345
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH ARTICLES

En-gendering the material in environmental education research: Reassembling otherwise

References

  • Alaimo, S. (2011). New materialisms, old humanisms, or, following the submersible. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 19(4), 280–284.
  • Alvermann, D. E. (2000). Research libraries, literacies and lives: A rhizoanalysis. In E. St. Pierre & W. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 114–129). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Barrett, M. J. (2005). Making (some) sense of feminist poststructuralism in environmental education research and practice. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 10, 79–93.
  • Barrett, M. J., Harmin, M., Maracle, B., Patterson, M., Thomson, C., Flowers, M., & Bors, K. (2017). Shifting relations with the more-than-human: Six threshold concepts for transformative sustainability learning. Environmental Education Research, 23, 131–143. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1121378
  • Braidotti, R. (2003). Becoming woman: Or sexual difference revisited. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(3), 43–64.
  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender troubles. London, England: Routledge.
  • Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. London, England: Routledge.
  • Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. London, England: Routledge.
  • Butler, J. (1999). Revisiting bodies and pleasures. Theory, Culture & Society, 16(2), 11–20.
  • Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Butler, J. (2006). Response to special issue—Troubling identities: Reflections on Judith Butler's philosophy for the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(4), 529–534.
  • Carrier, S. J. (2009). Environmental education in the schoolyard: Learning styles and gender. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(3), 2–12.
  • Chadderton, C. (2013). Towards a research framework for race in education: Critical race theory and Judith Butler. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(1), 39–55.
  • Childers, S. (2013). The materiality of fieldwork: An ontology of feminist becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(5), 599–609.
  • Childers, S., Rhee, J., & Daza, S. (2013). Promiscuous (use of) feminist methodologies: The dirty theory and messy practice of educational research beyond gender. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(5), 507–523.
  • Davies, B. (1993). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. New York, NY: Hampton Press.
  • Davies, B. (2013). A feminist poststructural approach to environmental education research. In R. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon & A. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 480–486). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Davies, B., Browne, J., Gannon, S., Hopkins, L., McCann, H., & Wihlborg, M. (2006). Constituting the feminist subject in poststructuralist discourse. Feminism & Psychology, 16(1), 87–103.
  • Delamont, S., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Fighting familiarity: Essays on education and ethnography. New York, NY: Hampton Press.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • DePalma, R., & Atkinson, E. (2007). Exploring gender identity: Queering heteronormativity. International Journal of Equity and Innovation in Early Childhood, 5(2), 64–82.
  • Fransson, N., & Garling, T. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 369–382.
  • Gavey, N. (1999). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis. In M. Gergen & S. Davis (Eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender: A reader (pp. 49–64). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gough, A. (1994). Fathoming the fathers in environmental education: A feminist poststructuralist analysis ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
  • Gough, A. (1999). Recognizing women in environmental education pedagogy and research: Towards an ecofeminist poststructural perspective. Environmental Education Research, 5(2), 143–161.
  • Gough, A. (2013). Researching differently: Generating a gender agenda for research in environmental education. In R. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon & A. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 33–44). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gough, A., & Whitehouse, H. (2003). The “nature” of environmental education research from a feminist poststructuralist standpoint. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 8, 31–43.
  • Grumet, M., & McCoy, K. (2000). Feminism and education. In B. Moon, M. Ben-Peretz, & S. Brown (Eds.), Routledge international companion to education (pp. 426–440). London, England: Routledge.
  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). London, England: Tavistock Publications.
  • Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Harris, A. (Ed.) (2004). All about the girl: Culture, power and identity. London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Hart, P., & Hart, C. (2014). It's not that simple anymore: Engaging the politics of culture and identity within Environmental Education/Education for Sustainable Development (EE/ESD). In J. C.-K. Lee & R. Efird (Eds.), Schooling for sustainable development across the Pacific (pp. 37–57). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Hart, P., & Nolan, K. (1999). A critical analysis of research in environmental education. Studies in Science Education, 34, 1–69.
  • Haywood, C. (2008). Genders and sexualities: Exploring the concept of limits of contemporary educational research. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 18(1), 1–14.
  • Hekman, S. (2008). Feminist methodology. In W. Outhwaite & S. Turner, (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social science methodology (pp. 534–546). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hird, M. J. (2009). Feminist engagements with matter. Feminist Studies, 35(2), 329–345.
  • Hughes, C. (2002). Key concepts in feminist theory and research. London, England: Sage.
  • Hughes, C., & Lury, C. (2013). Re-turning feminist methodologies: From a social to an ecological epistemology. Gender and Education, 25(6), 786–799.
  • Jackson, A. (2013). Making matter making us: Thinking with Grosz to find freedom in new feminist materialisms. Gender and Education, 25(6), 769–775.
  • Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York: Routledge.
  • Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Problematizing methodological simplicity in qualitative research: Editors’ introduction. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(9), 728–731.
  • Lather, P. (1988). Feminist perspectives on empowering research methodologies. Women's Studies International Forum, 11, 569–581.
  • Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633.
  • MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.
  • Mazzei, L. (2013). Materialist mappings of knowing in being: Researchers constituted in the production of knowledge. Gender and Education, 25(6), 776–785.
  • McCoy, K. (2012). Towards a methodology of encounters: Opening to complexity in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(9), 762–772.
  • McKenzie, M. (2004). The “willful contradiction” of poststructural socio-ecological education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 177–190.
  • McNeil, M. (2010). Post-millenial feminist theory: Encounters with humanism, materialism, critique, nature, biology and Darwin. Journal for Cultural Research, 14(4), 427–437.
  • McRobbie, A. (2004). Post-feminism and popular culture. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), 255–264. doi:10.1080/1468077042000309937.
  • McRobbie, A. (2007). Illegible rage: Reflections on young women's postfeminist disorders. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/publicEvents/pdf/20070125_McRobbie.pdf.
  • McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. London, England: Sage.
  • Probyn, E. (2003). The spatial imperative of subjectivity. In K. Anderson, M. Domosh, S. Pile, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Handbook of cultural geography (p. 290–299). London, England: Sage.
  • Renold, E. (2005). Girls, boys and junior sexualities. London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Renold, E. (2007). Primary school “studs”: (De)constructing young boys’ heterosexual masculinities. Men and Masculinities, 9(3), 275–298.
  • Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2008). Regulation and rupture: Mapping tween and teenage girls’ resistance to the heterosexual matrix. Feminist Theory, 9(3), 313–338.
  • Roberts, N., & Suran, A. (2010). Effects of an environmental education program on the environmental orientations of children from different gender, age and ethnic groups. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 28(3), 95–113.
  • Russell, C., & Fawcett, L. (2013). Moving margins in environmental education. In R. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon & A. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 360–374). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Somerville, M. (2004). Tracing bodylines: The body in feminist poststructural research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(1), 47–63.
  • St. Pierre, E. (2000a). Nomadic inquiry in the smooth spaces of the field: A preface. In E. St. Pierre & W. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 258–284). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • St. Pierre, E. (2000b). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 477–515.
  • St. Pierre, E. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611–625). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Stern, P. (1993). Value orientations, gender and environmental concern. Environment and Behaviour, 25(5), 322–348.
  • Tamboukou, M. (2004). Nomadic trajectories in the unfolding of the self. Spaces of Identity, 4(2). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10552/406
  • Tamboukou, M. (2008). Re-imagining the narratable subject. Qualitative Research, 8(3), 283–292. Reprinted in C. Hughes (Ed.), (2013). Researching gender. London, England: Sage.
  • Taylor, C., & Ivinson, G. (2013). Material feminisms: New directions for education. Gender and Education, 25(6), 665–670.
  • Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London, England: Verso.
  • Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
  • Youdell, D. (2000). Schooling identities: An ethnography of the constitution of pupil identities inside school ( Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of London, London, England.
  • Youdell, D. (2004). Wounds and reinscriptions: Schools, sexualities and performative subjects. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25(4), 477–493.
  • Zelezny, L., Chua, P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443–457.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.