Many leveled ordinal models for frequency of alcohol and drug use

References

• Ryan A, Holmes J, Hunt V, Dunlop A, Mammen K, Holland R, Sutton Y, Sindhusake D, Rivas G, Lintzeris N. Validation and implementation of the Australian treatment outcomes profile in specialist drug and alcohol settings. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014;33:33–42. doi:10.1111/dar.12083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahr SJ, Hoffmann JP, Yang X. Parental and peer influences on the risk of adolescent drug use. J Prim Prev. 2005;26:529–51. doi:10.1007/s10935-005-0014-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundborg P. Young people and alcohol: an econometric analysis. Addiction. 2002;97:1573–82. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00231.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranford JA, Zucker RA, Jester JM, Puttler LI, Fitzgerald HE. Parental alcohol involvement and adolescent alcohol expectancies predict alcohol involvement in male adolescents. Psychol Addict Behav. 2010;24:386–96. doi:10.1037/a0019801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JE, O’Leary CC, Striley CW, Abdallah AB, Bradford S, Cottler LB. Effects of major depression on crack use and arrests among women in drug court. Addiction. 2011;106:1279–86. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03389.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedeker D. Methods for multilevel ordinal data in prevention research. Prev Sci. 2015;16:997–1006. doi:10.1007/s11121-014-0495-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner B, Riggs P, Mikulich-Gilbertson S. The importance of distribution-choice in modeling substance use data: a comparison of negative binomial, beta binomial, and zero-inflated distributions. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2015;41:489–97. doi:10.3109/00952990.2015.1056447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziak JJ, Li R, Zimmerman MA, Buu A. Time-varying effect models for ordinal responses with applications in substance abuse research. Stat Med. 2014;33:5126–37. doi:10.1002/sim.6303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedeker D, Mermelstein RJ. Analysis of longitudinal substance use outcomes using ordinal random-effects regression models. Addiction. 2000;95:381–94. doi:10.1080/09652140020004296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai T, Xia Y, Zhou Y. Generalized inflated discrete models: a strategy to work with multimodal discrete distributions. Sociol Methods Res. 2021;50:365–400. doi:10.1177/0049124118782535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitkin M. Applications of the Bayesian bootstrap in finite population inference. J Off Stat. 2008;24:21–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spertus JA, Jones PG, Maron DJ, O’Brien SM, Reynolds HR, Rosenberg Y, Stone GW, Harrell FE Jr, Boden WE, Weintraub WS, et al. Health-status outcomes with invasive or conservative care in coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1408–19. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1916370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürkner PC, Vuorre M. Ordinal regression models in psychology: a tutorial. Adv Method Pract Psychol Sci. 2019;2:77–101. doi:10.1177/2515245918823199.
   Google Scholar
• Bürkner PC. Brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J Stat Softw. 2017;80:1–28. doi:10.18637/jss.v080.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stan Development Team. Stan Modeling Language Users Guide and Reference Manual. 2022. https://mc-stan.org.
   Google Scholar
• Gabry J, Mahr T. Bayesplot: plotting for Bayesian Models. R package version 1.8.1; 2021. https://mc-stan.org/bayesplot/.
   Google Scholar
• Vehtari A, Gelman A, Gabry J. Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Stat Comput. 2017;27:1413–32. doi:10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison PD. Logistic regression using SAS: theory and application. 2nd ed. Cary (NC): SAS institute; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. Appl Stat. 2005;54:507–54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürkner PC. Bayesian item response modeling in R with brms and Stan. J Stat Softw. 2021;100:100. doi:10.18637/jss.v100.i05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh P. Regression models for ordinal data. J R Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol). 1980;42:109–42. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Essentials of count data regression. In: Baltagi BH, editor. A companion to theoretical econometrics. Chapter 15. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing; 2003. pp. 331–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay D, DeSantis SM, Korte JE, Brady KT. Some considerations for excess zeroes in substance abuse research. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2011;37:376–82. doi:10.3109/00952990.2011.568080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho CM, Polson NG, Scott JG. Handling sparsity via the Horseshoe. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics; 2009; pp. 73–80; Clearwater Beach, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowski D, Kurowicka D, Joe H. Generating random correlation matrices based on vines and extended onion method. J Multivar Anal. 2009;100:1989–2001. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2009.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehtari A, Gelman A, Simpson D, Carpenter B, Burkner, P.C. Rank-normalization, folding, and localization: an improved Ȓ for assessing convergence of MCMC (with Discussion)*†. Bayesian Anal. 2021;16:667–718. doi:10.1214/20-BA1221.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers MS, Drovandi C. Simulated cannabis days-of-use data. Dryad data repository; 2022. doi:10.5061/dryad.1vhhmgqx1.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB. Bayesian data analysis. 3rd ed. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bender R, Grouven U. Using binary logistic regression models for ordinal data with non-proportional odds. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:809–16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435698000663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell FE. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis. Heidelberg (Germany): Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Scott SC, Goldberg MS, Mayo NE. Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:45–55. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00312-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Shepherd BE, Li C, Harrell FE Jr. Modeling continuous response variables using ordinal regression. Stat Med. 2017;36:4316–35. doi:10.1002/sim.7433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts JM, Brewer DD. Measures and tests of heaping in discrete quantitative distributions. J Appl Stat. 2001;28:887–96. doi:10.1080/02664760120074960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Heitjan DF. Modeling heaping in self-reported cigarette counts. Stat Med. 2008;27:3789–804. doi:10.1002/sim.3281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell L, Fry TR, Harris MN. A pack a day for 20 years’: smoking and cigarette pack sizes. Appl Econ. 2011;43:2833–42. doi:10.1080/00036840903389838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland S. Alternative models for ordinal logistic regression. Stat Med. 1994;13:1665–77. doi:10.1002/sim.4780131607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowal DR, Wu B. Semiparametric count data regression for self-reported mental health. Biometrics. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Diener HC, Bussone G, Oene JCV, Lahaye M, Schwalen S, Goadsby PJ. Topiramate reduces headache days in chronic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:814–23. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01326.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houle TT, Turner DP, Houle TA, Smitherman TA, Martin V, Penzien DB, Lipton RB. Rounding behavior in the reporting of headache frequency complicates headache chronification research. Headache. 2013;53:908–19. doi:10.1111/head.12126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litt MD, Kleppinger A, Judge JO. Initiation and maintenance of exercise behavior in older women: predictors from the social learning model. J Behav Med. 2002;25:83–97. doi:10.1023/A:1013593819121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Croft JB, Wheaton AG, Perry GS, Chapman DP, Strine TW, McKnight-Eily LR, Presley-Cantrell L. Association between perceived insufficient sleep, frequent mental distress, obesity and chronic diseases among US adults, 2009 behavioral risk factor surveillance system. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:84. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturman MC. Multiple approaches to analyzing count data in studies of individual differences: the propensity for Type I errors, illustrated with the case of absenteeism prediction. Educ Psychol Meas. 1999;59:414–30. doi:10.1177/00131649921969956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO ASSIST Working Group. The alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility. Addiction. 2002;97:1183–94. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00185.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar