The Marijuana Screening Inventory (MSI-X): Concurrent, Convergent and Discriminant Validity with Multiple Measures

REFERENCES

• National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) Report, November 26, 2004. Daily Marijuana Users. Office of Applied Statistics (OAS), RTI International, Research Triangle Park:, NC. http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• Compton W, Grant B, Colliver J, Glantz M, Stinson F. Prevalence of marijuana use disorders in the United States. JAMA 2004; 291(17):2114–2121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis M, Babor T, Roebuck M, Donaldson J. Changing the focus: The case for recognizing and treating cannabis use disorders. Addiction 2002; 97(s.1):4–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander D. A review of marijuana assessment dilemmas: Time for marijuana specific screening methods?. J. Soc. Work Practice Addict 2003a; 3(4):5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander D. A marijuana screening inventory (experimental version): Description and preliminary psychometric properties. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 2003b; 29(3):619–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander D. Clinical pilot experiences using the Marijuana Screening Inventory (MSI-X): Screening guidelines and case illustrations. J. Soc Work Practice Addict 2003c; 3(4):29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander D, Leung P. The Marijuana Screening Inventory (MSI-X): Reliability, factor structure, and scoring criteria with a clinical sample. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 2004; 30(2):321–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner H. The Drug Abuse screening test. Addict Beh 1982; 7:363–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller F, Lazowski L. The Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory (SASSI-3) Manual. 2nd ed. Springville, IN: The SASSI Institute, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan A, Kushner H, Metzger D, Peters R, Smith I, Grissom G, Pettinati H, Argeriou M. The fifth edition of the Addict Severity Index: Historical critique and normative data. J. Substance Abuse Treatment 1992; 9:199–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selzer M. The Michigan alcoholism screening test. Am J Psychiatry 1971; 127:89–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shireman L. Houston Council Alcohol and Drugs, agency client referral information, CORE statistical summary report, personal email communication, November 15, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Svanum S, McGrew J. Prospective screening of substance dependence: The advantages of directness. Addict Behav 1995; 20:205–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander D, Leung P, The DSM- IV-TR Guided Marijuana Inventory (DSM-G-MI): Reliability, factor structure, concurrent validity and screening ability with a clinical sample undergoing substance abuse evaluation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Houston, Graduate School of Social Work, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Text Revision, (DSM IV-TR). American Psychiatric Association: Washington, D.C., 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Budney A, Novy P, Hughes J. Marijuana withdrawal among adults seeking treatment for marijuana dependence. Addict 1999; 94:1311–1322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teesson M, Lynskey M, Manor B, Baillie A. The structure of cannabis dependence in the community. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002; 68:255–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner H, Goldberg A. Evidence for a drug dependence syndrome among narcotic users. British J Addict 1986; 81:479–484.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gavin D, Ross H, Skinner H. Diagnostic validity of the drug abuse screening test in the assessment of DSM-III drug disorders. British J Addict 1989; 84:301–307.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staley D, El-Guebaly N. Psychometric properties of the drug abuse screening test in a psychiatric patient population. Addict Behav 1990; 15:257–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocco K, Carey K. Psychometric properties of the drug abuse screening test in psychiatric outpatients. Psychological Assessment 1998; 10(4):408–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann B, Simpson T, Ries R, Roy-Byrne, P. Reliability and validity of screening instruments for drug and alcohol abuse in adults seeking evaluation for attention-deficit/ hyperactive disorder. American J Addictions 2000; 9:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhnke G, Vacc N, Curtis R, Coll K, Paredes D. Assessment instruments used by addictions counselors. J Addict Offender Counseling 2003; 23(2):66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Horrigan T, Piazza N. The substance abuse subtle screening inventory minimizes the need for toxicology screening of prenatal patients. J Substance Abuse Treatment 1999; 17(3):243–247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lazowski L, Miller F, Boye M, Miller G. Efficacy of the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory – 3 (SASSI-3) in identifying substance dependence disorders in clinical settings. J Personality Assessment 1998; 71(1):114–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements R. Psychometric properties of the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory – 3 (SASSI-3). J Substance Abuse Treatment 2002; 23:419–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson J. Fundamentals of Substance Abuse Practice. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thompson Learning, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Selzer M, Vinokur A, Rooijen L. A self administered Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST). J Stud Alcohol 1975; 36:117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blow FC, Brower KJ, Schulenberg JE, , et al. (1992). The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test-Geriatric Version (MAST-G): A new elderly-specific screening instrument. Alcoholism: Clinical Experimental Research 1992; 19:372.
   Google Scholar
• Laux J, Newman I. The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST): A statistical validation analysis. Measurement Evaluation in Counseling Development 2004; 36(4):209–225.
   Google Scholar
• Thurber S, Snow M, Lewis D, Hodgson J. Item characteristics of the Michigan Alcoholism screening test. J Clinical Psychology 2001; 57(1):139–144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conley T. Construct validity of the MAST and AUDIT with multiple offender drunk drivers. J Substance Abuse Treatment 2001; 20:287–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard C, Mulvey K, Gastfriend D, Swartz M. Addiction Severity Index: A field study of internal consistency and validity. J. Substance Abuse Treatment 2000; 18:129–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Assessing Client Needs Using the ASI: Resource Manual. Rockville, MD: NIDA, 1995. NIH Publication No. 95-3620.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Assessing Client Needs Using the ASI: Training Facilitator's Manual. Rockville, MD: NIDA, 1995. NIH Publication No. 95-3621.
   Google Scholar
• McClellan A, Luborsky L, Woody G, O'Brien C. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: The addiction severity index. J Nervous Mental Diseases 1980; 1268(1):263–273.
   Google Scholar
• McClellan A, Luborsky L, Cacciola J, Griffith J, Evan F, Barr H, O'Brien C. New data from the ASI: Reliability and validity in three centers. J. Nervous and Mental Disease 1985; 173(7):412–423.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodgins D, El-Guebaly N. More data on the Addict Severity Index: Reliability and validity with the mentally ill substance abuser. J Nervous Mental Disease 1992; 180:197–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argeriou M, McCarty D, Mulvey K, Daley M. Use of the addiction severity instrument with homeless substance abusers. J. Substance Abuse Treatment 1994; 11(4):359–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffelmayr B, Mavis B, Kasim R. The longitudinal stability of the addiction severity index. J Substance Abuse Treatment 1994; 11(4):373–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisner C, McLellan T, Hunkeler E. Addict severity index data from general membership and treatment samples of HMO members: One case of norming the ASI. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2000; 19:103–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alterman A, Mulvaney F, Cacciola J, Cnaan A, McDermott P, Brown L. The validity of the interviewer severity ratings in groups of ASI interviewers with varying training. Addict 2001; 96:1297–1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makela K. Studies of the reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index. Addict 2004; 99:398–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 2nd ed. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Miller F, Roberts J, Brooks M, Lazowski L. SASSI-3 Users Guide: A Quick Reference for Administration and Scoring. Bloomington: IND, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. NSDUH Series H-25, Rockville, MD. Office of Applied Studies, 2004. DHHS Publication No. SMA 04-3964.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Volume 1. Summary of National Findings. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, 2002. NHSDA Series H-17, DHHS Publication NO. SMA 02-3758.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. NSDUH Series H-22, Rockville, MD. Office of Applied Studies, 2004. DHHS Publication No. SMA 03-3836.
   Google Scholar
• Juhnke G. Substance Abuse Assessment and Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Guide for Counselors and Helping Professionals. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge, 2002.
   Google Scholar