New vintages and new bottles: The “Nature” of environmental education from new material feminist and ecofeminist viewpoints

References

• Adams, C., & Gruen, L. (2014). Groundwork. In C. Adams & L. Gruen (Eds.), Ecofeminism: Feminist intersections with other animals and the earth (pp. 7–36). New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Adsit-Morris, C., & Gough, N. (2017). It takes more than two to (multispecies) tango: Queering gender texts in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(1), 67–78. doi:10.1080/00958964.2016.1249330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S. (1994). Cyborg and ecofeminist interventions: Challenges for an environmental feminism. Feminist Studies, 20(1), 133–152.
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S. (2008). Trans-corporeal feminisms and the ethical space of nature. In S. Alaimo & S. J. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 237–264). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. (2008). Introduction: Emerging models of materiality in feminist theory. In S. Alaimo & S. J. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 1–19). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anand, A. (1983). Saving trees, saving lives: Third world women and the issue of survival. In L. Caldecott & S. Leland (Eds.), Reclaim the earth: Women speak out for life on Earth (pp. 182–188). London, England: Women's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum and Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2017a). The Australian Curriculum. F-10 curriculum. General Capabilities. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities/
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum and Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2017b). The Australian Curriculum. F-10 curriculum. Cross curriculum priorities. Sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/cross-curriculum-priorities/sustainability/
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (1998). Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences, 10(2), 87–128.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London, England: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M. J. (2005). Making (some) sense of feminist poststructuralism in environmental education research and practice. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 10, 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., & Russell, C. (2000). Beyond human, beyond words: Anthropocentrism, critical pedagogy, and the poststructuralist turn. Canadian Journal of Education, 25(3), 188–203. doi:10.2307/1585953.
   Google Scholar
• Blaise, M., Hamm, C., & Iorio, J. M. (2017). Modest witness(ing) and lively stories: Paying attention to matters of concern in early childhood. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 25(1), 31–42. doi:10.1080/14681366.2016.1208265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldecott, L., & Leland, S. (Eds.). (1983). Reclaim the earth: Women speak out for life on Earth. London, England: Women's Press.
   Google Scholar
• d'Eaubonne, F. (1974). Le Feminisme ou la mort [Feminisim or death]. Paris, France: Pierre Horay.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emmerman, K. (2014). Inter-animal moral conflicts and moral repair: A contexualised ecofeminist approach in action. In C. J. Adams & L. Gruen (Eds.). Ecofeminism: Feminist interactions with other animals and the earth (pp. 225–239). New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, L. (2000). Ethical imagining: Ecofeminist possibilities and environmental learning. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 134–149.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, L. (2009). Feral sociality and (un)natural histories: On nomadic ethics and embodied learning. In M. McKenzie, P. Hart, H. Bai, & B. Jickling (Eds.), Fields of green: Re-storying culture, environment and education (pp. 227–237). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, L. (2013). Three degrees of separation: Accounting for naturecultures in environmental education research. In R. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 409–417). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203813331.ch39
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, L. (2014). Kinship imaginaries: Children's stories of wild friendships, fear, and freedom. In G. Marvin & S. McHugh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human-animal studies (pp. 259–274). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, L., Bell, A. C., & Russell, C. L. (2002). Guiding our environmental praxis: Teaching for social and environmental justice. In W. Filho (Ed.), Teaching sustainability at universities: Towards curriculum greening (pp. 223–238). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, K. (2000). Learning, magic, and politics: Integrating ecofeminist spirituality into environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5(1), 200–212.
   Google Scholar
• Gaard, G. (2011). Ecofeminism revisited: Rejecting essentialism and re-placing species in a material feminist environmentalism. Feminist Formations, 23(2), 26–53. doi:10.1353/ff.2011.0017.
   Google Scholar
• Gaard, G. (2014). Toward new eco-masculinities, eco-genders and eco-sexualities. In C. J. Adams & L. Gruen (Eds.), Ecofeminism: Feminist interactions with other animals and the Earth (pp. 225–239). New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Gaard, G. (2015). Ecofeminism and climate change. Women's Studies International Forum, 49, 20–33. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2015.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, A. (1997). Education and the environment: Policy, trends and the problems of marginalisation. Australian Education Review Series No.39. Melbourne, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, A. (1999a). Recognising women in environmental education pedagogy and research: Toward an ecofeminist poststructuralist perspective. Environmental Education Research, 5(2), 143–161. doi:10.1080/1350462990050202.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, A. (1999b). The power and promise of feminist research in environmental education. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 19, 28–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, A. (2003). Embodying a mine site: Enacting cyborg curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 19, 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, A. (2004a). Blurring boundaries: Embodying cyborg subjectivity and methodology. In H. Piper & I. Stronach (Eds.) Educational research: Difference and diversity (pp. 113–127). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, A. (2004b). The contribution of ecofeminist perspectives to sustainability in higher education. In P. Corcoran & A. Wals (Eds.), Higher education and the challenge of sustainability (pp. 149–161). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/0-306-48515-X_12
   Google Scholar
• Gough, A. (2005). Body/mine: A chaos narrative of cyborg subjectivities and liminal experiences. Women's Studies, 34(3–4), 249–264. doi:10.1080/00497870590964147.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, A. (2013). Researching differently: Generating a gender agenda for research in environmental education. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 375–383). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203813331.ch35
   Google Scholar
• Gough, A., & Whitehouse, H. (2003). The “nature” of environmental education from a feminist poststructuralist viewpoint. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 8, 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, N., Gough, A., Appelbaum, P., Appelbaum, S., Aswell Doll, M., & Sellers, W. (2003). Tales from Camp Wilde: Queer(y)ing environmental education research. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 8, 44–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hallen, P. (2000). Ecofeminism goes bush. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 150–166.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–600. doi:10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. NewYork, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London, UK: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2008). Otherwordly conversation, terrain topics, local terms. In S. Alaimo & S. J. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 157–187). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chtulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822373780
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. doi:10.1080/00958964.2016.1249328
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2017). En-gendering the material in environmental education research: Reassembling otherwise. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(1), 46–55. doi:10.1080/00958964.2016.1249328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvester, L., & Blenkinsop, S. (2011). Environmental education and ecofeminist pedagogy: Bridging the environmental and the social. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 15, 120–134.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kheel, M. (2008). Nature ethics: An ecofeminist perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism versus the climate. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, H. (2015). Thinking like a climate. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 16(1), 91–109. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2015.1022565.
   Google Scholar
• Kolbert, E. (2014). The sixth extinction. An unnatural history. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Korteweg, L., & Russell, C. (2012). Decolonizing + Indigenizing = Moving environmental education towards reconciliation. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 17, 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lahar, S. (1991). Ecofeminist theory and grassroots politics. Hypatia, 6(1), 28–45. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00207.x.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H. L. (2007). Ecofeminism as a pedagogical project: Women, nature, and education. Educational Theory, 57(3), 351–368. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2007.00262.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T. (2017). A feminist posthumanist political ecology of education for theorizing human-animal relations/relationships. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 111–130. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1135419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T., & Semenko, K. (2017). Toward a feminist ethic of self-care for environmental educators. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(1), 18–25. doi:10.1080/00958964.2016.1249324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowan-Trudeau, G. (2013). Indigenous environmental education research in North America: A brief review. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 404–408). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203813331.ch38
   Google Scholar
• Maina-Okori, N. M., Koushik, J. R., & Wilson, A. (2017, online). Reimagining intersectionality in environmental and sustainability education: A critical literature review. The Journal of Environmental Education. doi:10.1080/00958964.2017.1364215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, K. (2016). Reconsidering children's encounters with nature and place using posthumanism. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1), 42–56.
   Google Scholar
• Martusewicz, R. (2013). Toward an anti-centric ecological culture: Bringing a critical eco-feminist analysis to ecojustice education. In A. Kulnieks, D. Longboat, & K. Young (Eds.), Contemporary studies in environmental and Indigenous pedagogies: A curricula of stories and place (pp. 259–272). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-293-8_14
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, C. (1992). Radical ecology: The search for a livable world. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, C. (1995). Earthcare: Women and the environment. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, C. (2003). Reinventing Eden: The fate of nature in Western culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, C. (2016). Autonomous nature: Problems of prediction and control from ancient times to the scientific revolution. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mies, M., & Shiva, V. (1993). Ecofeminism. London, UK: ZEd Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nxumalo, F. (2015). Forest stories: Restorying encounters with “natural” places in early childhood education. In V. Pacini-Ketchabaw & A. Taylor (Eds.), Unsettling the colonial places and spaces of early childhood education (pp. 21–42). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nxumalo, F., & Cedillo, S. (2017). Decolonizing “place” in early childhood studies: Thinking with Indigenous onto-epistemologies and black feminist geographies. Global Studies of Childhood, 7(2), 99–112. doi:10.1177/2043610617703831.
   Google Scholar
• Nxumalo, F., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2017, online). “Staying with the trouble” in child-insect-educator common worlds. Environmental Education Research. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1325447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Nxumalo, F. (2015). Unruly raccoons and troubled educators: Nature/culture divides in a childcare centre. Environmental Humanities, 7, 151–168. doi:10.1215/22011919-3616380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. (2016). Developing ecofeminist corporeality: Writing the body as activist poetics. In M. Phillips & N. Rumens (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on ecofeminism (pp. 57–75). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, M., & Rumens, N. (2016a). Introducing contemporary ecofeminism. In M. Phillips & N. Rumens (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on ecofeminism (pp. 1–16). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, M., & Rumens, N. (Eds.). (2016b). Contemporary perspectives on ecofeminism. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Piersol, L., & Timmerman, N. (2017). Reimagining environmental education within academia: Storytelling and dialogue as lived ecofeminist politics. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(1), 10–17. doi:10.1080/00958964.2016.1249329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C. (2005). “Whoever does not write is written”: The role of “nature” in post-post approaches to environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 11(5), 433–443. doi:10.1080/13504620500169569.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C. (2009). Living and learning on the edge: Class, race, gender, animals and the environment in a university community outreach program. Our Schools/Our Selves, 19(1), 109–112.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C., & Bell, A. (1996). A politicized ethic of care: Environmental education from an ecofeminist perspective. In K. Warren (Ed.), Women's voices in experiential education (pp. 172–181). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C., & Semenko, K. (2016). We take “cow” as a compliment: Fattening humane, environmental, and social justice education. In E. Cameron & C. Russell (Eds.), The fat pedagogy reader: Challenging weight-based oppression through critical education (pp. 211–220). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J. S. (1990). The evolution of an ecofeminist. In I. Diamond & G. F. Orenstein, (Eds.), Reweaving the world: The emergence of ecofeminism (pp. 223–230). San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, E. G. (1999). Exploring children's picture books through ecofeminist literacy. In G. Smith & D. Williams (Eds.), Ecological education in action: On weaving education and the environment (pp. 103–116). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seager, J. (1993). Earth follies: Coming to feminist terms with the global environmental crisis. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sonu, D., & Snaza, N. (2015). The fragility of ecological pedagogy: Elementary social studies standards and possibilities of new materialism. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 12(3), 258–277. doi:10.1080/15505170.2015.1103671
   Google Scholar
• Soper, K. (1995). What is nature? Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, M. E., & Nichols, S. E. (2010). Exploring environmental education through ecofeminism: Narratives of embodiment of science. In A. Bodzin, B. Shine Klein, & S. Weaver (Eds.), The inclusion of environmental education in science teacher education (pp. 255–266). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9222-9_17
   Google Scholar
• Sturgeon, N. (2009). Environmentalism in popular culture: Gender, race, sexuality, and the politics of the natural. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 477–515.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., Blaise, M., & Giugni, M. (2013). Haraway's “bag lady story-telling”: Relocating childhood and learning within a “post-human landscape.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(1), 48–62. doi:10.1080/01596306.2012.698863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Toward a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture, and Society, 23(4), 507–529. doi:10.1080/14681366.2015.1039050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. (in press). Diffracting the curriculum: Putting “new” material feminist theory to work to reconfigure knowledge-making practices in undergraduate higher education. In K. Scantlebury, C. A. Taylor, & A. Lund (Eds.), Turning feminist theory into practice: Enacting material change in education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Retrieved from http://sites.udel.edu/kscantle/books/
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2006). Back to nature? Resurrecting ecofeminism after poststructuralist and third-wave feminisms. Isis, 97(3), 505–512. doi:10.1086/508080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., McKenzie, M., & McCoy, K. (2014). Land education: Indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspectives on place and environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.877708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twine, R. (2010). Intersectional disgust? Animals and (eco)feminism. Feminism & Psychology, 20(3), 397–406. doi:10.1177/0959353510368284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1972). Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. Retrieved from www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=97&articleid=1503
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Annex 1 in report of the United Nations conference on environment and development. Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1993). Agenda 21: Earth Summit: The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio. New York, NY: United Nations. Retrieved from sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2012). The future we want: Outcomes document adopted at Rio + 20. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: UNited Nations. Retrieved from www.uncsd2012.org/content/documents/727The%20Future%20We%20Want%2019%20June%201230pm.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on September25, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang = E
   Google Scholar
• Warren, K. J. (1987). Feminism and ecology: Making connections. Environmental Ethics, 9(1), 3–20. doi:10.5840/enviroethics19879113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, K. J. (Ed.) (1994). Ecological feminism. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, K. J., & Cheney, J. (1991). Ecological feminism and ecosystem ecology. Hypatia, 6(1), 179–197. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00216.x.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, H. (2000). Talking up country: A study of the discursive production of environmental meanings in tropical Australia (Doctoral dissertation). James Cook University. Cairns, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, H. (2011). Talking up country: Language, natureculture and interculture in Australian environmental education research. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 27(1), 56–67. doi:10.1017/S0814062600000070.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, H., Watkin-Lui, F., Sellwood, J., Barrett, M. J., & Chigeza, P. (2014). Sea country: Navigating Indigenous and colonial ontologies in Australian environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 56–69. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.852655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worsham, L., & Olson, G. (2008). Plugged in: Technology, rhetoric, and culture in a posthuman age. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar