Conservation behavior can defy traditional predictors

References

• Axelrod, L. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1993). Responding to environmental concerns: What factors guide individual action?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80147-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balundė, A., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2019). The relationship between People’s Environmental Considerations and Pro-environmental Behavior in Lithuania . Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergquist, M., Nilsson, A., & Schultz, W. P. (2019). A meta-analysis of field-experiments using social norms to promote pro-environmental behaviors. Global Environmental Change, 59, 101941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloevncha.2019.101941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankenberg, A., Alhusen, H. (2019). On the determinants of pro-environmental behavior: A literature review and guide for the empirical economist, cege Discussion Papers, No. 350, University of Göttingen, Center for European, Governance, and Economic Development Research (cege), Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. Environmental Education Research, 4(4), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462980040402
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. C.-H., & Monroe, M. C. (2012). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), 31–49. First published Nov 7, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510385082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In S. Clayton, & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment. The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–65). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Young, R. (1993). Changing behavior and making it stick: The conceptualization and management of conservation behavior. Environment and Behavior, 25(3), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593253003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defiebre, C. (2016). New study calculates Indian River Lagoon’s annual economic impact at $7.64 billion. TC Palm. http://archive.tcpalm.com/news/indian-river-lagoon/health/new-study-calculates-indian-river-lagoons-annual-economic-impact-at-764-billion-39041e1d-2a0b-72ff-e-390015831.html
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S., Eds. (2008). The landscape of qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. E., Otto, S., & Kaiser, F. G. (2018). Childhood origins of young adult environmental behavior. Psychol Sci, 29(5), 679–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1978). On the predictive validity of attitudes: The roles of direct experience. Journal of Personality, 46(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00177.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz, C. M., & Mayer, F. S. (2014). The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatersleben, B., Murtagh, N., & Abrahamse, W. (2014). Values, identity and pro-environmental behavior. Contemporary Social Science, 9(4), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2012.682086
   Google Scholar
• Grajal, A., Luebke, J. F., Kelly, L.-A D., Matiasek, J., Clayton, S., Karazsia, B. T., Saunders, C. D., Goldman, S. R., Mann, M. E., & Stanoss, R. (2017). The complex relationship between personal sense of connection to animals and self-reported proenvironmental behaviors by zoo visitors. Conservation Biology : The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 31(2), 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hug, J. (1977). Two Hats from a Report on the North American Regional Seminar on Environmental Educator: A confrontation with the issues: Environmental Education for the Real World. Columbus OH: SMEAC Information Center. Reprinted in Engleson, D. C. 1985. A Guide to Curriculum Planning in Environmental Education. Madison WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Indian River Lagoon National Estuarine Program (IRLNEP). (2008). The Indian River Lagoon Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan Update 2008. Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program. Palm Bay, FL. ccmp_update_2008_final.pdf 120 pages
   Google Scholar
• Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
   Google Scholar
• Lalande, K. M., & Bonanno, G. A. (2011). Retrospective memory bias for the frequency of potentially traumatic events: A prospective study. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 3(2), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mappin, M. J., & Johnson, E. A. (2005). Changing perspectives of ecology and education in environmental education. in Johnson, E. & M. Mappin (eds)., Environmental Education and Advocacy (pp. 1–27). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, D. (2014). The ecology of democracy. Kettering Foundation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie-Mohr, D., & Schultz, P. W. (2014). Choosing Effective Behavior Change Tools. Social Marketing Quarterly, 20(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500413519257
   Google Scholar
• Millar, M. G., & Millar, K. U. (1996). The effects of direct and indirect experience on affective and cognitive responses and the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(6), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.0025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, M. C. (2003). Two avenues for encouraging conservation behaviors. Human Ecology Review, 10(2), 113–125.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, M. C., Andrews, E., & Biedenweg, K. (2008). A framework for environmental education strategies. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 6(3-4), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15330150801944416
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, S., & Pensini, P. (2017). Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behavior. Global Environmental Change, 47, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prévot, A.-C., Clayton, S., & Mathevet, R. (2018). The relationship of childhood upbringing and university degree program to environmental identity: experience in nature matters. Environmental Education Research, 24(2), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1249456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. C., & Berntsen, D. (2003). Life scripts help to maintain autobiographical memories of highly positive, but not highly negative, events. Memory & Cognition, 31(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar, G., Kunkle, K., & Monroe, M. C. (2020). Practitioner guide to assessing connection to nature. North American Association for Environmental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W. (2002). Knowledge, Information, and Household Recycling: Examining the knowledge-deficit model of behavior change. In T. Dietz & P. C. Stern, (Eds.), New Tools for environmental protection: Education, information, and voluntary measures (pp. 67–82). National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidlitz, L., & Diener, E. (1998). Sex differences in the recall of affective experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO (1978). Final report. Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization with United Nations Environmental Program in Tbilisi, USSR, 14-16 October 1977. UNESCO: Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, N. M., & Leskies, K. S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth, and Environment, 16(1), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Whitburn, J., Linklater, W. L., & Milfont, T. L. (2019). Exposure to urban nature and tree planning are related to pro-environmental behavior via connection to nature, the use of nature for psychological restoration, and environmental attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 51(7), 787–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517751009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar