Psychometric properties of the Fletcher Recovery Housing Alliance Measure (FRHAM-12)

References

• Polcin DL. Communal living settings for adults recovering from substance abuse. J Groups Addict Recover. 2009 Jan 1;4:7–22. doi:10.1080/15560350802712355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaskutas LA. The social model approach to substance abuse recovery: a program of research and evaluation. Berkeley, California: Alcohol Research Group;1999pp. 1–247p.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly JF Report of findings from a systematic review of the scientific literature on recovery support services in the United States [Internet]. Recovery Research Institute; 2017 [cited 2022 Aug 16] p. 1–95. https://www.mass.gov/doc/recovery-support-research-literature-review-submitted-by-kim-krawczyk/download
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Behavioral Health. Building recovery: state policy guide for supporting recovery housing [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 Aug 16]. https://opioidresponsenetwork.org/ResourceMaterials/6.29.18%20recovery%20housing%20toolkit.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jason LA, Wiedbusch E, Bobak TJ, Taullahu D. Estimating the number of substance use disorder recovery homes in the United States. Alcohol Treat Q. 2020 Oct 1;38:506–14. doi:10.1080/07347324.2020.1760756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mericle AA, Patterson D, Howell J, Subbaraman MS, Faxio A, Karriker-Jaffe KJ. Identifying the availability of recovery housing in the U.S.: the NSTARR project. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Jan 1;230:109188. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Affording housing models and recovery [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 16]. https://www.samhsa.gov/homelessness-programs-resources/hpr-resources/affording-housing-models-recovery
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Recovery housing: best practices and suggested guidelines [Internet]. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2018. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/housing-best-practices-100819.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jason LA, Ferrari JR. Oxford house recovery homes: characteristics and effectiveness. Psychol Serv. 2010;7:92–102. doi:10.1037/a0017932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Korcha R, Bond J, Galloway G. Eighteen-month outcomes for clients receiving combined outpatient treatment and sober living houses. J Subst Use. 2010 Oct;15:352–66. doi:10.3109/14659890903531279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mericle AA, Slaymaker V, Gliske K, Ngo Q, Subbaraman MS. The role of recovery housing during outpatient substance use treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Feb;133:108638. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Recovery housing policy brief [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Aug 23]. https://www.hudexchange.info/resource/4852/recovery-housing-policy-brief/
   Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Mahoney E, Mericle AA. Psychometric properties of the recovery home environment scale. Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56:1161–68. doi:10.1080/10826084.2021.1910710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaskutas LA, Greenfield TK, Borkman TJ, Room JA. Measuring treatment philosophy: a scale for substance abuse recovery programs. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1998 Jan;15:27–36. doi:10.1016/S0740-5472(97)00246-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brorson HH, Ajo Arnevik E, Rand-Hendriksen K, Duckert F. Drop-out from addiction treatment: a systematic review of risk factors. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Dec;33:1010–24. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crits-Christoph P, Gibbons MBC, Hearon B. Does the alliance cause good outcome? recommendations for future research on the alliance. Psychoth: Theory Res Pract Training. 2006;43:280–85. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.43.3.280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampold B, Mondin G, Moody M, Stich F, Benson K, Nie AH. A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: empirically, “all must have prizes. Psychol Bull. 1997 Nov 1;122:203–15. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.122.3.203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran JM, Safran JD, Waizmann V, Bolger K, Muran JC. The alliance negotiation scale: psychometric construction and preliminary reliability and validity analysis. Psychother Res. 2012;22:710–19. doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.709326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath AO, Del Re AC, Flückiger C, Symonds D. Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2011 Mar;48:9–16. doi:10.1037/a0022186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersoug A, Høglend P, Havik OE, Monsen JT. Development of working alliance over the course of psychotherapy. Psychol Psychotherapy: Theory Res Pract. 2010 Jun;83:145–59. doi:10.1348/147608309X471497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardito RB, Rabellino D Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Front Psychology [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2021 Oct 18];2. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00270/abstract
   Google Scholar
• Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of working alliance. Psychothe: Theory Res Pract. 1979;16:252–60. doi:10.1037/h0085885.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. J Couns Psychol. 1989;36:223–33. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey TJ, Kokotovic AM. Factor structure of the working alliance inventory. Psychol Assess: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989 Sep;1:207–10. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.1.3.207.
   Google Scholar
• Gaston L. Reliability and criterion-related validity of the California psychotherapy alliance scales-patient version. Psychol Assess: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Mar 1;3:68–74. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.3.1.68.
   Google Scholar
• Delsignore A, Rufer M, Moergeli H, Emmerich J, Schlesinger J, Milos G, Schulte-Vels T, Weidt S. California psychotherapy alliance scale (CALPAS): psychometric properties of the German version for group and individual therapy patients. Compr Psychiatry. 2014;55:736–42. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.11.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier PS, Donmall MC, Barrowclough C, McElduff P, Heller RF. Predicting the early therapeutic alliance in the treatment of drug misuse. Addiction. 2005;100:500–11. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01031.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budman SH, Soldz S, Demby A, Feldstein M, Springer T, Davis MS. Cohesion, alliance and outcome in group psychotherapy. Psychiatry. 1989 Aug;52:339–50. doi:10.1080/00332747.1989.11024456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jason LA, Stevens E, Ram D. Development of a three factor psychological sense of community scale. J Community Psychol. 2015 Nov;43:973–85. doi:10.1002/jcop.21726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens E, Guerrero M, Green A, Jason LA. Relationship of hope, sense of community, and quality of life. J Community Psychol. 2018 Jul;46:567–74. doi:10.1002/jcop.21959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook S, Heather N, McCambridge J. United Kingdom alcohol treatment trial research team. The role of the working alliance in treatment for alcohol problems. Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Jun;29:371–81. doi:10.1037/adb0000058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPSS Statistics | IBM [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 19]. https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics
   Google Scholar
• Taber KS. The use of cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018 Dec 1;48:1273–96. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forero C, Maydeu-Olivares A, Gallardo-Pujol D Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: a monte carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal[Internet]. 2009 [cited 2022 Aug 16];16(4). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10705510903203573
   Google Scholar
• Shi D, Maydeu-Olivares A. The effect of estimation methods on SEM fit indices. Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Jun;80:421–45. doi:10.1177/0013164419885164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Modell Multidiscip J. 1999 Jan 1;6:1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awang Z. Research methodology and data analysis. Second ed. Kelantan, Malaysia: UiTM Press; 2012p 335p.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew TT, Joy EE, Gundel BE. Clients’ hope for counseling as a predictor of outcome in psychotherapy. Couns Psychol. 2021 Nov;49:1126–46. doi:10.1177/00110000211033255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff M, Levit S. Correlates of therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes among Israeli female methadone patients. Res Soc Work Pract. 2010 Jul;20:380–90. doi:10.1177/1049731509347854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross EC, Polaschek DLL, Ward T. The therapeutic alliance: a theoretical revision for offender rehabilitation. Aggress Violent Behav. 2008 Nov;13:462–80. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2008.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jason LA, Bobak T, Islam M, Guerrero M, Light JM, Stoolmiller M. Individual and contextual protective and risk characteristics for residents of recovery homes. Alcohol Treat Q. 2022 Apr 3;40:191–204. doi:10.1080/07347324.2021.1987179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heale R, Twycross A. Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evid Based Nurs. 2015 Jul;18:66–67. doi:10.1136/eb-2015-102129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith AEM, Msetfi RM, Golding L. Client self rated adult attachment patterns and the therapeutic alliance: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr 1;30:326–37. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson D, Skidmore S, Akay-sullivan S. The influence of trauma symptoms on the therapeutic alliance across treatment. J Couns Dev. 2020 Jan 1;98:29–40. doi:10.1002/jcad.12297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinger U, Jennissen S, Rek I Attachment style of volunteer counselors in telephone emergency services predicts counseling process. Frontiers in Psychology [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Aug 16];10. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01936
   Google Scholar