The Impact of Publicly Funded Managed Care on Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment Outcomes

REFERENCES

• The Lewin Group. SAMHSA Managed Care Tracking System: State Profiles, 1999, on Public Sector Managed Behavioral Healthcare and Other Reforms. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Mowbray CT, Grazier KL, Holter M. Managed behavioral health care in the public sector: will it become the third shame of the States? Psychiatric Serv 2002; 53:157–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sturm R. Managed care risk contracts and substance abuse treatment. Inquiry 2000; 37:219–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galanter M, Keller DS, Dermatis H, Egelko S. The impact of managed care on substance abuse treatment: a report of the American society of addiction medicine. J Addict Dis 2000; 19:13–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty D, Argeriou M, Denmead G, Dilonardo J. Public sector managed care for substance abuse treatment: opportunities for health services research. J Beh Health Serv Res 2001; 28:143–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steenrod S, Brisson A, McCarty D, Hodgkin, D. Effects of managed care on programs and practices for the treatment of alcohol and drug dependence. Recent Developments in Alcoholism 2001; 15:51–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winters KC. Screening and Assessing Adolescents for Substance Use Disorders: Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP)–series 31. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Liu JY, Mooney DP, Meyer MM, Shorter NA. Teenage driving fatalities. J Pediatric Surg 1998; 33:1084–1088; discussion 1088–1089.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stacy AW, Newcomb MD, Bentler PM. Interactive and higher-order effects of social influences on drug use. J Health Soc Beh 1992; 33:226–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison PA, Hoffmann NG. CATOR Report: Adolescent Treatment Completers One Year Later. St. Paul, MN: Ramsey Clinic, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann NG, Kaplan RA. CATOR Report: One Year Outcome for Adolescents – Key Correlates and Benefits of Recovery. St. Paul, MN: CATOR/New Standards, Inc., 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Etheridge RM, Smith JC, Rounds-Bryant JL, Hubbard RL. Drug abuse treatment and comprehensive services for adolescents. J Adol Res 2001; 16:563–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hser YI, Grella CE, Hubbard RL, Hsieh SC, Fletcher BW, Brown BS, et al. An evaluation of drug treatments for adolescents in 4 US cities. Arch Gen Psy 2001; 58:689–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby AM, Cuellar A, Snowden LR, Orton HD. Substitution in a medicaid mental health carve-out: services and costs. J Health Care Finance 2002; 28(4):11–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pires SA, Stroul B, Armstrong ML. Health care reform tracking project: Tracking state health care reforms as they affect children and adolescents with behavioral health disorders and their families—1999 Impact Analysis. Tampa, FL: Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health, Department of Child and Family Studies, Division of State and Local Support, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Jainchill, N. Substance dependency treatment for adolescents: practice and research. Subst Use Misuse 2000; 35:2031–2060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozechowski TJ, Liddle HA. Family-based therapy for adolescent drug abuse: knowns and unknowns. Clin Child Family Psych Rev 2000; 3:269–298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winters KC. Treating adolescents with substance use disorders: an overview of practice issues and treatment outcome. Subst Abuse 1999; 20:203–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams RJ, Chang SY. A comprehensive and comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome. Clinical Psychology: Sci Practice 2000; 7:138–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan JJ, Shepard DS, Beinecke RH, Larson MJ, Cavanaugh D. Mental health/substance abuse treatment in managed care: The Massachusetts Medicaid experience. Health Affairs 1995; 14:173–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey B, Normand SL, Norton EC, Rupp A, Azeni H. Managed care and children's behavioral health services in Massachusetts. Psy Serv 2001; 52:183–188.
   Google Scholar
• Beinecke RH, Woliver R. Assessment of the Massachusetts behavioral health program year 6. Admin Pol Mental Health 2000; 28:107–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beinecke RH, Shepard DS, Tetreault J, Hodgkin D, Marckres J. Substance abuse providers' assessment of the Massachusetts behavioral health program: year 6. Admin Pol Mental Health 2001; 28:443–457.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Joe GW, Simpson DD, Broome KM. Retention and patient engagement models for different treatment modalities in DATOS. Drug Alcohol Dependence 1999; 57:113–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos RH, Moos BS. Family Environment Scale Manual. 2nd ed. San Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Achenbach TM. Manual for Youth Self-Report and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Dept. of Psychiatry, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• De Leon G, Melnick G, Kressel D, Jainchill N. Circumstances, motivation, readiness, and suitability (the CMRS scales): predicting retention in therapeutic community treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1994; 20:495–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers K, McLellan AT, Jaeger JL, Pettinati HM. The development of the comprehensive addiction severity index for adolescents (CASI-A). An interview for assessing multiple problems of adolescents. J Subst Abuse Treatment 1995; 12:181–193.
   Google Scholar
• Costa FM, Jessor R, Donovan JE. Value on health and adolescent conventionality: a construct validation of a new measure in problem-behavior theory. J Appl Soc Psych 1989; 19:841–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann NG, Harrison PA. SUDDS-IV: Substance Use Disorder Diagnostic Schedule - IV. St. Paul, MN: New Standards, Inc. 1995.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. SAS/Insight User's Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer CY. Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 1956; 12:307–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann PE, Smith MB, Hoffmann NG. Adolescent treatment. Implications for assessment, practice guidelines, and outcome management. Pediat Clin North Am 1995; 42:453–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer PE, Bray JH. Adolescent individuation and alcohol use. J Stud Alcohol Suppl 1999; 13:52–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Latimer WW, Newcomb M, Winters KC, Stinchfield RD. Adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome: The role of substance abuse problem severity, psychosocial, and treatment factors. J Consul Clin Psych 2000; 68:684–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg NZ, Rahdert E, Colliver JD, Glantz MD. Adolescent substance abuse: a review of the past 10 years. J Am Acad Child Adol Psy 1998; 37:252–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar