455
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Cosmopolitical encounters in environmental education: Becoming-ecological in the intertidal zones of Bundjalung National Park

ORCID Icon

References

  • Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Indiana University Press.
  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
  • Boileau, E., & Russell, C. (2020). Insect and human flourishing in early childhood education: Learning and crawling together. In A. Cutter-Mackenzie, K. Malone, & E. Barratt Hacking (Eds.), Research handbook on childhoodnature: Assemblages of childhood and nature. (pp. 1323–1338). Springer.
  • Bignall, S., & Braidotti, R. (2018). Posthuman systems. In Braidotti, R. & Bignall, S. (Eds.). Posthuman ecologies: complexity and process after Deleuze (pp. 1-16). Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Cajete, G. (2006). Western science and the loss of natural creativity. In D. T. Jacobs (Ed.), Unlearning the language of conquest (pp. 247–259).University of Texas Press.
  • Colebrook, C. (2014). Death of the PostHuman: Essays on extinction (Vol. 1). Open Humanities Press.
  • Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency and politics (pp. 1–43). Duke University Press.
  • de La Bellacasa, M. P. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301
  • de la Cadena, M. (2010). Indigenous cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual reflections beyond “politics. Cultural Anthropology, 25(2), 334–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01061.x
  • Deleuze, G. (1992). Ethology: Spinoza and us. In J. Crary & S. Kwinter (Eds.), Zone 6: Incorporations. (pp. 625–633). Zone Books.
  • Despret, V. (2013a). Responding bodies and partial affinities in human–animal worlds. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(7–8), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413496852
  • Despret, V. (2013b). From secret agents to interagency. History and Theory, 52(4), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10686
  • Gleason, T. (2017). Science education and the nature of nature: Bruno Latour’s ontological politics. Educational Studies, 53(6), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1369083
  • Guattari, F. (1989/2008). The three ecologies (I. Pindar & P. Sutton, Trans.). Continuum.
  • Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In Grossberg, L., Nelson, C., & Treichler, P. (Eds.), Cultural studies, (pp. 295–337).
  • Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Cthulucene. Duke University Press.
  • Harding, S. (2009). Postcolonial and feminist philosophies of science and technology: Convergences and dissonances. Postcolonial Studies, 12(4), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790903350658
  • Harvester, L., & Blenkinsop, S. (2010). Environmental education and ecofeminist pedagogy: Bridging the environmental and the social. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 15, 120–134.
  • Hohti, R., & Tammi, T. (2019). The greenhouse effect: Multispecies childhood and non-innocent relations of care. Childhood, 26(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568219826263
  • Hörl, E. (2017). Introduction to general ecology: The ecologisation of thinking. In E. Hörl & J. E. Burton (Eds.), General ecology: The new ecological paradigm (pp. 1–75). Bloomsbury.
  • Le Grange, L. (2018). Spinoza, deep ecology and education informed by a (post) human sensibility. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(9), 878–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1384723
  • Lloro-Bidart, T. (2015). A political ecology of education in/for the Anthropocene. Environment and Society, 6(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2015.060108
  • Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge.
  • Lloro-Bidart, T. (2018). Cultivating affects: A feminist posthumanist analysis of invertebrate and human performativity in an urban community garden. Emotion, Space, and Society, 27, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2018.02.006
  • MacLure, M. (2013). The wonder of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487863
  • Malone, K. (2015). Posthumanist approaches to theorising children’s human-nature relations. In K. Nairn, P. Kraftl & T. Skelton (Eds.), Space, place and environment (pp. 1–22). Springer.
  • Malone, K. (2016). Theorizing a child–dog encounter in the slums of La Paz using post-humanistic approaches in order to disrupt universalisms in current ‘child in nature’debates. Children’s Geographies, 14(4), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2015.1077369
  • Manning, E. (2013). Always more than one: Individuation’s dance. Duke University Press.
  • Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Margulis, L. (1999). The symbiotic planet: A new look at evolution. Phoenix.
  • McCoy, K., Tuck, I., & McKenzie, M. (2018). Rethinking pedagogies of place from Indigenous, postcolonial, and decolonizing perspectives. Routledge.
  • Mcphie, J., & Clarke, D. A. G. (2015). A walk in the park: Considering practice for outdoor environmental education through an immanent take on the material turn. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(4), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1069250
  • Merriam-Webster. (2019). Ecology. Retrieved 14 April, 2019 from www.merriam-webster.com.
  • Mies, M., & Shiva, V. (1993). Ecofeminism. Zed Books.
  • Oyama, S. (2009). Friends, neighbors, and boundaries. Ecological Psychology, 21(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407410902877173
  • Payne, P. G. (2016). What next? Post-critical materialisms in environmental education: Post-critical materialisms in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1127201
  • Piotrowski, M. (2019). An atmosphere, an air, a life’: Deleuze, elemental media, and more-than-human environmental subjectification and education. Environmental Education Research, 1–12.
  • Plumwood, V. (1986). Ecofeminism: An overview and discussion of positions and arguments. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64(sup1), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.1986.9755430
  • Rautio, P., Hohti, R., Leinonen, R. M., & Tammi, T. (2017). Reconfiguring urban environmental education with ‘shitgull’ and a ‘shop. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1379–1390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1325446
  • Robbert, A., & Mickey, S. (2013). Cosmopolitics: An ongoing question. Paper delivered at The Center for Process Studies. Claremont, CA. Political Theory and Entanglement: Politics at the Overlap of Race, Class, and Gender. Retrieved May 25, 2019, from https://knowledgeecology.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/claremont_cosmopolitics.pdf.
  • Rose, D. B. (2002). Love and reconciliation in the forest: A study in decolonisation. Hawke Institute, University of South Australia.
  • Rotas, N. (2015). Ecologies of praxis: Teaching and learning against the obvious. In N. Snaza & J. Weaver (Eds.), Posthumanism and educational research (pp. 91–104). Routledge.
  • Rousell, D. (2016). Dwelling in the Anthropocene: Re-imagining university learning environments in response to social and ecological change. The Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32(2), 1–20.
  • Rousell, D. (2017). Mapping the data event: A posthumanist approach to art|education|research in a regional university. In L. Knight & A. Cutcher (eds.), Arts, research, education: connections and directions (pp. 203–220). Springer International Publishing.
  • Rousell, D. (2018). Doing little justices: Speculative propositions for an immanent environmental ethics. Environmental Education Research, 26(9–10), 1391–1405.
  • Rousell, D. (2019). Inhuman forms of life: On art as a problem for post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(7), 887–908.
  • Rousell, D. & Cutter-Mackenzie, A. (2018). The parental milieu: Biosocial connections with animals, technologies and the Earth. Journal of Environmental Education, 50(2), 84–96.
  • Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. (2015). Introduction: Education and the posthumanist turn. In N. Snaza, & J. Weaver (Eds.), Posthumanism and educational research (pp. 1–16). Routledge.
  • Stengers, I. (1997). Power and invention: Situating science (P. Bains, Trans). University of Minnesota Press.
  • Stengers, I. (2005a). Introductory notes on an ecology of practices. Cultural Studies Review, 11(1), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v11i1.3459
  • Stengers, I. (2005b). The cosmopolitical proposal. In B. Latour & Weibel, P. (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 994–1002). MIT Press.
  • Stengers, I. (2010). Cosmopolitics I (R. Bononno, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
  • Stengers, I. (2011). Thinking with Whitehead: A free and wild creation of concepts. Harvard University Press.
  • Stengers, I. (2015). In catastrophic times: Resisting the coming barbarism. Open Humanities Press.
  • Stengers, I. (2018). Another science is possible: A manifesto for slow science (S. Muecke Trans.). Polity Press.
  • TallBear, K. (2017). Beyond the life/not life binary: A feminist-indigenous reading of cryopreservation, interspecies thinking and the new materialisms. In J. Radin & E. Kowal (Eds.), Cryopolitics: Frozen life in a melting world (pp. 179–202). MIT Press.
  • Tammi, T. (2019). What if schools were lively more-than-human agencements all along? Troubling environmental education with moldschools. Environmental Education Research, 26(9–10), 1325–1340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10.1080/13504622.2019.1584881
  • Taylor, A. (2017). Beyond stewardship: Common world pedagogies for the Anthropocene. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1448–1461. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1325452
  • Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 507–529.
  • Todd, Z. (2015). Indigenizing the Anthropocene. In H. Davis & E. Turpin (Eds.), Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among aesthetics, politics, environments and epistemologies (pp. 241–254). Open Humanities Press.
  • Weinstein, J., & Colebrook, C. (2016). Introduction: Critical life studies and the problems of inhuman rites and posthumous life. In J. Weinstein & C. Colebrook (Eds.), Posthumous Life: Theorising beyond the posthuman (pp. ix–xxvii). Columbia University Press.
  • West-Eberhard, M. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press.
  • Whatmore, S., (2003). Generating materials. In M. Pryke, G. Rose, & S. J. Whatmore (Eds.), Using social theory: Thinking through research (pp. 89–104). SAGE Publications.
  • Whitehead, A. N. (1964). The concept of nature. Cambridge University Press.
  • Whitehead, A. N. (1968). Modes of thought. The Free Press.
  • Whitehead, A. N. (2004). The concept of nature. Prometheus Press.
  • Yusoff, K. (2019). A billion black Anthropocenes or none. University of Minnesota Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.