Understanding the Judiciary from the Inside. The Legal Culture of Judges in Mexico¹

References

• Alexy, Robert. 1994. El concepto y la validez del derecho. Barcelona: Gedisa.
   Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, Karina, 2008. “Legalistas, legalistas moderados y garantistas moderados: ideología legal de maestros, jueces, abogados, ministerios públicos y diputados.” Revista Mexicana de Sociología. 70(2): 331–349.
   Google Scholar
• Atienza, Manuel. 2006. El derecho como argumentación. Barcelona: Ariel Derecho.
   Google Scholar
• Atienza, Manuel. 2011. “Dos versiones de constitucionalismo.” Doxa: Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, 34: 73–88. doi: 10.14198/DOXA2011.34.04.
   Google Scholar
• Atienza, Manuel and Juan Ruíz Manero. 2007. “Dejemos atrás el positivismo jurídico.” Isonomía, no. 27 (Oct.): 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Atienza, Manuel and Juan Ruíz Manero. 2009. Para una teoría postpositivista del Derecho. Lima: TEMIS.
   Google Scholar
• Bárcena Arevalo, Erika. 2018. “La reproducción judicial y la cultura jurídica. El sistema de nombramiento de personal en la Suprema Corte mexicana.” Oñati Socio-legal Series 8(5): 739–759.
   Google Scholar
• Basabe-Serrano, Santiago. 2019. “The Judges’ Academic Background as Determinant of the Quality of Judicial Decisions in Latin American Supreme Courts.” Justice System Journal 40(2): 110–125. doi: 10.1080/0098261X.2019.1613201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigido, Ana María and Carlos Lista. 2009. “La enseñanza jurídica en la universidad frente a las reformas en el poder judicial”. Cuadernos de Educación 7(7): 325–340.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonell, Miguel, ed. 2007. Teoría del neoconstitucionalismo. Ensayos escogidos. Madrid: Trotta-IJJ-UNAM.
   Google Scholar
• Cotterrell, Roger. 1997. “The Concept of Legal Culture.” In Comparing Legal Cultures, edited by David Nelken, 13–32. Brookfield: Darmouth Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Cortés, Nancy, Octavio Rodríguez Ferreira and David A. Shirk. 2016. Justiciabarómetro. Perspectives on Mexico's Criminal Justice System: What Do Its Operators Think? Survey of Judges, Prosecutors, and Public Defenders. University of San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Couso, Javier. 2005. “Judicial Independence in Latin America: The Lessons of History in the Search for an Always Elusive Ideal”, In Institutions and Public Law: Comparative Approaches, edited by Ginsburg Tom and Robert A. Kagan. New York: Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Couso, Javier. 2010. “The Transformation of Constitutional Discourse and the Judicialization of Politics in Latin America.” In Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America, edited by Javier Couso, Alexandra Huneeus and Rachel Sieder, 141–160. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couso, Javier, Alexandra Huneeus and Rachel Sieder, eds. 2010. Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couso, Javier and Lisa Hilbink. 2011. “From Quietism to Incipient Activism.” In Courts in Latin America, edited by G. Helmke and J. Rios-Figueroa, 99–127. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, Andy, Jeremy Miles and Zoë Field. 2012. Discovering Statistics Using R. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Lawrence. 1975. The Legal System. A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Lawrence. 1997. “The Concept of Legal Culture. A Reply.” In Comparing Legal Cultures, edited by David Nelken, 33–40. Brookfield: Dartmouth Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Garapon, Antoine. 1995. “French Legal Culture and the Shock of ‘Globalization.’” Social & Legal Studies, 4(4): 493–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, John, and Lee Cojocaru. 2016.v “Selecting Cases for Intensive Analysis: A Diversity of Goals and Methods.” Sociological Methods & Research, 45(3): 392–423. doi: 10.1177/0049124116631692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L. and Gregory A. Caldeira. 1996. “The Legal Cultures of Europe.” Law and Society Rev 30(1): 55–86. doi: 10.2307/3054034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Ocantos, Ezequiel. 2016. Shifting Legal Visions: Judicial Change and Human Rights Trials in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guarnieri, Carlo. 2003. Giustizia e Politica: I nodi della seconda Repubblica. Bologna: II Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, H. 1958. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71(4): 593–629. doi: 10.2307/1338225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, K., J. Krois, and B. Waske. 2018. E-Learning Project SOGA: Statistics and Geospatial Data Analysis. Department of Earth Sciences: Freie Universitaet Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbink, Lisa. 2007. Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbink, Lisa and Matthew Ingram. 2019. “Courts and Rule of Law in Developing Countries.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, Matthew. 2016a. Crafting Courts in New Democracies: The Politics of Subnational Judicial Reform in Brazil and Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, Matthew. 2016b. “Networked Justice: Judges, the Diffusion of Ideas, and Legal Reform Movements in Mexico.” Journal of Latin American Studies 48(4): 739–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, Matthew. 2019. “Entrevistas. La política judicial en la voz de los expertos.” In Gobierno y política judicial en México, edited by Azul A. Aguiar-Aguilar, 172–193. Mexico City: Fontamara, IIJ-UNAM and TEPJF.
   Google Scholar
• Lars Lyberg, Mathew Stange, Janet Harkness, Peter Mohler, Beth-Ellen Pennell, and Lilli Japec. 2014. “A Review of Quality Issues Associated with Studying Hard-to-Survey Populations.” In Hard to Survey Populations, edited by Roger Tourangeau, Brad Edwards, Timothy P. Johnson, Kirk M. Wolter and Nancy Bates, 82–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lista, Carlos and Ana María Brigido. 2002. La enseñanza del derecho y la formación de la conciencia jurídica. Córdoba: Sima Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Nelken, David. 1997. Comparing Legal Cultures. Brookfield: Dartmouth Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Nelken, David. 2004. “Using the Concept of Legal Culture.” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 29: 2–26.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, Rodrigo. 2010. “Ideational Origins of Progressive Judicial Activism: The Colombian Constitutional Court and the Right to Health”. Latin American Politics and Society 52(3): 67–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2010.00090.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal, Barry Ames and Mitchell A. Seligson. 2006. “Strategy, Careers, and Judicial Decisions: Lessons from the Bolivian Courts”. The Journal of Politics 68(2): 284–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00406.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez Perdomo, Rogelio and Lawrence Friedman. 2003. “Latin Legal Cultures in the Age of Globalization.” In Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization: Latin America and Latin Europe, edited by Lawrence Friedman and Rogelio Pérez Perdomo, 1–19. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Rob and Brendon Swedlow. 2018. “Beyond Liberal and Conservative: Advancing the Study of Judicial Behavior with a Cultural Theory of Political Values.” Journal of Law and Courts 6(2): 263–302. doi: 10.1086/697459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadek, Maria Tereza, Maria da Glória Bonelli, Bolívar Lamounier, Gessé Marques, Ronaldo Porto M. 1995. A Crise do Judiciário Vista Pelos Juizes: resultados da pesquisa quantitativa. São Paulo: Sumaré.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez, Arianna, Beatriz Magaloni and Eric Magar. 2011. “Legalist vs. Interpretativist: The Supreme Court and the Democratic Transition in Mexico.” In Courts in Latin America, edited by Gretchen Helmke and Julio Rios-Figueroa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey and Harold Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SCJN. 2013. “Contradicción de tesis 299/2013”. Semanario Judicial de la Federación. Access: https://sjf.scjn.gob.mx/sjfsist/paginas/DetalleGeneralV2.aspx?id=25944&Clase=DetalleTesisEjecutorias
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Martin. 1963. “Political Jurisprudence.” Kentucky Law Journal 52(2): 294–345.
   Google Scholar
• Silbey, Susan. 2010. “Legal Culture and Cultures of Legality.” In Handbook of Cultural Sociology, edited by John Hall, Laura Grindstaff and Ming-Cheng Lo, 470–479. London and New York: Routlege.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, Roger. 2014. “Defining Hard-to-Survey Populations.” In Hard to Survey Populations, edited by Roger Tourangeau, Brad Edwards, Timothy P. Johnson, Kirk M. Wolter and Nancy Bates, 3–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werneck Vianna, Luiz, Maria Alice Rezende de Carvalho, Manuel Palacios Cunha Melo and Marcelo Baumann Burgos. 1997. Corpo e alma da magistratura brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Revan.
   Google Scholar