The Case Salience Index, Public Opinion, and Decision Making on the U.S. Supreme Court

References

• Bailey, Michael A., and Forrest Maltzman. 2011. The Constrained Court: Law, Politics, and the Decisions Justices Make. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, Brandon L. 2011. “Choice in Context: How Case-level Factors Influence the Magnitude of Ideological Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Politics Research 39: 142–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, Lawrence. 2006. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, Christopher F., Mark E. Schaffer, and Steven Stillman. 2003. “Instrumental Variables and GMM: Estimation and Testing.” Stata Journal 3(1): 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benesh, Sara C., and Malia Reddick. 2002. “Overruled: An Event History Analysis of Lower Court Reaction to Supreme Court Alteration of Precedent.” Journal of Politics 64: 534–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Ryan C., Maron W. Sorenson, and Timothy R. Johnson. 2012. “Toward an Actor-based Measure of Supreme Court Case Salience: Information Seeking and Engagement during Oral Arguments.” Political Research Quarterly 66: 803–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, Alan. 1970. “The Recall of News Items.” Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 604–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, Saul. 1993. “The Chief Justice's Self Assignment of Majority Opinion in Salient Cases.” Social Science Journal 30: 143–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, Saul, and Theodore S. Arrington. 2002. “Measuring Salience on the Supreme Court: A Research Note.” Jurimetrics 43: 99–113.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, Paul. 2006. “Why Estimates of the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy Are Too High: Empirical and Theoretical Implications.” Social Forces 84: 2273–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvin, Bryan, Paul M. Collins, Jr., and Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha. 2011. “On the Relationship between Public Opinion and Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Political Research Quarterly 64(4): 736–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casillas, Christopher J., Peter K. Enns, and Patrick C. Wohlfarth. 2011. “How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 55: 74–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2012. “How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court,” http://dvn.iq.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/Enns/faces/study/StudyPage.xhtml?globalId=hdl:1902.1/14568&studyListingIndex=1_0a9d680dc737c5e6f21aa2bfc4c1 (accessed January 20, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Tom S., Jeffrey R. Lax, and Douglas R. Rice. 2015. “Measuring the Salience of Supreme Court Cases.” Journal of Law and Courts 3: 37–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins Paul M. Jr. 2008. “Amici Curiae and Dissensus on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 5: 143–70.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Todd A., and Christopher A. Cooper. 2012. “Case Salience and Media Coverage of Supreme Court Decisions: Toward a New Measure.” Political Research Quarterly 65: 396–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, Pamela C., Udi Sommer, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward. 2010. “Extreme Dissensus: Explaining Plurality Decisions on the United States Supreme Court.” Justice System Journal 31: 180–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-maker.” Journal of Public Law 6:279–95.
   Google Scholar
• Erbring, Lutz, Edie N. Goldenberg, and Arthur H. Miller. 1980. “Front Page News and Real-world Cues: A New Look at Agenda Setting by the Media.” American Journal of Political Science 24: 16–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 2000. “Measuring Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 66–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, Robert S., Michael D. MacKuen, and James A. Stimson. 2002. The Macro Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 2009. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Lester Kenyatta Spence. 2003. “The Supreme Court and the U.S. Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-inflicted or Otherwise?” British Journal of Political Science 33(4): 535–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, Micheal W., Bethany Blackstone, and Richard L. Vining, Jr. 2008. “The Supreme Court in American Democracy: Unraveling the Linkages between Public Opinion and Judicial Decision Making.” Journal of Politics 70: 293–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Matthew E. K. 2014. “The Semiconstrained Court: Public Opinion, the Separation of Powers, and the U.S. Supreme Court's Fear of Nonimplementation.” American Journal of Political Science 58: 352–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvard Law Review. 1981. “Plurality Decisions and Judicial Decisionmaking.” Harvard Law Review 94: 1127–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsh, Ethan. 1983. “The Supreme Court Beat: How Television Covers the U.S. Supreme Court.” Judicature 67: 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kelejian, Harry H. 1971. “Two-stage Least Squares and Economic Systems Linear in Parameters but Nonlinear in the Endogenous Variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 66(334): 373–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, Nathan J. 2005. “Political Choice, Public Policy, and Distributional Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science 49(4):865–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, Nathan J., and Peter K. Enns. 2010. “Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-reinforcing Link between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 54(4): 855–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, David A., and Roger P. Rose. 2014. “Case Salience and the Attitudinal Model: An Analysis of Ordered and Unanimous Votes on the Rehnquist Court.” Justice System Journal 35: 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltzman, Forrest, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2003. “Salience or Politics: New York Times Coverage of the Supreme Court.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Manza, Jeff, and Fay Lomax Cook. 2002. “A Democratic Polity? Three Views of Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion in the United States.” American Politics Research 30: 630–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathewson, Joe. 2011. The Supreme Court and the Press: The Indispensable Conflict. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Andrew, D., and Kevin M. Quinn. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis 10: 134–53.
   Google Scholar
• McAtee, Andrea, and Kevin T. McGuire. 2007. “Lawyers, Justices, and Issue Salience: When and How Do Legal Arguments Affect the U.S. Supreme Court?” Law and Society Review 41: 259–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, Kevin T., and James A. Stimson. 2004. “The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited: New Evidence on Supreme Court Responsiveness to Public Preferences.” Journal of Politics 66: 1018–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, Kevin T., Georg Vanberg, Charles E. Smith, and Gregory A. Caldeira. 2009. “Measuring Policy Content on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 71(4): 1305–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, William, and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 87(1): 87–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norpoth, Helmut, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 1994. “Comment: Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 88(3): 711–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1983. “Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.” American Political Science Review 77: 175–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilley, Shauna, Sean Richey, and J. Benjamin Taylor. 2012. “Using Google Search Data for State Politics Research: An Empirical Validity Test.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 12(2): 146–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, Mark J., and Herbert M. Kritzer. 2002. “Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 96: 305–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey A., and Albert Cover. 1989. “Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices.” American Political Science Review 83: 557–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey A., Chad Westerland, and Stefanie A. Lindquist. 2011. “Congress, the Supreme Court, and Judicial Review: Testing a Constitutional Separation of Powers Model.” American Journal of Political Science 55: 89–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey A., Lee Epstein, Charles M. Cameron, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1995. “Ideological Values and the Votes of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited.” Journal of Politics 57(3): 812–23, http://scdb.wustl.edu/data.php?s=5 (accessed February 15, 2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaeth, Harold J., Sara Benesh, Lee Epstein, Andrew D. Martin, Jeffery A. Segal, and Theodore J. Ruger. 2013. Supreme Court Database, Version 2013 Release 01, http://supremecourtdatabase.org (accessed February 21, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Spriggs, James F. II, Forrest Maltzman, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 1999. “Bargaining on the U.S. Supreme Court: Justices' Responses to Majority Opinion Drafts.” Journal of Politics 61: 485–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, Randolph T. 2001. “The Economy and Policy Mood: A Fundamental Dynamic of Democratic Politics?” American Journal of Political Science 45(3): 620–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimson, James A. 1991. Public Opinion in American: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder: Westview Press, http://www.unc.edu/˜jstimson/Data.html (accessed February 21, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Stimson, James A., Michael B. MacKuen, and Robert S. Erikson. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89: 543–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unah, Isaac, and Ange-Marie Hancock. 2006. “U.S. Supreme Court Decision Making, Case Salience, and the Attitudinal Model.” Law and Policy 28: 295–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ura, Joseph Daniel. 2009. “The Supreme Court and Issue Attention: The Case of Homosexuality.” Political Communication 26: 430–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlbeck, Paul J., James F. Spriggs II, and Forrest Maltzman. 1999. “The Politics of Dissents and Concurrences on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Politics Research 27: 488–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlezien, Christopher. 2005. “On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with ‘Most Important Problem.’” Electoral Studies 24: 555–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar