Role of environmental interaction in interdisciplinary thinking: from knowledge resources perspectives

References

• Alagona, P. S., & Simon, G. L. (2010). The role of field study in humanistic and interdisciplinary environmental education. Journal of Experiential Education, 32(3), 191–206.
   Google Scholar
• Ardoin, N. M. (2006). Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of place: Lessons for environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 11(1), 112–126.
   Google Scholar
• Boréus, K., & Bergström, G. (2017). Analyzing text and discourse: Eight approaches for the social sciences. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., & Fraser, D. (2009). Reevaluating risk and exploring educational alternatives. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 9(1), 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Bunting, C. J. (2006). Interdisciplinary teaching through outdoor education. New York, NY: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. I., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implication for design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, L., & Crimmel, H. (Eds.). (2008). Teaching about place: Learning from the land. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, B., Bobilya, A. J., Kalisch, K. R., & McAvoy, L. H. (2014). Autonomous student experiences in outdoor and adventure education. Journal of Experiential Education, 37(1), 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, D. (2000). Cognitive and affective learning in outdoor education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/12600.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external representation tools. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(3), 405–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1981). Ethnographic research and the problem of data reduction. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 12(1), 51–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2003). Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 53–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2010). Productive use of learning resources in an online problem-based learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 84–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. K. (2011). A complexity-grounded model for the emergence of convergence in CSCL groups. In Analyzing interactions in CSCL (pp. 3–23). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kerawalla, L., Littleton, K., Scanlon, E., Collins, T., Gaved, M., Mulholland, P., … Blake, C. (2012). Doing geography: A multimodal analysis of students’ situated improvisational interpretation during fieldtrips. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(2), 78–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P., & Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, M., & Barton, C. A. (2006). Science learning and a sense of place in an urban middle school. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(1), 107–142.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.
   Google Scholar
• Maulucci, M. R., & Brotman, J. S. (2010). Teaching science in the city: Exploring linkages between teacher learning and student learning across formal and informal contexts. The New Educator, 6(3–4), 196–211.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, T., & Waters, J. (2007). Learning in the outdoor environment: A missed opportunity?. Early Years, 27(3), 255–265.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, R. V. (2007). Social studies around the blacksmith’s forge: Interdisciplinary teaching and learning. The Social Studies, 98(3), 99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Orion, N. (1993). A model for the development and implementation of field trips as an integral part of the science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 93(6), 325–331.
   Google Scholar
• Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachler, N. (2009). Research methods in mobile and informal learning: Some issues. In G. Vavoula, N. Pachler, & A. Kukulska-Hulme (Eds), Researching mobile learning: Framework, tools and research designs (pp. 1–15). Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, S. (1986). Redefining outdoor education: A matter of many relationships. The Journal of Environmental Education, 17(3), 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rahm, I. (2002). Emergent learning opportunities in an inner-city youth gardening program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 164–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. London, UK: Field Studies Council.
   Google Scholar
• Sibthorp, J. (2003). Learning transferable skills through adventure education: The role of an authentic process. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 3(2), 145–157.
   Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46(1), 29–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suthers, D. D., Dwyer, N., Medina, R., & Vatrapu, R. (2010). A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 5–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. (2017). Learning along lines: Locative literacies for reading and writing the city. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(4), 533–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Besselaar, P., & Heimeriks, G. (2001). Disciplinary, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary: Concepts and indicators. In M. Davis & C. S. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics–ISSI2001, (pp. 705–716). Sydney, Australia: University of New South-Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Singapore: SAGE.
   Google Scholar