  • Zhai T, Gu H, Yang Y. Cox regression based modeling of functional connectivity and treatment outcome for relapse prediction and disease subtyping in substance use disorder. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:1520. doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.768602.
  • Shen X, Finn ES, Scheinost D, Rosenberg MD, Chun MM, Papademetris X, Constable RT. Using connectome-based predictive modeling to predict individual behavior from brain connectivity. Nat Protoc. 2017;12:506–18. doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.178.
  • Jollans L, Boyle R, Artiges E, Banaschewski T, Desrivières S, Grigis A, Martinot J-L, Paus T, Smolka MN, Walter H, et al. Quantifying performance of machine learning methods for neuroimaging data. NeuroImage. 2019;199:351–65. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.082.
  • Nielsen AN, Barch DM, Petersen SE, Schlaggar BL, Greene DJ. Machine learning with neuroimaging: evaluating its applications in psychiatry. Biol Psychiatr. 2020;5:791–98. doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.11.007.
  • Janssen RJ, Mourão-Miranda J, Schnack HG. Making individual prognoses in psychiatry using neuroimaging and machine learning. Biol Psychiatr. 2018;3:798–808. doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.04.004.
  • Tejavibulya L, Rolison M, Gao S, Liang Q, Peterson H, Dadashkarimi J, Farruggia MC, Hahn CA, Noble S, Lichenstein SD, et al. Predicting the future of neuroimaging predictive models in mental health. Mol Psychiatry. 2022. doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01635-2.
  • Thomas Insel MD, Cuthbert BsPh.D., Marjorie Garvey MB, Robert Heinssen BCHsPh.D., Pine DS, Kevin Quinn MDsPh.D., Sanislow CsPh.D., Wang P, M.D.D.R.P.H. National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MdResearch Domain Criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:748–51. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379.
  • Lesko CR, Buchanan AL, Westreich D, Edwards JK, Hudgens MG, Cole SR. Generalizing study results: a potential outcomes perspective. Epidemiology. 2017;28:553–61. doi:10.1097/EDE.0000000000000664.
  • Meier MH, Hall W, Caspi A, Belsky DW, Cerdá M, Harrington HL, Houts R, Poulton R, Moffitt TE. Which adolescents develop persistent substance dependence in adulthood? using population-representative longitudinal data to inform universal risk assessment. Psychol Med. 2016;46:877–89. doi:10.1017/S0033291715002482.
  • Jacobs B, Beems T, Stulemeijer M, van Vugt AB, van der Vliet TM, Borm GF, Vos PE. Outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: age and clinical variables are stronger predictors than CT abnormalities. J Neurotrauma. 2009;27:655–68. doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1059.
  • Fleisher AS, Sun S, Taylor C, Ward CP, Gamst AC, Petersen RC, Jack CR, Aisen PS, Thal LJ. Volumetric MRI vs clinical predictors of Alzheimer disease in mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2008;70:191. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000287091.57376.65.
  • Marcoulides GA, Drezner Z. Tabu search variable selection with resource constraints. Commun Stat - Simul Comput. 2004;33:355–62. doi:10.1081/SAC-120037240.
  • Forster SE, Forman SD, Gancz NN, Siegle GJ, Dickey MW, Steinhauer SR. Electrophysiological predictors and indicators of contingency management treatment response: rationale and design for the ways of rewarding abstinence project (WRAP). Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021;23:100796. doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100796.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.