Estimating the “Legislators in Robes”: Measuring Judges' Political Preferences

References

• Atkins, Burton. 1988. "Judicial Selection in Context: The American and English Experience." Kentucky Law Journal 77(3): 577–619.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, Jeffrey S., and John Duggan. 2008. "A Dynamic Model of Democratic Elections in Multidimensional Policy Spaces." Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3(3): 269–299. doi: 10.1561/100.00006009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, Gad. 2010. Communities and Law: Politics and Cultures of Legal Identities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth, and Michael Laver. 2012. "The Dimensionality of Political Space: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations." European Union Politics 13(2): 194–218. doi: 10.1177/1465116511434618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth, Michael Laver, and Slava Mikhaylov. 2009. "Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions." American Journal of Political Science 53(2): 495–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00383.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobbio, Norberto. 1996. Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonica, Adam. 2011. "Ideology and Interests in American Politics." PhD dissertation, New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Bonica, Adam. 2014. "The punctuated origins of senate polarization." Legislative Studies Quarterly 39(1): 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bricker, Benjamin. 2017. "Breaking the Principle of Secrecy: An Examination of Judicial Dissent in the European Constitutional Courts." Law & Policy 39(2): 170–191. doi: 10.1111/lapo.12072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian. 1994. "A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally." British Journal of Political Science 24(4): 443–467. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400006955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian. 2001. "Validating Party Policy Placements." British Journal of Political Science 31(1): 179–223.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian. 2013. "The Standard Right-Left Scale." MARPOR. https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/down/papers/budge_right-left-scale.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, and Michael D. McDonald. 2012. "Conceptualising and Measuring 'Centrism' Correctly on the Left–Right Scale (RILE)-without Systematic Bias. A General Response by MARPOR." Electoral Studies 31(3): 609–612. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian and Thomas Meyer. 2013a. "The Best Tools to Tackle the Job". In: Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Ian Budge, Michael D. McDonald and Hans-Dieter Klingeman (eds.). Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 9–32.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian and Thomas Meyer. 2013b. "Understanding and Validating the Left-Right Score (RILE)". In: Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Ian Budge, Michael D. McDonald and Hans-Dieter Klingeman (eds.). Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Linda R, and Matthew L. Spitzer. 1995. "Judicial Deference to Agency Action: Rational Choice Theory and an Empirical Test." Southern California Law Review 69(2): 431–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, Frank B., and Stefanie A. Lindquist. 2006. "The Scientific Study of Judicial Activism." Minnesota Law Review 91(6): 1752–1784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, Frank B., and Blake J. Nelson. 2000. "Strategic Institutional Effects on Supreme Court Decisionmaking." Northwestern University Law Review 95(4): 1437–1494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. 1957. "Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker." Journal of Public Law 6(2): 279–95.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson-Sorkin, Amy. 2018. "Why Donald Trump Nominated Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court." The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/why-donald-trump-nominated-brett-kavanaugh-to-the-supreme-court (July 12, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Dotan, Yoav. 2000. Judicial Activism in Israel's High Court of Justice. In R. Gavison & M. Kremnitzer (Eds.) Judicial Activism: For and Against, The Role of the High Court of Justice in Israeli Society (pp. 5–65). Jerusalem: Magnes Pub. Hebrew University in Jerusalem. (Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Dotan, Yoav. 2001. Government Lawyers as Adjudicators: Pre-Petitions in the High Court of Justice Department 1990-1997. Israel Law Review, 35(2-3): 453–480.
   Google Scholar
• Dotan, Yoav. 2014. Lawyering for the Rule of Law: Government Lawyers and the Rise of Judicial Power in Israel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dotan, Yoav & Hofnung, Menachem 2001. Interest Groups in the Israeli High Court of Justice: Measuring Success in Litigation and in Out-of-Court Settlements. Law & Policy, 23(1): 1–27. doi: 10.1111/1467-9930.t01-1-00100.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 2000. "Toward a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics: A Look Back, a Look Ahead." Political Research Quarterly 53(3): 625–661. doi: 10.1177/106591290005300309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2013. "Reconsidering Judicial Preferences." Annual Review of Political Science 16: 11–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight, and Olga Shvetsova. 2001. "Comparing Judicial Selection Systems." William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 10(1): 7–36.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, Andrew D Martin, Kevin M Quinn, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 2007. "Ideological Drift among Supreme Court Justices: Who, When, and How Important." Northwestern University Law Review 101(4): 1483–1542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee & Olga V. Shvetsova (2002). Heresthetical maneuvering on the U.S. Supreme Court. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 14(1): 93–122. doi: 10.1177/095169280201400106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, Tom. 2008. "The Global Spread of Constitutional Review." In Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, eds. Keith Wittington and Daniel Keleman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2007. "The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe." Political Studies 55(3): 607–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00686.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grofman, Bernard, and Timothy J. Brazill. 2002. "Identifying the median justice on the Supreme Court through multidimensional scaling: Analysis of "natural courts" 1953–1991." Public Choice 112(1-2): 55–79. doi: 10.1023/A:1015601614637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthmann, Mattan. 2018. "The Dangerous Precedent of the Zeligamn Case." ICON-S-IL Blog. https://israeliconstitutionalism.wordpress.com/2018/06/12
   Google Scholar
• Hanretty, Chris. 2012. "Dissent in Iberia: The Ideal Points of Justices on the Spanish and Portuguese Constitutional Tribunals." European Journal of Political Research 51(5): 671–692. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02056.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmke, Gretchen. 2003. "Checks and Balances by Other Means: Strategic Defection and Argentina's Supreme Court in the 1990s." Comparative Politics 35(2): 213–230. doi: 10.2307/4150152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschl, Ran. 2008. "The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts." Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 93–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschl, Ran.. 2009. The Socio‐Political Origins of Israel's Juristocracy. Constellations, 16(3): 476–492.
   Google Scholar
• Iaryczower, Matias, Spiller, Pablo T., & Tommasi, Mariano. 2002. Judicial Independence in Unstable Environments, Argentina 1935-1998. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4): 699–716. doi: 10.2307/3088428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Bryan D. and Frank R. Baumgartner. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klinegmann, Hans-Dieter and Ian Budge. 2013. "Using the Manifesto Estimates to Refine Party Family Placements". In: Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Ian Budge, Michael D. McDonald and Hans-Dieter Klingeman (eds.). Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kretzmer, David. 2002. The Occupation of Justice: The Supreme Court of Israel and the Occupied Territories. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacewell, Owana P. and Annika Werner. 2013. "Coder Training: Key to Enhancing Reliability and Validity". In: Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Ian Budge, Michael D. McDonald and Hans-Dieter Klingeman (eds.). Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 169–194.
   Google Scholar
• Lauderdale, Benjamin E., and Tom S. Clark. 2012. "The Supreme Court's many median justices." American Political Science Review 106(4): 847–866. doi: 10.1017/S0003055412000469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauderdale, Benjamin E., and Tom S. Clark. 2014. "Scaling politically meaningful dimensions using texts and votes." American Journal of Political Science 58(3): 754–771. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and John Garry. 2000. "Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts." American Journal of Political Science 44(3): 619–634. doi: 10.2307/2669268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and Ernest Sergenti. 2011. Party Competition: An Agent-Based Model. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, Will. 2008. “Understanding Wordscores.” Political Analysis 16(4): 356–71. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpn004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Andrew D., and Kevin M. Quinn. 2002. "Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999." Political Analysis 10(2): 134–153. doi: 10.1093/pan/10.2.134.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Andrew D., Kevin M Quinn, and Lee Epstein (2005). "The Median Justice on the United States Supreme Court." North Carolina Law Review, 83(5): 1275–1322.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, Michael D, and Ian Budge. 2014. "Getting It (Approximately) Right (and Center and Left!): Reliability and Uncertainty Estimates for the Comparative Manifesto Data." Electoral Studies 35: 67–77. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.04.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Michael D., Silvya M. Mendes, and Ian Budge. 2004. "What Are Elections For? Conferring the Median Mandate." British Journal of Political Science 34(1): 1–26. doi: 10.1017/S0007123403000322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey, Richard D. 1976. "Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control." Journal of Economic Theory 12(3): 472–482. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(76)90040-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meydani, Assaf. 2011. The Israeli Supreme Court and the Human Rights Revolution: Courts as Agenda Setters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meydani, Assaf. 2012. The Supreme Court as a Political Entrepreneur: The Case of Israel. Israel Studies Review, 27(2), 65–85.
   Google Scholar
• Meydani, Assaf. 2014. The Anatomy of Human Rights in Israel: Constitutional Rhetoric and State Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meydani, Assaf, & Mizrahi, Shlomo. 2010. "The Relationship Between the Supreme Court and Parliament in Light of the Theory of Moves: The Case of Israel." Rationality and Society, 22(1), 55–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Thomas M, and Marcelo Jenny. 2013. "Measuring Error for Adjacent Policy Position Estimates: Dealing with Uncertainty Using CMP Data." Electoral Studies 32(1): 174–85. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbudun, Ergun. 2015. "Turkey's Judiciary and the Drift toward Competitive Authoritarianism." The International Spectator 50(2): 42–55. doi: 10.1080/03932729.2015.1020651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, Keith T. 2000. "Nonparametric unfolding of binary choice data." Political Analysis 8(3): 211–237. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a029814.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, Richard A. 2010. How Judges Think. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Jonathan B Slapin. 2009. "How to Avoid Pitfalls in Statistical Analysis of Political Texts: The Case of Germany." German Politics 18(3): 323–44. doi: 10.1080/09644000903055799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, William H. 1980. "Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority-Rule for the Study of Institutions." The American Political Science Review 74(2): 432–46. doi: 10.2307/1960638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ríos-Figueroa, Julio, and Jeffrey K. Staton. 2012. "An Evaluation of Cross-National Measures of Judicial Independence." The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 30(1): 104–137. doi: 10.1093/jleo/ews029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemer, John E. 2001. Political Competition: Theory and Applications. Boston MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, Maoz (2021). Judicial Review in a Politically Contested Environment. Program on Democratic Resilience and Development. Reichman University Working Paper 11/21.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, Maoz; Barzilai, Gad; Meydani, Assaf. 2021a. "Replication Data for: Judicial Review in a Defective Democracy Judicial Nominations and Judicial Review in Constitutional Courts", doi: 10.7910/DVN/L0QWDP,.Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:v8+/FJ/4gVp2y4GMUgunAw== [fileUNF]
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2021b. Judicial review in a defective democracy: Judicial nominations and judicial review in constitutional courts. Journal of Law and Courts, 9(1): 137–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotman, Simcha. 2019. The Bagaz Party. Jerusalem: Sela-Meir Pub. (Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey A. 2010. "Judicial Behavior." In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, eds. Keith E Whittington, R Daniel Kelemen, and Gregory A. Caldeira. New York and London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey A., and Albert D Cover. 1989. "Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices." American Political Science Review 83(2): 557–565. doi: 10.2307/1962405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey A., Lee Epstein, Charles M Cameron, and Harold J Spaeth. 1995. "Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited." The Journal of Politics 57(3): 812–823. doi: 10.2307/2960194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Martin. 2008. "Law and Politics: The Problem of Boundaries." In Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, eds. Gregory A. Caldeira and Keith E. Whittington. New York: Oxford University Press, 767–774.
   Google Scholar
• Shepsle, Kenneth A. 2006. "Old Questions And New Answers About Institutions: The Riker Objection Revisited." In The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, eds. Weingast Barry R. and Donald A. Wittman. Oxford: University Press Oxford, 1031–1049.
   Google Scholar
• Shetreet, Shimon. 2003. "Judges' Selection Processes: Procedures and Criteria." Ha'Mishpat 8: 357–404. (Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Slapin, Jonathan B., and Sven-Oliver Proksch. 2008. "A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts." American Journal of Political Science 52(3): 705–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00338.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, Udi. 2010. "A Strategic Court and National Security: Comparative Lessons from the Israeli Case." Israel Studies Review 25(2): 54–80. doi: 10.3167/isf.2010.250203.
   Google Scholar
• Stearns, Maxwell L. 2002. Constitutional Process: A Social Choice Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Making. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tahk, Alexander. 2018. "Nonparametric ideal-point estimation and inference." Political Analysis 26(2): 131–146. doi: 10.1017/pan.2017.38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, C Neal. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York and London: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanberg, Georg. 1998. "Abstract Judicial Review, Legislative Bargaining, and Policy Compromise." Journal of Theoretical Politics 10(3): 299–326. doi: 10.1177/0951692898010003005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanberg, Georg. 2001. "Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review." American Journal of Political Science: 346–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanberg, Georg. 2008. "Establishing and Maintaining Judicial Independence." In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, Oxford University Press, 99–118.
   Google Scholar
• Vanberg, Georg. 2015. "Constitutional Courts in Comparative Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment." Annual Review of Political Science 18: 167–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, Jeremy. 2006. "The Core of the Case against Judicial Review." The Yale Law Journal 115(6): 1346–1406. doi: 10.2307/20455656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weill, Rivka. 2020. The Strategic Common Law Court of Aharon Barak and its Aftermath: On Judicially-Led Constitutional Revolutions and Democratic Backsliding. The Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 14(2): 227–272. doi: 10.1515/lehr-2020-2017.
   Google Scholar
• Weinshall-Margel, Keren. 2011. "Attitudinal and Neo-Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8(3): 556–586.‏ doi: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01220.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinshall, Keren, and Lee Epstein. 2020. "Developing High-Quality Data Infrastructure for Legal Analytics: Introducing the Israeli Supreme Court Database." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 17(2): 416–434.‏ doi: 10.1111/jels.12250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinshall, Keren, Udi Sommer, and Ya'acov Ritov. 2018. "Ideological Influences on Governance and Regulation: The Comparative Case of Supreme Courts." Regulation & Governance 12(3): 334–352. doi: 10.1111/rego.12145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar